Roses in a vineyard allow the grower to have advance notice of disease so
that (s)he can decide on preventative measures. This landscape describes
biotechnological uses of the same concept for warning of land mines, nutrient
conditions, diseases etc.
About this technology landscape
Authored by: Shoko Okada and Marie Connett-Porceddu, CAMBIA 2006. Support
for this work came from the Rockefeller Foundation in a match to funding
supplied to CAMBIA's lab by the Lemelson Foundation for a grant proposal
authored by Marie Connett-Porceddu and Richard Jefferson in 2005. We are happy
to express our appreciation for this funding. Text from the grant proposal was
also used in this technology landscape.
We are grateful for format assistance from Nik Hatta and Stephanie Goodrick
for content editing and to Heidi Loder for proofreading. As with any
technology landscape, there will have been changes in patent status since the
searches were done, and new publications may appear and new patents may issue.
If you notice that information in this landscape needs updating, help the
community by posting a comment so that others will be aware of the information.
Bioindicator Systems
 |
|
A well known example of a plant acting as a biological marker: roses at
the ends of rows of grapevines in a vineyard show earlier symptoms of certain
fungal diseases; the grower can choose what to do about the disease in the
grapes based on what is seen in the rosebushes
|
Plants can be engineered as living instruments, to provide farmers with
valuable, timely and low-cost means to measure and monitor the status of their
natural resources. This will provide new opportunities for empowering local
choices about what to do with local crops, rather than bringing in crops and
methods from elsewhere. Such engineering integrates the use of novel methods of
molecular biology with the basic understanding of a field problem1
and a farmer-centered view about overcoming real challenges to sustainable,
profitable crop production.
Sentinel plants, or bioindicators, have long been used in many agricultural
systems to empower the farmer to make good decisions about land use, such as
what to plant where and when to add expensive or labor-intensive inputs such as
fertiliser, water and pesticides. A well-known example is the traditional
planting of roses at row ends in vineyards. The roses show early symptoms of
fungus that may affect the grape crop, therefore providing an early signal to
the farmer to arrange for fungal control of the grapes, appropriate to the local
soil, weather and consumer preference. A biosentinel can be any species that
can grow on the land of interest concurrently with the crop of interest, or at
the best decision time. It receives a signal from the environment and translates
it in a way that is readily observable by people who can then decide what to do
about it. The signal could even come from the crop itself: for example, leaves
beginning to wilt signals that fruit set will be hurt unless there is more
water.
To see some examples of engineered bioindicators, click
here.
To see more about patents and patent applications that cover the field of
bioindicators or biosentinels, click
here.
See
presentation:"BiOSentinel Plants: Enabling Farmer Choice". M.B. Connett
Porceddu and R.A. Jefferson (2007) Hainan,
China. Take me to
the BioForge Project Forum on Bioindicators
Rationale
Farmers are brilliant problem solvers.
They have to be. Nonetheless, they solve problems best when they can see and
measure them, and when they have options to respond to them within their
constraints. For most of the world's rural people, these constraints are almost
always associated with poverty and neglect, not a lack of ingenuity, motivation
or commitment.
Key challenges in agriculture, such as wise use of nutrients or protection
from pests, are often best solved by management choices made by farmers,
themselves. These challenges can only be confronted, however, when they are
known and when solutions can be crafted and locally chosen.
Science has made great strides in understanding some of these challenges, but
the knowledge alone does not provide capacity to address them. Knowledge must be
converted into action, and to be sustainable and equitable, this conversion must
be accessible to resource-poor people.
There is now a unique opportunity to use new technology to couple the
creativity of farmers with new tools to forecast and measure their constraints
in a timely and affordable manner. Then, as communities of innovators, they can
craft their own options for improving their production systems.
We propose to rethink biotechnology radically, countering the sociological
disempowerment of rendering farmers passive recipients, not active innovators.
We propose an open, collaborative process to develop and share biological
technology to engineer plants, not as short-term moneymakers, but as living
instruments to monitor natural resources. These technologies do not lend
themselves to substantial profit incentives for their creators, because the user
and beneficiary is the local farmer.
This project brings together novel elements in the scientific literature to
create a new proof of concept for worldwide rice cultivation. A
biosentinel or bioindicator is an engineered plant that senses
an important constraint, limiting nutrition or threatening pests, and sends a
specific signal. The signal could be a change in the morphology of the leaves, a
bright color, or even a smell that relates to a soil deficiency or a cryptic
fungus.
The project seeks co-development by widespread members of the scientific
community of bioindicator components from which the modules can be chosen
locally by farmers and breeders. The components may be patented by their owners,
but by participating in this project the owners are declaring their intention
that both research and commercial uses will be licensed in a way that allows
their unconstrained use for this purpose. The modules can be used in various
combinations and in other crops as appropriate, so that the results are
sustained and usable well past the end of the project.
This revolutionary use of biotechnology shows a potential to effect a
dramatic change in how science is incorporated into social agendas. It puts
local-scale, informed decision-making in the hands of those experiencing
problems and committed to their sustainable solution.
In a systems approach to get the engineered bioindicator
concept working in a globally important cropping system to address real local
constraints, we envision a biosentinel or bioindicator with the following
modules that can be recombined according to local preference:
-
An indicator species that is suitable for the cultural
system, the soil, the climate, etc. This can be the crop of interest or, even
better, plants that are outside the food chain but grown alongside the crop.
With the availability of CAMBIA's
TransBacter
project, we hope that new protocols will be co-developed among various
communities to facilitate the transformation of diverse potential bioindicator
plants. Most of the previous research has been done on Arabidopsis
using Agrobacterium methods encumbered by a variety of patents that
prevent practical use outside companies that have closely held licenses
(view).
CAMBIA, via a BiOS
license, is also offering the
TransBacter
technology to encourage participants to use the method to obviate these
obstructive licensing practices for bioindicators for public good.
- A receptor for the signal, e.g. in the roots of a plant, if we are
after a bioindicator for a nutrient deficiency. For this, each community may
decide what sort of bioindicators they need; we're looking for input in our
Forum or by
E-mail.
- A transduction of the signal from the receptor site via a responsive system.
- Translation of the signal into something that can be observed, such as
wilting, an odor, or a visible or infra-red color change mediated by a GUS gene
product, an anthocyanin gene or similar genes, expressed in a part of the plant
that is observable. (Ideally, the signal should be quantifiable, expressed in
proportion to the level of the physiological parameter being detected. In the
best mode, two signals could be used, which can be compared against each other
for high accuracy. Amplification of the signal could potentially occur at any
point in this chain, for example at the signal transduction step via a
transactivation
cassette.) In this project, CAMBIA is offering highly distinctive
visual
markers and
transactivation
cassettes to help move this technology into a real working model.
- A detection system for humans (an inventive device, or one of the five
senses), ideally nondestructive, inexpensive or costless to use, reliable under
field conditions and requires no instrumentation.
- Ways to act on the information, e.g. an input, intercropping or
other timely, locally appropriate actions, in the farmer's best judgment.
An advantage of the systems approach is that it can bring non-transgenic or
post-transgenic modules to service for empowering particular actions by farmers
and breeders. Such actions will more likely lead to adoption and further
innovation of the technology as compared to the provision of a complete
bioindicator prototype.
Realizing that there may be even better visual markers and promoters out
there, we hope this provides impetus for talented groups that may identify
and/or provide such useful markers for the bioindicators project as a public
good. Do you know of any that might be really useful for this purpose? If so,
comment on this page.
Modules may be patented, but the capability to use them for research and
commercial purposes by all those interested to use and improve them for public
good can still be shared via a
BiOS license.
|

|
|
Weed exhibiting red-purple colour due
to the presence of TNT in the soil (Photo provided by Aresa)
|
One significant aspect of the innovation will be identification
of indicator species appropriate to the local cultivation system, sensitive to
the condition of interest, and able to provide an observable signal. In 1998,
Kovalchuk et al.,
Bioindicator plants to detect nuclear pollution, engineered
Arabidopsis plants to analyze the influence of chronic irradiation from
the environment of the Chernobyl exclusion zone, on the stability of plant
genomes. In this example, bioindicator plants were shown to be an effective
indicator of change within the surrounding environment.
Another example encompasses research conducted by
Aresa, a private company
originally based at the University of Copenhagen, that is marketing bioindicator
plants commercially. Aresa genetically engineered a weedy plant with a gene that
produced a red-colored product when the gene's expression was induced by a
receptor as a breakdown product of TNT. This enabled the plant to be used as a
sentinel for the presence of soil residues indicating the presence of land
mines.
The underlying mechanism by which the color change occurs is via an altered
regulation of the natural pigment biosynthetic pathways in the plants.
Familiarly, many plants turn reddish in autumn or as a result of stressed growth
conditions when synthesis of the red (anthocyanin) pigments dominates over the
normal green color. The genetically engineered plants are modified in a way that
allows these plants to turn red-purple if triggered by TNT in the soil.
Shown below2 at left is a photo of a soil tray planted with the
engineered bioindicator seed in which the upper right quadrant of the soil has
been drenched with liquid TNT. The photo at the right indicates the size of
isolated plants.

Gene products that might be applied to measuring iron and phosphate levels
and heavy metals in soil have been identified by scientists3, and
Aresa has announced a plan to commercialize the latter for
bioremediation4. Unfortunately, in the iron and phosphate plant
sentinel prototype systems, the effects of the measurement are seen in the
roots5 (not readily visible to the farmer) or as a very slow change
in the shoots6 (timing that may not facilitate effective response
measures).
Ideally, changes in an indicator species would be phenotypes that could be
rapidly and easily detected by farmers, but that may not persist very long.
Possible examples include a color change on a de-greened background (Medford
et al.), a shape change or a texture change, such as the presence or
absence of trichomes. Such changes might appear in leaves or stem segments
produced only in plastochrons immediately associated with the stress, and leaf
or stem segment production would revert to normal in sectors produced after the
stress passes.
Some of our ideas about these changes are on the
BioForge.
If you have ideas about such changes and how to effect them, please make a
posting in the
forum.
To see more about patents and patent applications that cover the field of
bioindicators or biosentinels, click here.
Scientific literature review on nutrient monitoring
History on use of sentinel organisms to assess soil quality -
farmers' traditional knowledge
Human beings have a long history of agriculture. The earliest
evidence of farming is currently estimated to be 10,000 BC, where rye grains
with characteristics indicative of domestication were identified in Abu Hureyra,
Syria (Vasey, 1992). The later four ancient civilizations that arose between
5000 - 1500 BC (Egypt, China, Mesopotamia and Indus civilizations) all evolved
around great rivers that provided successful establishment due to agriculture,
known to archeologists through detailed documentation by the individual
civilizations (Reed, 1977).[add a comment]
This long history of agriculture enabled farmers to pick up
environmental 'hints' that led to a rich harvest of crops. Among the various
abiotic and biological indicators that were available to them, the presence of
particular plant species or a community of plant species was an indicator
commonly used to assess soil quality. Use of such 'indicator plants' on a
particular piece of land to determine suitable crop plants to be cultivated is
documented as early as 50 AD by Pliny the Elder (23-79 AD, author of
Naturalis Historia; Sampson, 1939). Unfortunately, documentation of
such studies or knowledge were rare until the early 1900s (Clements, 1920; Hursh
and Crafton, 1935). An extensive early review on plant indicators was compiled
by Sampson (1939). The following key points concerning soil quality indicators
in particular were raised:[add a comment]
- a community of plant species is a better indicator than just a single
species to assess soil condition
- 'characteristic species' that are ecologically specialized to a particular
environment serve as good indicators (in comparison to more common species)
- the reliability of plant species as indicators is highly dependent on the
knowledge of the ecological relations between the native vegetation, suitable
crop of interest and environmental variables (and therefore thorough research on
the relationship of these factors is critical for the vegetative observations to
have value)
- native perennial vegetation, in particular tree species are better
indicators than annual species
- annual species are good indicators of grazing pressure
- deficiency of particular nutrients can be detected by change in colour of
leaves in certain plant species (e.g. nitrogen deficiency can be detected by
leaf discolouration in hemp and buckwheat)
In a more recent review on the use of weed species community
structure to assess soil condition, Hill and Ramsay (1977) compiled a list of
weed species and under what condition it was found to grow. This review raises
a point that the weed species/soil condition relationship is not a definite one,
and that the list should be used as an opinion, rather than an answer to a
particular problem.[add a comment]
Current studies on indicators of soil quality are focusing on
community structures of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi (Chen et
al., 2003; Winding et al., 2005; Toljander et al.,
2006). One patent application that utilizes the concept of screening community
structure to assess soil condition uses single nucleotide polymorphisms to
investigate nematode diversity
(WO
2004/090164). These studies on microbial community structure lead to
isolation of certain microorganisms that can further be genetically engineered
to become powerful tools as sensitive bioindicators that detect specific
substances in the environment.[add a comment]
Current methods to measure soil condition
Current available methods to measure soil parameters involve a
colorimetric system. The sample is combined with a substrate that causes a
chemical reaction between a nutrient of interest within the sample
(e.g. nitrogen, phosphate, potassium) and the substrate that produces
colour, the intensity of which is then measured using photometers. Laboratories
conduct tests for farmers, however problems such as sampling cost and effort,
and delays in obtaining results has deterred farmers from utilizing such
services. As an alternative to sending samples to laboratories, there are
relatively inexpensive, field-based test kits available in the market. Many
portable test kits are supplied by various companies including
Palintest,
AquaticLife, Rapitest,
Lamotte,
Milwaukee Instruments,
Hach,
ELE, and
Merck.
Limitations with these portable test kits are inconsistancy in results due to
sampling and testing variation or error (Daniels et al., 2001),
accuracy (laboratory results will provide more accurate results), and complexity
of use with certain kits (and therefore necessity for training).[add a comment]
In all cases, they do not provide the opportunity to continuously
monitor the environment - in other words, early detection of conditional
deterioration is difficult with the colourimetric system unless routine
monitoring can be conducted.[add a comment]
Proposals of alternative methods to assess environmental conditions
- Transgenic biosensors that respond to particular conditions
A number of scientists in educational institutions have expressed
optimism about the use of genetic engineering to produce transgenic bioindicator
organisms that can detect nutrient deficiency in a particular environment
(Ollinger et al., 2003; Sobral, 1997; Sandhana, 2003; MJ Hawkesford lab
website,
http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/cpi/men/mh.html;
CEBIOVEM,
http://www.cebiovem.unito.it/indexeng.html).
Research in the field of nutrient deficiency detection has been concentrating on
identifying genes that are upregulated during starvation of particular
nutrients, isolating the promoter region of such genes, and linking them with
reporter genes. Examples of such systems and transformed organisms include
PSQD1::GUS into A. thaliana (P deficiency; Hammond et
al., 2003), PphoA::luxCDABE into P. fluorescens and
E. coli (P deficiency; Dollard and Billard, 2003),
PphoA::luxAB into a Synechococcus sp. (P deficiency; Schreiter
et al., 2001), PglnA::luxAB into a Synechococcus sp.
(N deficency; Gillor et al., 2003), PnarG::inaZ and
PnarG::GFP into E. cloacae (N deficiency; DeAngelis et
al., 2005), and PisiAB::luxAB into a Synechococcus sp.
(Fe deficiency; Durham et al., 2002). However, the technology of this
field is still in early stages of research and development.[add a comment]
One patent family (WO 1994/13831: A highly sensitive method for
detecting environmental insults by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.; see chapter
5 - Detection of metal and other toxic compounds) contains granted patents in
Canada (CA 2150232), Europe (EP 673439) and the United States (US 5683868),
which generally claims a method to detect change in environmental conditions
using a bioindicator organism. This patent family provides examples of
transgenic E. coli strains that can detect nitrogen and phosphate
limitation.[add a comment]
A team lead by Dr Anthony Trewavas at the School of Biological
Sciences, Edinburgh University was reported to have developed a transgenic
potato that can detect dehydration in 1999
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/specials/sheffield_99/446837.stm),
but we were not able to identify a scientific article or any patent documents
concerning this research.[add a comment]
References
General
Blake-Kalff MMA, Zhao FJ, Hawkesford MJ, McGrath SP (2001). Using
plant analysis to predict yield losses caused by sulphur deficiency. Ann.
Appl. Biol. 138:123-127.[add a comment]
Clements FE (1920). Plant indicators: the relation of plant
communities to process and practice. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. No. 290. 388
pp.[add a comment]
Daniels MB, Delaune P, Moore PA Jr, Mauromoustakos A, Chapman SL,
Langston JM. (2001). Soil phosphorus variability in pastures: implications for
sampling and environmental management strategies.
J
Environ Qual. 30(6):2157-65.[add a comment]
DeAngelis KM, Ji P, Firestone MK, Lindow SE (2005). Two Novel
Bacterial Biosensors for Detection of Nitrate Availability in the Rhizosphere.
Appl
Environ Microbiol 71(12):8537–8547.[add a comment]
Hill SB, Ramsey J (1977). Weeds as Indicators Of Soil Conditions.
Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Quebec,
Canada.
http://www.eap.mcgill.ca/Publications/EAP67.htm
[add a comment]
Hursh CR, Crafton WM (1933). Plant indicators of soil conditions
on recently abandoned fields. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Appalachian Forest Experiment Station,
http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/813.pdf
[add a comment]
Ollinger S, Sala O, Ågren GI, Berg B, Davidson E, Field CB, Lerdau
MT, Neff J, Scholes M, Sterner R. (2003). New Frontiers in the Study of Element
Interactions.
http://www.brown.edu/Research/ECI/people/sala/pdfs/114%20-%20SCOPE61chapter4.pdf
[add a comment]
Reed CA ed. (1977). The Origins of Agriculture. Mouton, The Hague.
[add a comment]
Sampson AW (1939). Plant indicators-- concept and status.
Bot. Rev. 5: 155-206.[add a comment]
Sandhana L (2003). Plants: New Anti-Terror Weapon?
http://wired-vig.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,58118,00.html
(news article on Dr Jack Schultz and funding from the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency to develop transgenic A. thaliana that can detect
explosives)[add a comment]
Sobral BWS (1997). Genetic tools for a sustainable future.
http://www.csu.edu.au/learning/ncgr/gpi/odyssey/green/index.htm
[add a comment]
Toljander JF, Eberhardt U, Toljander YK, Paul LR, Taylor AF.
(2006). Species composition of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community along a
local nutrient gradient in a boreal forest.
New
Phytol. 170(4):873-84.[add a comment]
Vasey DE (1992). An Ecological History of Agriculture: 10,000
B.C. - A.D. 10,000. Iowa State University Press.[add a comment]
Winding A, Hund-Rinke K, Rutgers M (2005). The use of
microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.
Ecotoxicol
Environ Saf. 62(2):230-48.[add a comment]
Phosphate/phosphorus
Dollard MA, Billard P. (2003). Whole-cell bacterial sensors for
the monitoring of phosphate bioavailability.
J
Microbiol Methods 55(1):221-9.[add a comment]
Gillor O, Hadas O, Post AF, Belkin S. (2002). Phosphorus
bioavailability monitoring by a bioluminescent cyanobacterial sensor
strain. J Phycol. 38:107-115.[add a comment]
Hammond JP, Bennett MJ, Bowen HC, Martin R. Broadley MR, Eastwood
DC, May ST, Rahn C, Swarup R, Woolaway KE, and White PJ (2003). Changes in gene
expression in Arabidopsis shoots during phosphate starvation and the
potential for developing smart plants.
Plant
Physiol. 132:578-596.[add a comment]
Schreiter PP, Gillor O, Post A, Belkin S, Schmid RD, Bachmann TT.
(2001). Monitoring of phosphorus bioavailability in water by an immobilized
luminescent cyanobacterial reporter strain.
Biosens
Bioelectron. 16(9-12):811-8.[add a comment]
Nitrogen
Chen G, Zhu H, Zhang Y (2003). Soil microbial activities and
carbon and nitrogen fixation.
Res
Microbiol.154(6):393-8.[add a comment]
Gillor O, Harush A, Hadas O, Post AF, Belkin S (2003). A
Synechococcus PglnA::luxAB fusion for estimation of nitrogen
bioavailability to freshwater cyanobacteria.
Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 69:1465-1474.[add a comment]
Other
Durham KA, Porta D, Twiss MR, McKay RML, Bullerjahn GS (2002).
Construction and initial characterization of a luminescent
Synechococcus sp. PCC7942 Fe-dependent bioreporter.
FEMS
Microbiol Lett. 209:215-221.[add a comment]
Claims define what is patented
|
The claims are the most important part of a patent. Not the
title, not the text, not the examples, and not the figures.
|
It is the claims that define the boundaries of the patent owner's rights.
Remember that the patent owner's rights are exclusionary: (s)he may exclude
others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing the patented
invention (e.g. a product or a process), and from importing a product
made by a process patented in the importing country. To determine if someone is
infringing a patent, (i.e. making, using the invention, etc. without
the patent owner's permission), the allegedly infringing product or process is
compared only to the claims of that patent.
Claims cannot to be interpreted in a vacuum. Although claims define the
invention, the scope of the claimed invention is not always clear from reading
the plain language of the claim. Claim interpretation can be difficult; a proper
analysis is done by reading the claims in the context of the specification and
in the context of the "prosecution history" (the back and forth negotiations
between the patent applicant and the patent office regarding the claim
language), and no particular interpretation may be binding unless and until
there is litigation. Thus, although claims in this technology landscape were
analyzed from the plain language and the specification, scope of the claimed
inventions may not have always been precisely determined.
A patent application is not the same as a patent
|
A patent application is NOT the same as a patent. Claims in a published
patent application have not been examined by a national patent office and may
not be representative of a scope that will ultimately be granted.
|
In the countries where the patents analysed in this landscape were filed,
patent specifications are published 18 months after the earliest filing. The
publications contain the claims of the application as filed. Often, the claims
in the application are written much more broadly than is actually patentable. As
the application is examined by a patent office and claim language negotiated,
the claims may shrink in scope. The specification of a granted patent will
usually be the same as when published, but it also may change as the result of a
successful opposition or re-examination.
The truth about international patents
|
There is no such thing as an international patent.
|
A patent is awarded by the government of a country and is valid only within
its territorial boundaries. To obtain a patent that is valid in a particular
country, a request must be made in that country's patent office.
Confusion and misunderstanding about "international patents" arises sometimes
from the process of pursuing patents through the World Intellectual Property
Organisation (WIPO). When looking at a WO ("World") published patent
application, many people erroneously, but understandably, conclude that it is an
application for a patent that will be valid in multiple countries. However, it
is not a patent, and indeed it may never reach the national application phase or
become a patent in any country.
|
The international (PCT) application is a "placeholder" application for
national filings.
|
Through an international treaty (Paris Convention Treaty), a group of
countries agreed to offer patent applicants in these countries a one-year period
in which to file an application in one of the other countries without losing the
benefit of their filing date. The advantage is that any "art" (related
technology) that became known after the original filing date in the home country
but before the filing date in another country could not be cited against the
application. Thus, for example, an application filed in Canada could wait up to
one year before filing the application in Mexico under the same "priority date".
This would give an applicant time to decide whether the costs of filing in other
countries is justified.
Later, a second treaty (Patent Cooperation Treaty, PCT) established another
route to delay the additional filings in other countries. In this method, an
international office was set up ((WIPO) to receive and process the applications.
But now, the applicant has one year to file at the WIPO office, preserving
rights and original filing date in those designated countries without having to
go to the expense of actually filing in each country. Eventually to obtain a
patent in these countries, the application does need to be filed in the national
patent offices (the process is called "conversion"), pay fees, have translations
done and comply with the regulations of each individual office. Depending on
some procedural issues and fee payments, the applicant may have up to 30 months
from the original filing date (the date the application was filed in the home
country) to decide whether or not to file and undergo these expenses in each of
these other countries.
What is "ownership" of a patent?
The legal owner of a patent is designated as the "Assignee" on United States
patents and as the "Applicant" on patents in the rest of the world.
Patent law gives the patent owner the right to exclude others from making,
using, offering for sale, selling, and importing the patented product and from
using the patented process, as well as using, offering for sale, selling, or
importing a product obtained directly from a patented process. These rights are
tradeable. The typical form of trade is a license, in which some or all of the
rights may be transferred. For example, the patent owner may license only some
of the claims in a patent, all of the claims but only in a particular field of
research, all of the rights but only in certain countries, or the right to make
and use but not the right to sell. The cost may vary from nil to high, and
licenses may be exclusive or non-exclusive.
The holder of an exclusive license can control the rights in much the same
way as the "owner" of the patent. However, unlike the ownership of a patent,
which is a matter of public record, licenses in most countries can be private.
Unless the parties to a license choose to reveal the relationship, it can be
impossible to obtain information about it.
In this paper, the legal owner of record is noted. The
cautionary note is that the legal owner may not be the party that is in control
of the rights you want access to.
Why a technology landscape on bioindicator systems?
Objective
Assessment on the condition of a particular environment, such as
detecting:[add a comment]
- contaminants such as heavy metals or human-made chemical compounds,
- lack of nutrients or minerals in soil or water, or
- physical conditions such as ambient temperature, humidity and UV radiation,
currently rely heavily on quantitative methods using complex
electronic or chemistry-based systems. Such methods can be expensive, time
consuming and labour-intensive. The interpretation of quantitative results in
biological or qualitative terms can also be difficult, in other words, how does
one decide how much/less is too much/less for an organism in a given
environment?[add a comment]
In order to overcome some of the problems with the present
available methods to monitor environmental conditions, molecular biologists have
started using biotechnological tools to create 'live' reporter organisms that
detect the presence/absence of particular substances or conditions and convert
the corresponding message into a detectable signal. The signal can be detected
on site, that reflects a biological condition of the reporter organism in
response to the environment that is being assessed, therefore remedial action
can be implemented without delay.[add a comment]
A survey and analysis on patent and non-patent (journal)
literature concerning technology in the field of bioindicator systems was
conducted to investigate the following points:[add a comment]
- institutions and inventors in this field
- what technology has been developed, assessed, and patented, and
- what stage of research and development the field of bioindicator systems is
currently in.
Scope of this technology landscape
The main focus of this technology landscape is on transgenic
bioindicator systems that detect the presence or lack of substances and physical
conditions in the external environment. There are many non-patent literature
and patent documents on nucleic acid sequences concerning inducible promoters,
transporters and reporters as well as bioindicators that detect pathogens that
have not been included in this landscape.[add a comment]
What this this technology landscape about?
This technology landscape focuses on the following three main
topics:[add a comment]
- bioindicator systems that involve development of transgenic organisms
- bioindicator systems that detect presence or lack of substances in the
external environment of an organism (or a community of organisms)
- bioindicators systems that detect abiotic stress conditions towards an
organism (or a community of organisms)
This technology landscape is divided into six chapters and an
appendix:[add a comment]
- General information (introduction on patents and about this technology
landscape on bioindicator systems)
- Soil condition monitoring (scientific literature review)
- Detection of abiotic stress (patent analysis)
- Detection of metal and other toxic compounds (patent analysis)
- Detection of explosives (patent analysis)
- General bioindicator systems (patent analysis)
- Appendix (patent analysis)
What is this technology landscape not about?
The following topics have not been considered in this technology
landscape, since each topic contains sufficient information for them to have
individual technology landscapes:[add a comment]
- inducible promoter sequences
- transporter sequences
- reporter gene sequences
- bioindicator systems that detect pathogens
- biosensors that do not involve transformation (e.g. enzyme biosensors,
antibody/reporter protein biosensors)
Reference
Kohler S, Belkin S, Schmid RD. (2000). Reporter gene assays in
environmental analysis.
Fresenius
J Anal Chem. 366:769-779.[add a comment]
Models of bioindicator systems in this landscape
There are two basic types of transgenic bioindicator systems that are
introduced in this technology landscape:[add a comment]
- Inducible promoter that directs expression of a reporter gene
- Constitutive promoter that directs expression of a reporter gene
Inducible promoter that induces expression of a reporter gene
This concept is relatively straight forward, in that the environmental
condition, compound, or substrate triggers the promoter to direct expression of
the reporter gene. The inducible promoter may respond to a single stimulant, or
to a set of stimulants. Promoters that respond to physical conditions (such as
drought, temperature, or high salinity) are mainly identified from plants,
whereas those that respond to particular compounds or substrates tend to be
found in prokaryotes, e.g. bacteria isolated from sites with high
levels of particular chemicals, selected for their the ability to
metabolise/detoxify such chemicals.[add a comment]
The figure below shows some examples of promoters and reporters that have
been used in this way in the literature.[add a comment]
[add a comment]
Constitutive promoter that directs expression of a reporter gene
The second bioindicator system uses constitutive expression of the reporter
gene. The reporter signal can be used in many ways to detect the presence of an
environmental condition or a compound/substance, including the following four:
[add a comment]
- Decrease in reporter signal as an indicator that the transgenic organism is
under stress and all constitutive expression is decreased
- Constitutive expression as a control (this system is used in conjunction
with an inducible promoter - reporter gene system, where one reporter serves as
an internal standard against which changes in the other are measured)
- Use of a transactivator to up-regulate expression of a "constitutive"
promoter that is normally expressed only at a very low level or that is
constitutively turned "off" (examples in the literature have used the 35S
"minimal" promoter fragment)
- Use of a repressor gene to down-regulate expression of a promoter that is
normally constitutive
The figure below shows some examples of promoters and reporters that have
been used in this way in the literature.[add a comment]
[add a comment]
Detection of abiotic stress - Summary
This chapter introduces two patent families, both filed by
Syngenta Participations AG, that used microarray technology to
identify polynucleotide sequences that have altered expression in a plant that
has been exposed to cold, saline, or osmotic stress (or combinations of the
stresses). There are several differences between the two patent families:[add a comment]
|
Patent family
|
Assignee
|
Subject plant *
|
Claim structure
|
|
WO 2002/016655
|
The Scripps Research Institute
Syngenta Participations AG
|
Rice
|
- Method to identify stress conditions in plants
|
|
WO 2003/008540
|
Syngenta Participations AG
|
Arabidopsis thaliana |
- Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides
- Method to identify stress conditions in plants
- Method for altering tolerance of a plant to stress
|
* The plants in this column were used to identify polynucleotides
and polypeptides of interest, however the claims in the patent documents are not
limited to them.[add a comment]
Both patent families contain claims that are generally drawn
towards use of the stress-responsive regulatory elements (nucleotide sequence
that affects transcription of the corresponding coding region) to create
sentinel plants that can detect presence of stress.[add a comment]
Patent applications filed by the Scripps
Research Institute, Syngenta Participations AG, and Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V.
Technology overview
The patent family described in this section filed by the Scripps Research
Institute, Syngenta Participations AG, and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
discloses a DNA microarray-based detection method of plants that have been
exposed to abiotic stress. The technology describes a group of nucleotide
sequences that have altered expression patterns when rice is exposed to abiotic
stress conditions, in particular cold, saline and osmotic stress. The
description identifies use of the regulatory elements of these stress-responsive
genes along with reporter genes (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, CAT;
ß-glucuronidase, GUS; green fluorescent protein, GFP; ß-galactosidase, ß-GAL;
luciferase) as a means to produce transgenic plants that can act as biosentinels
that detect the presence of abiotic stress conditions. The related journal
publication of this technology is Cooper et al. (2003). A network of
rice genes associated with stress response and seed development.
Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA. 100(8):4945-4950.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
CA 2420555
- Earliest priority - 24 Aug 2000
- Filed - 24 Aug 2001
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Stress-regulated genes of plants, transgenic plants
containing same, and methods of use
|
Claim 1
A method of identifying a stress condition to which a plant cell has been
exposed, the method comprising: a) contacting nucleic acid molecules
representative of expressed polynucleotides in the plant cell with an array of
probes representative of the plant cell genome; and b) detecting a profile
of expressed polynucleotides in the plant cell characteristic of a stress
response, thereby identifying the stress condition to which the plant cell was
exposed.
|
|
Claim 18
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an
abiotic stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a plant
stress-regulated gene, provided said gene does not comprise a
nucleotide sequence of a polynucleotide as set forth in any of SEQ ID
NOS:156, 229, 233, 558, 573, 606, 635, 787, 813, 1263, 1386, 1391, 1405, 1445,
1484, 1589, 1609, 1634, 1726, 1866, 1918 or 1928, or a nucleotide
sequence complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic
acid probe, or detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as
compared to a level of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid
molecules representative of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known
not have been exposed to an abiotic stress, indicates that the test plant has
been exposed to an abiotic stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an abiotic stress.
|
|
Claim 22
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557, 559-572,
574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1261, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress,
and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress.
|
|
Claim 23
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:2226-2427, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a saline stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a saline stress.
|
|
Claim 24
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in two or more of SEQ ID NOS:2428-2585, or a nucleotide
sequence complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
an osmotic stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 25
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a
combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a combination of stress conditions, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a combination of abiotic stress conditions, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a combination of abiotic
stress conditions.
|
|
Claim 30
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1699-1969, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress and an osmotic stress, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress and an
osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 31
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and a saline stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1970-2226, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress and a saline stress, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress and a saline
stress.
|
|
Claim 32
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress and a saline stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe under
conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary nucleotide
sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:2586-2703, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
an osmotic stress and a saline stress, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to an osmotic stress and a saline stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an osmotic stress and a
saline stress.
|
|
Claim 33
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with a plurality of
nucleic acid probes under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a
complementary nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1262-1698, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress, a saline stress, and an osmotic stress, indicates that the test
plant has been exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress,
and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress, a saline
stress and an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 34
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-229, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-634, 636-786, 788812, and 814-1261 in cells of
the test plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than at least about two-fold
different from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells
of a plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that
is at least two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress.
|
|
Claim 35
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:2226-2427 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a saline stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a saline stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
at least about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a saline stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a saline stress.
|
|
Claim 36
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:2428-2585 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to an osmotic stress, or detecting a level of expression that
is less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to an osmotic stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant
not exposed to an osmotic stress, or detecting a level of expression that is at
least about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to an osmotic stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 37
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1699-1969 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is less than about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has
been exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from as a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is at least about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has not
been exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 38
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and a saline stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1970-2226 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, or detecting a level of
expression that is less than about two-fold different from as a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, indicates the test plant has been
exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from as a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, or detecting a level of
expression that is at least about two-fold different from a level of expression
of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a
cold stress and a saline stress, indicates the test plant has not been exposed
to a cold stress and a saline stress.
|
|
Claim 39
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:2586-2703 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is less than about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has
been exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is at least about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to saline stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has not
been exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 40
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-229, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-634, 636-786, 788812, and 814-1261 in cells of
the test plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
at least about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress.
|
|
Claim 41
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1262-1698 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different from
a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant
known to be exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and
an osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different from a
level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known
to be exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, indicates
the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an
osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 42
A method of producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit
altered responsiveness to at least one stress condition, the method comprising
-
introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant
stress-regulated gene into a plant cell genome, wherein the polynucleotide
portion of the stress-regulated gene does not comprise a nucleotide sequence as
set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:156, 229, 233, 558, 573, 606, 635, 787, 813,
1263, 1386, 1391, 1405, 1445, 1484, 1589, 1609, 1634, 1726, 1866, 1918 or 1928,
whereby the polynucleotide portion of the plant stress-regulated gene modulates
a response of the plant cells to at least one stress condition, thereby
producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit altered
responsiveness to the stress condition.
|
|
Claim 46
A method of producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit
altered responsiveness to a combination of at least two stress conditions, the
method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into a
plant cell genome, whereby the polynucleotide portion of the plant
stress-regulated gene modulates a response of the plant cells to a combination
of at least two stress conditions, thereby producing a transgenic plant
comprising plant cells that exhibit altered responsiveness to the stress
conditions.
|
|
Claim 85
A method of selecting a plant having an altered resistance to an abiotic
stress condition or a combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method
comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in a plant cell of a plant to be examined for having an altered
resistance to an abiotic stress with a nucleic acid probes that selectively
hybridizes under stringent conditions to a plant stress-regulated gene
comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID
NO:1-5379;
b) detecting a level of selective hybridization of the nucleic acid probes to
a nucleic acid molecule representative of an expressed polynucleotide in the
plant cell, wherein the level of selective hybridization corresponds to the
level of the expressed polynucleotide in the plant cell, which is indicative of
resistance of the plant to an abiotic stress; and
c) selecting a plant having a level of expression of a polynucleotide
indicative of altered resistance to an abiotic stress condition.
|
| Claim 96
A method of modulating the responsiveness of a plant cell to a stress
condition, the method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into
the plant cell, wherein said gene comprises a nucleotide sequence of a
polynucleotide as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232,
234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262, 1264-1386,
1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608, 1610-1633,
1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932,
2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511,
3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299,
4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379, thereby modulating
the responsiveness of the plant cell to a stress condition.
|
| Claim 115
A method of expressing a heterologous nucleotide sequence in a plant cell,
the method comprising
- introducing into the plant cell a plant stress-regulated regulatory
element operatively linked to the
heterologous nucleotide sequence, wherein said regulatory
element comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID
NOS:2704-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323,
3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136,
4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and
4604-5379, whereby, upon exposure of the plant cell to stress
condition, the heterologous nucleotide sequence is expressed in the plant cell.
|
| Claim 119
A method of modulating the activity of a biological pathway in a plant cell
involving a plant stress-regulated polypeptide, the method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into
the plant cell, wherein the plant stress-regulated gene comprises a nucleotide
sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262, 1264-1386, 1387-1390,
1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608, 1610-1633, 1634-1725,
1727-1865,1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256,
3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956,
3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324,
4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379, thereby modulating the activity
of the biological pathway.
|
| Claim 122
A method of identifying a polynucleotide that modulates a stress response in
a plant cell, the methods comprising:
a) contacting an array of probes representative of a plant cell genome and
nucleic acid molecules expressed in plant cell exposed to the stress;
b) detecting a nucleic acid molecule that is expressed at a level different
from a level of expression in the absence of the stress;
c) introducing the nucleic acid molecule of step b) into a plant cell; and
d) detecting a modulated response of the plant cell of step c) to a stress,
thereby identifying a polynucleotide that modulates a stress response in a plant
cell.
|
| Claim 127
A transgenic plant, which contains a transgene comprising a polynucleotide
portion of plant stress-regulated gene, wherein the gene comprises
- a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228,
230-232, 234-SS7, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262,
1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608,
1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928,
2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485,
3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279,
4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379.
|
| Claim 142
A plant stress-regulated gene regulatory element, wherein the gene comprises
- a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157228,
230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262,
1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608,
1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928,
2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485,
3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279,
4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379.
|
| Claim 154
A method for identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of a
plant, the method comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in plant cells of a plant exposed to a stress condition or
combination of stress conditions with an array of probes representative of the
plant cell genome; and
b) detecting a nucleic acid molecule that exhibits at least a two-fold change
in the level of expression as compared to the level of the nucleic acid molecule
in a corresponding plant cell of a plant that was not exposed to the stress
condition, thereby identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of
the plant.
|
| Claim 157
A computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable
instructions for performing a method comprising:
a) receiving data on expression in a cell of a plant of a nucleic acid
molecule having at least 70% sequence identity to a nucleotide sequence
comprising any of SEQ ID NO. 1-5379; and
b) comparing the data on expression of the nucleic acid molecule with data on
expression of the nucleic acid in a cell of a plant that has not been exposed to
an abiotic stress, of a plant that has been exposed to an abiotic stress
condition or combination of abiotic stress conditions, or of a combination of
such plants.
|
| Claim 159
A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising:
- sequence data for at least one nucleic acid molecule having at least 70%
nucleic acid sequence identity to a polynucleotide having a nucleotide sequence
as set forth in any of SEQ ID NO. 1-5379 or a nucleotide sequence complementary
thereto; and
- a module receiving the nucleic acid molecule sequence data, which compares
the nucleic acid molecule sequence data to a least one other nucleic acid
sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of identifying a stress condition to which a plant cell has been
exposed (claim 1)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress (claim 18; 22, 34 and 40: cold stress; 23 and 35: saline stress; 24 and
36: osmotic stress)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a
combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 25; 30 and 37: cold and osmotic
stress; 31 and 38: cold and saline stress; 32 and 39: osmotic and saline stress;
33 and 41: cold, saline and osmotic stress)
- a method of producing a transgenic plant that exhibit altered responsiveness
to at least one stress condition (claim 42)
- a method of producing a transgenic plant that exhibit altered responsiveness
to at least two stress conditions (claim 46)
- a method for monitoring a population of plants for exposure to a stress
condition or a combination of stress conditions (claim 68)
- a method of selecting a plant having an altered resistance to an abiotic
stress condition or a combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 85)
- a method of modulating the responsiveness of a plant cell to a stress
condition (claim 96)
- a method of expressing a heterologous nucleotide sequence in a plant cell
(claim 115)
- a method of modulating the activity of a biological pathway in a plant cell
involving a plant stress-regulated polypeptide (claim 119)
- a method of identifying a polynucleotide that modulates a stress response in
a plant cell (claim 122)
- a transgenic plant containing a transgene comprising a polynucleotide
portion of plant stress-regulated gene (claim 127)
- a plant stress-regulated gene regulatory element (claim 142)
- a method for identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of a
plant (claim 154)
- a computor readable medium having stored executable instructions for
comparing data on expression in a cell of a plant (claim 157)
- a computor readable medium having stored a data structure comprising
sequence data and a module (claim 159)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Abiotic stress - exposure of a plant, plant cell, or the like, to a
non-living ("abiotic") physical or chemical agent or condition that has an
adverse effect on metabolism, growth, development, propagation and/or survival
of the plant (collectively "growth").
- SEQ ID NOS:156, 229, 233, 558, 573, 606, 635, 787, 813, 1263, 1386, 1391,
1405, 1445, 1484, 1589, 1609, 1634, 1726, 1866, 1918 or 1928 - (polynucleotides
that) previously have been described as being involved in a stress-regulated
response in plants... and, therefore, are not encompassed, in whole or in part,
within the compositions of the invention...
- SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634,
636-786, 788-812, 814-1261 (SEQ ID NOS 1-1261 excluding ones previously
described, see dot point above) - cold responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:2226 - 2427 - saline responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:2428 - 2585 - osmotic responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:1699 - 1969 - cold and osmotic responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:1970 - 2226 - cold and saline responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:2586 - 2703 - osmotic and saline responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:1262 - 1698 - cold, osmotic and saline responsive genes
- SEQ ID NOS:1 - 5379 - this list is categorised into two groups: SEQ ID NOS:1
- 2703 - stress-regulated polypeptide or functional peptide portion thereof; SEQ
ID NOS:2704 - 5379 - stress-regulated gene regulatory element
- SEQ ID NOS:2704-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304,
3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097,
4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552,
4554-4602, and 4604-5379 - stress-regulated gene regulatory elements excluding
those for which the corresponding stress responsive genes have been previously
described.
- Plant stress-regulated gene - a polynucleotide sequence of a plant, the
transcription of which is altered in response to exposure to a stress condition,
and the regulatory elements linked to such a polynulceotide sequence and
involved in the stress response, which can be induction or repression.
- Regulatory element - a nucleotide sequence that, when operatively linked to
a coding region of a genes, affects transcription of the coding region such that
a ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecule is transcribed from the coding region.
- Plant stress-regulated regulatory element - a nucleotide sequence of a plant
genome that can respond to a stress such that expression of a gene product
encoded by a gene comprising the regulatory element (a stress-inducible gene) is
increased above or decreased below the level of expression of the gene product
in the absence of the stress condition.
- Operatively linked (in reference to a regulatory element) - the regulatory
element is positioned with respect to a second nucleotide sequence such that the
regulatory element affects transcription or transcription and translation of the
nucleotide sequence in substantially the same manner, but not necessarily to the
same extent, as is does when the regulatory element is present in its natural
position in a genome.
- Heterologous nucleotide sequence - a nucleotide sequence that is not
normally part of the plant stress-regulated gene from which the polynucleotide
portion of the plant stress-regulated gene-component of the recombinant
polynucleotide is obtained; or, if it is a part of the plant stress-regulated
gene from which the polynucleotide portion is obtained, it is an orientation
other than it would normall be in...
- Introducing (a polynucleotide portion) - transferring a polynucleotide into
a plant cell. The method is not limited to Agrobacterium-mediated
transformation.
- At least one (nucleic acid probe) - includes one, two, three or more...
- Pluarity (of nucleic acid probes) - two or more...
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
Dependent claims 144-149 are generally drawn towards a method to identify
agents by use of transgenic bioreporter systems (which corresponds to dependent
claims 146-151 in WO 2002/16655, see below for content).
|
Scripps Research Institute
10550 NORTH TORREY PINES ROAD LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037
Syngenta Participations AG
SCHWARZWALDALLEE 215 CH-4058 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
(US only)
GROENEWOUDSEWEG 1 EINDHOVEN, NETHERLANDS 5621
|
|
US
2002/160378
US
2004/009476 (corrected publication)
- Earliest priority - 24 Aug 2000
- Filed - 24 Aug 2001
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Stress-regulated genes of plants, transgenic plants
containing same, and methods of use
Claim 1
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress condition, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605,
607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1261, 2227-2585, 2704-2857-2928, 2930-2932,
2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511,
3313-3955, and 4910-5263, or a nucleotide sequence complementary thereto,
whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
an abiotic stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress condition, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an abiotic stress
condition.
|
Claim 5
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a
combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1262-2226, 2586-2703, 3956-4909, and 5264-5379, or a
nucleotide sequence complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a combination of stress conditions, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a combination of abiotic stress conditions, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a combination of abiotic
stress conditions.
|
Claim 12
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress condition or combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method
comprising
detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232,
234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262, 1264-1386,
1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608, 1610-1633,
1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932,
2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511,
3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299,
4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379, in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to an abiotic stress or combination of abiotic stresses, or
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different from
a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant
known to be exposed to an abiotic stress or combination of abiotic stresses,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to an abiotic stress or combination of
abiotic stresses, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than at least about two-fold
different from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells
of a plant not exposed to an abiotic stress or combination of abiotic stresses,
or detecting a level of expression that is at least two-fold different from a
level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known
to be exposed to an abiotic stress or combination of abiotic stresses, indicates
the test plant has not been exposed to an abiotic stress or combination of
abiotic stresses.
|
Claim 20
A method of identifying a stress condition to which a plant cell has been
exposed, the method comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in the plant cell with an array of probes representative of the
plant cell genome; and
b) detecting a profile of expressed polynucleotides in the plant cell
characteristic of a stress response, thereby identifying the stress condition to
which the plant cell was exposed.
|
Claim 29
A method of producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit
altered responsiveness to at least one stress condition, the method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into a
plant cell genome, wherein
the polynucleotide portion of the stress-regulated gene comprises a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of 1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262, 1264-1386, 1387-1390,
1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608, 1610-1633, 1634-1725,
1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256,
3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956,
3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324,
4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379, whereby the polynucleotide
portion of the plant stress-regulated gene modulates a response of the plant
cells to at least one stress condition, thereby producing a transgenic plant
comprising plant cells that exhibit altered responsiveness to the stress
condition.
|
Claim 46
A transgenic plant, which contains a transgene comprising a polynucleotide
portion of plant stress-regulated gene, wherein the gene comprises
- a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228,
230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262,
1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608,
1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928,
2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485,
3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279,
4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379.
|
Claim 58
A plant stress-regulated gene regulatory element, wherein the gene comprises
- a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228,
230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262,
1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608,
1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928,
2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485,
3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279,
4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379.
|
Claim 66
A method of selecting a plant having an altered resistance to an abiotic
stress condition or a combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method
comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in a plant cell of a plant to be examined for having an altered
resistance to an abiotic stress with a nucleic acid probe that selectively
hybridizes under stringent conditions to a plant stress-regulated gene
comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NO:1-155,
157-228, 230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812,
814-1262, 1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588,
1590-1608, 1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855,
2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333,
3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175,
4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379;
b) detecting a level of selective hybridization of the nucleic acid probes to
a nucleic acid molecule representative of an expressed polynucleotide in the
plant cell, wherein the level of selective hybridization corresponds to the
level of the expressed polynucleotide in the plant cell, which is indicative of
resistance of the plant to an abiotic stress; and
c) selecting a plant having a level of expression of a polynucleotide
indicative of altered resistance to an abiotic stress condition.
|
Claim 75
A method for identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of a
plant, the method comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in plant cells of a plant exposed to a stress condition or
combination of stress conditions with an array of probes representative of the
plant cell genome; and
b) detecting a nucleic acid molecule that exhibits at least a two-fold change
in the level of expression as compared to the level of the nucleic acid molecule
in a corresponding plant cell of a plant that was not exposed to the stress
condition, thereby identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of
the plant.
|
Claim 78
A computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable
instructions for performing a method comprising:
a) receiving data on expression in a cell of a plant of a nucleic acid
molecule having at least 70% sequence identity to a nucleotide sequence
comprising any of SEQ ID NO. 1-5379; and
b) comparing the data on expression of the nucleic acid molecule with data on
expression of the nucleic acid in a cell of a plant that has not been exposed to
an abiotic stress, of a plant that has been exposed to an abiotic stress
condition or combination of abiotic stress conditions, or of a combination of
such plants.
|
Claim 79
A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising:
- sequence data for at least one nucleic acid molecule having at least 70%
nucleic acid sequence identity to a polynucleotide having a nucleotide sequence
as set forth in any of SEQ ID NO. 1-5379 or a nucleotide sequence complementary
thereto; and
- a module receiving the nucleic acid molecule sequence data, which compares
the nucleic acid molecule sequence data to a least one other nucleic acid
sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress condition (claim 1)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a
combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 5)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress condition or combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 12)
- a method of identifying a stress condition to which a plant cell has been
exposed (claim 20)
- a method of producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit
altered responsiveness to at least one stress condition (claim 29)
- a transgenic plant, which contains a transgene comprising a polynucleotide
portion of plant stress-regulated gene (claim 46)
- a plant stress-regulated gene regulatory element (claim 58)
- a method of selecting a plant having an altered resistance to an abiotic
stress condition or a combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 66)
- a method for identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of a
plant (claim 75)
- A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising
sequence data and a module (claim 79)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2420555.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
Dependent claims 71-74 are generally drawn towards a method to identify
agents by use of stress-responsive regulatory elements linked to nucleotide
sequences coding for reporter molecules (which corresponds to dependent claims
146-149 in WO2002/16655, see below for content).
|
|
WO
2002/16655 A2
WO
2002/16655 A2 R6
(corrected
publication)
- Earliest priority - 24 Aug 2000
- Filed - 24 Aug 2001
- Published - 28 Feb 2002
- Corrected - 9 Jan 2003
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Stress-regulated genes of plants, transgenic plants
containing same, and methods of use
|
Claim 1
A method of identifying a stress condition to which a plant cell has been
exposed, the method comprising: a) contacting nucleic acid molecules
representative of expressed polynucleotides in the plant cell with an array of
probes representative of the plant cell genome; and b) detecting a profile
of expressed polynucleotides in the plant cell characteristic of a stress
response, thereby identifying the stress condition to which the plant cell was
exposed.
|
|
Claim 18
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an
abiotic stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a plant
stress-regulated gene, provided said gene does not comprise a
nucleotide sequence of a polynucleotide as set forth in any of SEQ ID
NOS:156, 229, 233, 558, 573, 606, 635, 787, 813, 1263, 1386, 1391, 1405, 1445,
1484, 1589, 1609, 1634, 1726, 1866, 1918 or 1928,or a nucleotide
sequence complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic
acid probe, or detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as
compared to a level of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid
molecules representative of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known
not have been exposed to an abiotic stress, indicates that the test plant has
been exposed to an abiotic stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an abiotic stress.
|
|
Claim 22
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557, 559-572,
574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1261, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress,
and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress.
|
|
Claim 23
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:2226-2427, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a saline stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a saline stress.
|
|
Claim 24
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in two or more of SEQ ID NOS:2428-2585, or a nucleotide
sequence complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
an osmotic stress, indicates that the test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 25
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a
combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a combination of stress conditions, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a combination of abiotic stress conditions, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a combination of abiotic
stress conditions.
|
|
Claim 30
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1699-1969, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress and an osmotic stress, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress and an
osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 31
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and a saline stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe
under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary
nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1970-2226, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress and a saline stress, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress and a saline
stress.
|
|
Claim 32
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress and a saline stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in the test plant with at least one nucleic acid probe under
conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a complementary nucleotide
sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:2586-2703, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
an osmotic stress and a saline stress, indicates that the test plant has been
exposed to an osmotic stress and a saline stress, and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to an osmotic stress and a
saline stress.
|
|
Claim 33
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in cells of the test plant with a plurality of
nucleic acid probes under conditions suitable for selective hybridization to a
complementary nucleotide sequence, wherein
the probe comprises at least 15 nucleotides of a nucleotide sequence as set
forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1262-1698, or a nucleotide sequence
complementary thereto, whereby
detecting selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe, or
detecting a change in a level of selective hybridization as compared to a level
of selective hybridization obtained using nucleic acid molecules representative
of expressed polynucleotides in cells of a plant known not have been exposed to
a cold stress, a saline stress, and an osmotic stress, indicates that the test
plant has been exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress,
and whereby
an absence of selective hybridization of at least one nucleic acid probe
indicates that the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress, a saline
stress and an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 34
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-229, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-634, 636-786, 788812, and 814-1261 in cells of
the test plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than at least about two-fold
different from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells
of a plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that
is at least two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress.
|
|
Claim 35
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:2226-2427 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a saline stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a saline stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
at least about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a saline stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a saline stress.
|
|
Claim 36
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an osmotic
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:2428-2585 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to an osmotic stress, or detecting a level of expression that
is less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to an osmotic stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant
not exposed to an osmotic stress, or detecting a level of expression that is at
least about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to an osmotic stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 37
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1699-1969 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is less than about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has
been exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from as a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is at least about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has not
been exposed to a cold stress and an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 38
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress and a saline stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1970-2226 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, or detecting a level of
expression that is less than about two-fold different from as a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, indicates the test plant has been
exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from as a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress and a saline stress, or detecting a level of
expression that is at least about two-fold different from a level of expression
of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a
cold stress and a saline stress, indicates the test plant has not been exposed
to a cold stress and a saline stress.
|
|
Claim 39
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a saline
stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:2586-2703 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is less than about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has
been exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or detecting a level
of expression that is at least about two-fold different from a level of
expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be
exposed to saline stress and an osmotic stress, indicates the test plant has not
been exposed to a saline stress and an osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 40
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-229, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-634, 636-786, 788812, and 814-1261 in cells of
the test plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
less than about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least
one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, or detecting a level of expression that is
at least about two-fold different from a level of expression of the at least one
polynucleotide in cells of a plant known to be exposed to a cold stress,
indicates the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress.
|
|
Claim 41
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a cold
stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, the method comprising
- detecting a level of expression of at least one polynucleotide comprising a
nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1262-1698 in cells of the test
plant, wherein
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different from
a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant
known to be exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress,
indicates the test plant has been exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and
an osmotic stress, or wherein
detecting a level of expression that is less than about two-fold different
from a level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a
plant not exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, or
detecting a level of expression that is at least about two-fold different from a
level of expression of the at least one polynucleotide in cells of a plant known
to be exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an osmotic stress, indicates
the test plant has not been exposed to a cold stress, a saline stress and an
osmotic stress.
|
|
Claim 42
A method of producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit
altered responsiveness to at least one stress condition, the method comprising
-
introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant
stress-regulated gene into a plant cell genome, wherein the polynucleotide
portion of the stress-regulated gene does not comprise a nucleotide sequence as
set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:156, 229, 233, 558, 573, 606, 635, 787, 813,
1263, 1386, 1391, 1405, 1445, 1484, 1589, 1609, 1634, 1726, 1866, 1918 or 1928,
whereby the polynucleotide portion of the plant stress-regulated gene modulates
a response of the plant cells to at least one stress condition, thereby
producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit altered
responsiveness to the stress condition.
|
|
Claim 46
A method of producing a transgenic plant comprising plant cells that exhibit
altered responsiveness to a combination of at least two stress conditions, the
method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into a
plant cell genome, whereby the polynucleotide portion of the plant
stress-regulated gene modulates a response of the plant cells to a combination
of at least two stress conditions, thereby producing a transgenic plant
comprising plant cells that exhibit altered responsiveness to the stress
conditions.
|
|
Claim 85
A method of selecting a plant having an altered resistance to an abiotic
stress condition or a combination of abiotic stress conditions, the method
comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in a plant cell of a plant to be examined for having an altered
resistance to an abiotic stress with a nucleic acid probes that selectively
hybridizes under stringent conditions to a plant stress-regulated gene
comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID
NO:1-5379;
b) detecting a level of selective hybridization of the nucleic acid probes to
a nucleic acid molecule representative of an expressed polynucleotide in the
plant cell, wherein the level of selective hybridization corresponds to the
level of the expressed polynucleotide in the plant cell, which is indicative of
resistance of the plant to an abiotic stress; and
c) selecting a plant having a level of expression of a polynucleotide
indicative of altered resistance to an abiotic stress condition.
|
| Claim 96
A method of modulating the responsiveness of a plant cell to a stress
condition, the method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into
the plant cell, wherein said gene comprises a nucleotide sequence of a
polynucleotide as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232,
234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262, 1264-1386,
1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608, 1610-1633,
1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932,
2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511,
3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299,
4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379, thereby modulating
the responsiveness of the plant cell to a stress condition.
|
| Claim 117
A method of expressing a heterologous nucleotide sequence in a plant cell,
the method comprising
- introducing into the plant cell a plant stress-regulated regulatory
element operatively linked to the
heterologous nucleotide sequence, wherein said regulatory
element comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID
NOS:2704-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323,
3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136,
4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and
4604-5379, whereby, upon exposure of the plant cell to stress
condition, the heterologous nucleotide sequence is expressed in the plant cell.
|
| Claim 121
A method of modulating the activity of a biological pathway in a plant cell
involving a plant stress-regulated polypeptide, the method comprising
- introducing a polynucleotide portion of a plant stress-regulated gene into
the plant cell, wherein the plant stress-regulated gene comprises a nucleotide
sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228, 230-232, 234-557,
559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262, 1264-1386, 1387-1390,
1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608, 1610-1633, 1634-1725,
1727-1865,1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928, 2930-2932, 2934-3256,
3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485, 3487-3511, 3313-3956,
3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279, 4281-4299, 4301-4324,
4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379, thereby modulating the activity
of the biological pathway.
|
| Claim 124
A method of identifying a polynucleotide that modulates a stress response in
a plant cell, the methods comprising:
a) contacting an array of probes representative of a plant cell genome and
nucleic acid molecules expressed in plant cell exposed to the stress;
b) detecting a nucleic acid molecule that is expressed at a level different
from a level of expression in the absence of the stress;
c) introducing the nucleic acid molecule of step b) into a plant cell; and
d) detecting a modulated response of the plant cell of step c) to a stress,
thereby identifying a polynucleotide that modulates a stress response in a plant
cell.
|
| Claim 129
A transgenic plant, which contains a transgene comprising a polynucleotide
portion of plant stress-regulated gene, wherein the gene comprises
- a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157-228,
230-232, 234-SS7, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262,
1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608,
1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928,
2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485,
3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279,
4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379.
|
| Claim 144
A plant stress-regulated gene regulatory element, wherein the gene comprises
- a nucleotide sequence as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:1-155, 157228,
230-232, 234-557, 559-572, 574-605, 607-634, 636-786, 788-812, 814-1262,
1264-1386, 1387-1390, 1392-1404, 1406-1444, 1446-1483, 1485-1588, 1590-1608,
1610-1633, 1634-1725, 1727-1865, 1867-1917, 1919-1927, 1929-2855, 2857-2928,
2930-2932, 2934-3256, 3258-3271, 3273-3304, 3306-3323, 3325-3333, 3335-3485,
3487-3511, 3313-3956, 3958-4078, 4080-4097, 4099-4136, 4138-4175, 4177-4279,
4281-4299, 4301-4324, 4326-4414, 4416-4552, 4554-4602, and 4604-5379.
|
| Claim 156
A method for identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of a
plant, the method comprising:
a) contacting nucleic acid molecules representative of expressed
polynucleotides in plant cells of a plant exposed to a stress condition or
combination of stress conditions with an array of probes representative of the
plant cell genome; and
b) detecting a nucleic acid molecule that exhibits at least a two-fold change
in the level of expression as compared to the level of the nucleic acid molecule
in a corresponding plant cell of a plant that was not exposed to the stress
condition, thereby identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of
the plant.
|
| Claim 159
A computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable
instructions for performing a method comprising:
a) receiving data on expression in a cell of a plant of a nucleic acid
molecule having at least 70% sequence identity to a nucleotide sequence
comprising any of SEQ ID NO. 1-5379; and
b) comparing the data on expression of the nucleic acid molecule with data on
expression of the nucleic acid in a cell of a plant that has not been exposed to
an abiotic stress, of a plant that has been exposed to an abiotic stress
condition or combination of abiotic stress conditions, or of a combination of
such plants.
|
| Claim 161
A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising:
- sequence data for at least one nucleic acid molecule having at least 70%
nucleic acid sequence identity to a polynucleotide having a nucleotide sequence
as set forth in any of SEQ ID NO. 1-5379 or a nucleotide sequence complementary
thereto; and
- a module receiving the nucleic acid molecule sequence data, which compares
the nucleic acid molecule sequence data to a least one other nucleic acid
sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of identifying a stress condition to which a plant cell has been
exposed (claim 1)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to an abiotic
stress (claim 18; 22, 34 and 40: cold stress; 23 and 35: saline stress; 24 and
36: osmotic stress)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to a
combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 25; 30 and 37: cold and osmotic
stress; 31 and 38: cold and saline stress; 32 and 39: osmotic and saline stress;
33 and 41: cold, saline and osmotic stress)
- a method of producing a transgenic plant that exhibit altered responsiveness
to at least one stress condition (claim 42)
- a method of producing a transgenic plant that exhibit altered responsiveness
to at least two stress conditions (claim 46)
- a method for monitoring a population of plants for exposure to a stress
condition or a combination of stress conditions (claim 68)
- a method of selecting a plant having an altered resistance to an abiotic
stress condition or a combination of abiotic stress conditions (claim 85)
- a method of modulating the responsiveness of a plant cell to a stress
condition (claim 96)
- a method of expressing a heterologous nucleotide sequence in a plant cell
(claim 117)
- a method of modulating the activity of a biological pathway in a plant cell
involving a plant stress-regulated polypeptide (claim 121)
- a method of identifying a polynucleotide that modulates a stress response in
a plant cell (claim 124)
- a transgenic plant containing a transgene comprising a polynucleotide
portion of plant stress-regulated gene (claim 129)
- a plant stress-regulated gene regulatory element (claim 144)
- a method for identifying a polynucleotide involved in a stress response of a
plant (claim 156)
- a computor readable medium having stored executable instructions for
comparing data on expression in a cell of a plant (claim 159)
- a computor readable medium having stored a data structure comprising
sequence data and a module (claim 161)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2420555.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
Dependent claims 146-151 are generally drawn towards a method to identify
agents by use of bioreporter systems as follows:
- a method to identify an agent that modulates the activity of the plant
stress-regulated regulatory element (claim 146),
- where the regulatory element may be linked to a heterologous nucleotide
sequence (claim 147),
- where the heterologous nucleotide sequence may encode for a reporter
molecule (claim 148),
- and the regulatory element/reporter system is in a plant (in vivo, in situ)
or in vitro (claim 149),
- where the plant (in claim 149) is a transgenic plant containing the
regulatory element/reporter gene (claim 150),
- that detects a stress mimicing agent (claim 151).
|
| Remarks |
- National phase entry of WO 2002/16655 in Australia (AU 2001/86811) is
pending.
- National phase entry of WO 2002/16655 in Europe (EP 1313867) is deemed to be
withdrawn on 26 Apr 2006.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
11/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Expert, stemming off
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
(sentinel near/5 plant) or (sentinel near/5 organism)
|
|
Results
|
9
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 9 results identified using these search terms, 6 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed by Syngenta
Participations AG
Technology overview
A research team lead by Dr Jeffrey F. Harper at the Torrey Mesa Research
Institute, Syngenta, used GeneChip microarray to conduct global expression
profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to cold, saline, and
osmotic stress (journal publication related to this technology is Kreps et
al. (2002). Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to
salt, osmotic, and cold stress.
Plant
Physiol. 130(4):2129-41). Identified genes and their regulatory elements,
and methods of their use were subsequently claimed in the PCT application
introduced in this section. The national phase entry of WO 2003/008540 in the
US (US 2006/075523) claims for stress-responsive polypeptides and corresponding
polynucleotides, but not for the associated regulatory elements that may be used
as promoters in a bioindicator system. Therefore the US patent application may
not be relevant to the scope of this technology landscape.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2006/075523
- Earliest priority - 22 Jun 2001
- Filed - 14 Sept 2005
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Abiotic stress responsive polynucleotides and
polypeptides
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CLAIM ANY
REGULATORY ELEMENTS THAT MAY ACT AS STRESS-INDUCIBLE PROMOTERS NOR REPORTER
ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE LINKED TO SUCH PROMOTER SEQUENCES. THEREFORE THIS PATENT
APPLICATION IS OUT OF THE SCOPE OF THIS LANDSCAPE.
Claim 1
An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a polynucleotide selected from
the group consisting of:
a) any one of the nucleotide sequences selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 1-4;
b) a functional portion of any of the sequences of a);
c) a polynucleotide that is substantially similar to a
sequence of a) or b);
d) a sequence of at least 15 nucletides that hybridizes under stringent
conditions to a polynucleotide of a), b) or c);
e) the complement of any sequence of a), b), c) or d);
f) the reverse complement of any sequence of a), b), c) or d);
g) a polynucleotide encoding any polypeptide selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 5-8; and
h) an allelic variant of any of the above.
|
Claim 26
An isolated polypeptide comprising:
a) any one of the amino acid sequences selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 5-8;
b) a functional portion of a);
c) an amino acid sequence substantially similar to any sequence of a) or b);
d) an amino acid sequence of a)-c) wherein there has been at least one
conservative amino acid substitution;
e) an allelic variant of any of a)-d).
|
Claim 27
A method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress
comprising
- introducing into said plant a recombinant nucleic acid construct comprising
at least one of the polynucleotides selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID
NOs. 1-4.
|
Claim 28
A method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress
comprising
- introducing into said plant a recombinant nucleic acid construct comprising
a polynucleotide of at least 15 nucleotides in length that hybridizes under high
stringency conditions to the complement of a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4.
|
Claim 30
A method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress
comprising
- introducing into said plant a recombinant nucleic acid construct, wherein
said construct encodes a molecule which alters expression of an abiotic
stress regulated coding region selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs.
1-4, or the complement thereof.
|
Claim 34
A method for selecting an agent that alters abiotic stress regulated
polynucleotide expression in a plant cell comprising:
- contacting at least one plant cell with a test agent;
- subjecting said plant cell to an abiotic stress before, during or after
contacting said plant cell with said test agent;
- obtaining an expression profile of said plant cell wherein said expression
profile comprises expression data for at least one abiotic stress regulated
sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4.;
- comparing the expression profile of said cell to the expression profile
obtained from at least one plant cell not exposed to said agent, but exposed to
said abiotic stress;
- selecting said agent if said agent alters expression of said abiotic stress
regulated sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a polynucleotide (claim 1)
- an isolated polypeptide (claim 26)
- a method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress (claim
27, 28, 30)
- a method for selecting an agent that alters abiotic stress regulated
polynucleotide expression in a plant cell (claim 34)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SEQ ID NOs. 1-4 - nucleotide sequence(s) containing a coding region for
abiotic stress responsive polypeptide(s)
- SEQ ID NOs. 5-8 - encoded polypeptide sequence(s) of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4
- Functional portion - a contiguous nucleotide sequence of the plant
stress-regulated sequence that provides a function within a plant or plant cell
- Substantially similar (nucleotide sequence) - a nucleotide sequence
corresponding to a reference nucleotide sequence, wherein the corresponding
sequence encodes a polypeptide having substantially the same structure and
function as the polypeptide encoded by the reference nucleotide sequence, e.g.,
where only changes in amino acids not affecting the polypeptide function occur
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
SEQ ID information from NCBI:
Based on the nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST search the four polynucleotide SEQ
IDs were identified as
- SEQ ID NO:1 - RNA polymerase B transcription factor 3 (BFT3); NCBI accession
no. AY224525
- SEQ ID NO:2 - Unknown protein, amino acid search for SEQ ID NO:6 identified
as containing the heavy metal associated domain (HMA); NCBI accession no.
NP918616
- SEQ ID NO:3 - Adenosine kinase-like protein; NCBI accession no. AY224510
- SEQ ID NO:4 - Putative farnesyltransferase (FT; amino acid search for SEQ ID
NO:8 identified as the beta subunit of FT); NCBI accession no. NM191123
|
Syngenta Participations AG
SCHWARZWALDALLEE 215 CH-4058 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
|
|
WO
2003/008540
- Earliest priority - 22 Jun 2001
- Filed - 21 Jun 2002
- Published - 30 Jan 2003
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Abiotic stress responsive polynucleotides and
polypeptides
Claim 1
An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a
polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of:
a) any one of the nucleotide sequences selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829 and 17505-17506;
b) a functional portion of any of the sequences of a); c) a polynucleotide
that is substantially similar to a sequence of a) or b);
d) a sequence of at least 15 nucletides that hybridizes under stringent
conditions to a polynucleotide of a), b) or c); e) the complement
of any sequence of a), b), c) or d); f) the reverse complement of any
sequence of a), b), c) or d); g) a polynucleotide encoding any polypeptide
selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 4132-8262, 8354-8444,
and 8830-9214; and h) an allelic variant of any of the above.
|
Claim 26
An isolated polypeptide comprising:
a) any one of the amino acid sequences selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 4132-8262, 8354-8444, and 8830-9214; b) a
functional portion of a); c) an amino acid sequence to any sequence of a)
or b); d) an amino acid sequence of a)-c) wherein there has been at least
one conservative amino acid substitution; e) an allelic variant of any of
a)-d).
|
Claim 34
A method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to at least
one abiotic stress condition comprising,
- determining expression of a plurality of polynucleotides selected from the
group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829 and 17505-17506 in
said test plant to produce an expression profile, and
- comparing said expression profile of said test plant to an expression
profile for the same plurality of polynucleotides in a reference plant exposed
to at least one abiotic stress.
|
Claim 48
A method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress
comprising
- introducing into said plant a recombinant nucleic acid construct comprising
at least one of the polynucleotides selected from the group consisting of SEQ lD
NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829, and 11374-17506.
|
CLaim 49
A method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress
comprising
- introducing into said plant a recombinant nucleic acid
construct comprising a polynucleotide of at least 15 nucleotides in length that
hybridizes under high stringency conditions to the complement
of a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131,
8263-8353, 8445-8829, and 17505-17506.
|
Claim 51
A method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress
comprising
- introducing into said plant a recombinant nucleic acid construct, wherein
said construct encodes a molecule which alters expression of an abiotic stress
regulated coding region selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829, and 17505-17506, or the complement
thereof.
|
Claim 55
A method for selecting an agent that alters abiotic stress regulated
polynucleotide expression in a plant cell comprising:
- contacting at least one plant cell with a test agent;
- subjecting said plant cell to an abiotic stress before, during or after
contacting said plant cell with said test agent;
- obtaining an expression profile of said plant cell wherein said expression
profile comprises expression data for at least one abiotic stress regulated
sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353,
8445-8829, and 17505-17506.;
- comparing the expression profile of said cell to the expression profile
obtained from at least one plant cell not exposed to said agent, but exposed to
said abiotic stress;
- selecting said agent if said agent alters expression of said abiotic stress
regulated sequence.
|
Claim 61
A computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable
instructions for performing a method comprising,
- receiving data on expression in a test plant of at least one polynucleotide
having at least 70% sequence identity to a nucleotide sequence selected from the
group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829, and 17505-17506,
or the complement thereof and
- comparing expression data from said test plant to expressin data for the
same at least one nucleic acid molecule in a plant which has been exposed to at
least one abiotic stress.
|
Claim 62
A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising,
- sequence data for at least one polynucleotide having at least 70% nucleic
acid sequence identity to a polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829, and 17505-17506, or the complement
thereof; and
- a module receiving the nucleic acid molecule sequence data which compares
the nucleic acid molecule sequence data to at least one other nucleic acid
sequence.
|
Claim 65
A method for identifying a homolog or ortholog to an abiotic stress
responsive polynucleotide comprising:
a) determining the nucleotide sequence of a plurality of isolated
polynucleotides to create a set of nucleotide sequences; b) translating the
nucleotide sequences in the set to derive one or more putative amino acid
sequences, based on one or more of the possible reading frames of the nucleotide
sequences and their complementary sequences; c) selecting an amino acid
sequence of an abiotic stress-responsive protein and comparing the amino acid
sequence of the abiotic stress-responsive protein with at least one of the
putative amino acid sequences; d) identifying putative amino acid sequences
having homology with at least a region of the amino acid sequence of the abiotic
stress-responsive protein; and e) correlating putative amino acid
sequences having said homology to translated nucleotide sequences of b).
|
Claim 68
A method for altering the expression of a polynucleotide in response to an
abiotic stress comprising
-
operably linking said polynucleotide to a
regulatory region selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NOs. 13374-17504.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a polynucleotide containing a
coding region for an abiotic stress responsive polypeptide (claim 1)
- an isolated polypeptide comprising a stress-regulated polypeptide (claim 26)
- a method for determining whether a test plant has been exposed to at least
one abiotic stress condition (claim 34)
- a method for altering the tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress (claim
48, 49, 51)
- a method for selecting an agent that alters abiotic stress regulated
polynucleotide expression in a plant cell (claim 55)
- a computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable
instructions for receiving and comparing expression data (claim 61)
- a computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising
sequence data and a module (claim 62)
- a method for identifying a homolog or ortholog to an abiotic stress
responsive polynucleotide (claim 65)
- a method for altering the expression of a polynucleotide in response to an
abiotic stress (claim 68)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SEQ ID NOs. 1-4131, 8263-8353, 8445-8829 and 17505-17506 - nucleotide
sequence(s) containing a coding region for an abiotic stress responsive
polypeptide
- SEQ ID NOs. 4132-8262, 8354-8444, and 8830-9214 - amino acid (polypeptide)
sequences of abiotic stress responsive polypeptides
- SEQ ID NOs. 13374-17504 - nucleotide sequences comprising regulatory
elements of nucleotide sequence(s) coding for abiotic stress responsive
polypeptides
- Isolated nucleic acid - nucleic acid sequence that is free of one or both of
the nucleotide sequences which flank the polynucleotide in the
naturally-occurring genome of the organism from which the polynucleotide is
derived
- Abiotic stress condition - exposure of a plant, plant cell, or the like, to
a non-living ("abiotic") physical or chemical agent or condition that has an
adverse effect on metabolism, growth, development, propagation and/or survival
of the plant (collectively "growth")
- Substantially similar (nucleotide sequence) - a nucleotide sequence
corresponding to a reference nucleotide sequence, wherein the corresponding
sequence encodes a polypeptide having substantially the same structure and
function as the polypeptide encoded by the reference nucleotide sequence, e.g.,
where only changes in amino acids not affecting the polypeptide function occur.
Specific hybridization conditions for this term is provided in the
specification.
- Substantially similar (polypeptide) - an amino acid sequence relative to a
reference (query) sequence shares at least about 65% amino acid sequence
identity, at least about 75% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 85%,
at least about 90% , or at least about 95% or greater amino acid sequence
identity
- Regulatory region - a nucleotide sequence that, when operatively linked to a
coding region, effects transcription of the coding region such that a
ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecule is transcribed from the coding region
- Operably link(ed) - the regulatory element is positioned with respect to a
second nucleotide sequence such that the regulatory element effects
transcription or transcription and translation of the nucleotide sequence in
substantially the same manner, but not necessarily to the same extent, as it
does when the regulatory element is present in its natural position in a genome
- Coding region - include(s) a nucleotide sequence of a genomic DNA or a cDNA
molecule comprising all or part of a coding region of the coding strand
- Stringent conditions - hybridizes (to the reference nucleotide sequence) in
7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO4, I mM EDTA at 50˚C with washing in
2X SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50˚C; in 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO4, 1 mM
EDTA at 50˚C with washing in lx SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50˚C
- Highly stringent conditions - hybridizes (to the reference nucleotide
sequence) in 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO4, 1 mM EDTA at 50˚C
with washing in 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50˚C (high stringency)
- Recombinant (nulceic acid) - one produced by human intervention in the
nucleotide sequence, typically selection or production
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
Scope of independent claim 68 includes bioreporter systems, where the
regulatory region of SEQ ID NOs. 13374-17504 may be linked to a polynucleotide
coding for a reporter gene, e.g. chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT),
beta-glucuronidase (GUS), green fluorescent protein (GFP), beta-galactosidase
(beta-GAL), luciferase.
|
| Remarks |
National phase entry of WO 2003/008540 in Europe (EP 1402042) is pending.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
11/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Expert, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
(sentinel near/5 plant) or (sentinel near/5 organism)
|
|
Results
|
9
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 9 results identified using these search terms, 6 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Detection of metal and other toxic compounds - Summary
The continuing increase in public concern on environmental
pollution from industrial and agricultural sources has encouraged scientists to
explore cost and time-effective alternatives to current chemistry-based methods
in detecting pollutants. Many of the up-to-date research in this field have
mainly been focusing on heavy metal (mercury, cadmium, zinc, copper etc.), and
fewer on organic compounds, where microorganisms are transformed with
pollutant-inducible promoters linked to reporter genes that can be easily
detected by change in colour or luminescence (Kohler (2000). Reporter gene
assays in environmental analysis.
Fresenius
J Anal Chem. 366:769-779).[add a comment]
This chapter introduces patent documents that contain claims
towards detection of metal and toxic compounds by use of transgenic organisms.
The following table lists the representative patent document, assignee,
detecting substance, regulatory element and reporter gene, and host organism
where applicable:[add a comment]
|
Patent document
|
Assignee
|
Detecting substance
|
regulatory element
|
reporter gene
|
host organism
|
|
WO 1992/15687
|
VITO
|
metal and xenobiotic compounds
|
Alcaligenes eutrophus
- derived promoters
|
luxCDABE |
not specified
|
|
WO 1997/41251
|
VITO
|
genotoxic compounds
|
SOS regulated promoters
|
reporter that emits light
|
not specified
|
|
EP 649905
|
Toyota Central R&D Lab.
|
mutagenic substances
|
SOS gene
|
(bacterial) luciferase
|
not specified
|
|
US 2006/8837
|
U. Tennessee
|
estrogenic agent
|
estrogen response element
|
luxAB |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
|
US 7090992
|
U. Tennessee
|
estrogenic agent
|
not specified
|
lux |
a collection of eukaryotic cells
|
|
US 6740521
|
Kaneka Corp, NIAIST
|
chemicals or natural toxins which disrupt or disturb homeostasis in organisms
|
hsp47 and SP1
|
reporter with SV40pA
|
not specified
|
|
US 2001/034039
|
Lee & Kim
|
toxic substances
|
none
|
luxAB
(constitutive expression)
|
Janthinobacterium lividum |
|
US 5877398
|
University of British Columbia
|
toxin
|
hsp16
promoter
|
lacZ |
Caenorhabditis elegans |
|
WO 1999/009202
|
Mangiarotti & Mangiarotti
|
toxic substances
|
not specified
|
not specified
|
Dictyostelium sp.
|
|
WO 2000/49150
|
University of Singapore
|
steroid hormone or a steroid hormone derivative
heavy metals
|
estrogen- or other steroid hormone-inducible promoter
heavy metal-inducible promoter
|
(gene coding for a) fluorescent or chemiluminescent protein
|
zebrafish
|
|
WO 1994/13831
|
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.
|
environmental insult
|
stress-inducible promoter
|
luxCDABE |
not specified (or E. coli for US and CA granted patents)
|
|
WO 1995/19446
|
Virta and Karp
|
(heavy) metal
|
promoter regulatable by a heavy metal
|
insect luciferase or a green fluorescent protein (GFP)
|
not specified
|
|
WO 1990/12887
|
Bio-Orbit Oy
|
factor that affects directly or indirectly the DNA, RNA and/or proteins of
the cell or the synthesis mechanisms
|
regulatable promoter
|
not specified
|
not specified
|
|
WO 2003/102223
|
EAWAG/UFZ
|
inorganic and organic pollutants
|
regulatory protein with at least two binding sites
|
not specified
|
not specified
|
There are other patent documents containing examples of transgenic
bioreporter organisms that detect heavy metals and other toxic compounds, most
of which are introduced in chapter 7: Biosensing systems due to the claim
language of the patent documents (claims are not limited to metal or toxic
compound detection).[add a comment]
Patent applications filed and patents owned by
VITO
Technology overview
VITO (Vlaamse instelling voor technologisch onderzoek, Flemish Institute for
Technological Research) is a research organization in Belgium with a focus on
contract research in the fields of energy, environment and materials
technology. The patent family described below by VITO discloses a fused gene
that contains an inducible promoter in the presence of metals and/or xenobiotic
compounds, and a luxCDABE operon as the reporter gene. Processes for
producing transgenic Escherichia coli containing the fused gene are
also claimed. Dr Philippe Corbisier and co-researchers used pMOL28 and pMOL30
(megaplasmids from Alcaligenes eutrophus CH34 that confer resistance to
several heavy metals) to isolate metal-indicuble promoters, fuse them to
luxCDABE and introduced the gene fusion into E. coli. Other
E. coli biosensors specific for chromium, nickel, copper and biphenyl
detection were created via conjugation of luxCDABE-containing E.
coli with particular A. eutrophus strains (SV661 for chromium,
AE453 for nickel, DS185 or DS310 for copper, and A5 for biphenyl). PCT
application WO 1992/15687 is cited in a review by van der Lelie et al.
(1994). The use of biosensors for environmental monitoring.
Res.
Microbiol. 145(1):67-74, and granted US patent US 5786162 is cited in a
review by Kohler et al. (2000). Reporter gene bioassays in
environmental analysis.
Fresenius
J. Anal. Chem. 366(6-7):769-79.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
CA 2105172
- Earliest priority - 1 Mar 1991
- Filed - 28 Feb 1992
- Granted - 15 Oct 2002
- Expected expiry - 28 Feb 2012
|
Title - Fused genes and their use for determining the
presence of metals or of xenobiotic compounds
Claim 1
A fused gene comprising
a promoter sequence derived from a gene of Alcaligenes eutrophus
strain CH34, SV661, DS185, AE453, or A5, said gene being a regulatory gene
involved in the expression of either the resistance to one or several metals or
the catabolism of one or several xenobiotic compounds, said promoter from said
regulatory gene being an inducible promoter and is inducible in the
presence of said metals or xenobiotic compounds, or both, and
downstream of the promoter, a five gene lux (CDABE)
operon said genes coding for subunit .alpha. and .beta. of luciferase, a fatty
acid reductase, an acyltransferase and an acylprotein synthase, said
operon being under the operational control of said promoter, wherein at
least one of said genes produces a detectable signal.
|
Claim 17
A process for preparing a bacterial cellular host wherein said bacterial
cellular host emits light in the presence of zinc with a detection limit of 1
ppm and dynamic ravage between 1 and 23 ppm zinc comprising the steps of:
(a) digesting with SalI a plasmid pBR325 comprising a czc fragment of plasmid
pMOL30 from Alcaligenes eutrophus strain CH34 and surrounding EcoRI
fragment to obtain a promoter and a gene encoding resistance to zinc; (b)
inserting said promoter and said gene encoding resistance to zinc of step
(a) into a plasmid pUCD615 (in E. coli CM600 deposited at the C.N.C.M.,
Institut Pasteur, rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, on Feb. 28, 1991, under No.
I-1050), at its multiple cloning site, and comprising the lux operon of
Vibrio fischeri, to obtain a replicable plasmid; (c) transforming
the replicable plasmid of (b) in E. coli; (d) selecting the
inserted plasmid on ampicillin plates with various concentrations of zinc; and
(e) detecting the light producing E. coli in the presence of
zinc.
|
Claim 18
A process for preparing a bacterial cellular host wherein said bacterial
cellular host emits light in the presence of cobalt with a detection limit of 1
ppm and dynamic range between 1 and 23 ppm cobalt comprising the steps of:
(a) digesting with SalI a plasmid pBR325 comprising a czc fragment of plasmid
pMOL30 from Alcaligenes eutrophus strain CH34 and surrounding EcoRI
fragment to obtain a promoter and a gene encoding resistance to cobalt;
(b) inserting said promoter and said gene encoding resistance to cobalt of step
(a) into a plasmid pUCD615 (in E. coli CM600 deposited at the C.N.C.M.
Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, on Feb. 28, 1991, under
No. I-1050), at its multiple cloning site, and comprising the lux
operon of Vibrio fischeri, to obtain a replicable plasmid; (c)
transforming the replicable plasmid of (b) in E. coli; (d)
selecting the inserted plasmid on ampicillin plates with various concentrations
of cobalt; and (e) detecting the light producing E. coli in the
presence of cobalt.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a fused gene comprising an inducible promoter by metals or xenobiotic
compounds, or both, and a lux (CDABE) operon (claim 1)
- a process for preparing a bacterial cellular host that emits light in the
presence of zinc (claim 17)
- a process for preparing a bacterial cellular host that emits light in the
presence of cobalt (claim 18)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- metal - (one designates) the transition metals, the rare earth, the elements
having metallic properties in the families lila, IVa, Va and VIa of the
Mendelieff table
- (said) operon being under the operational control of (said) promoter - the
promoter of the gene producing a detectable signal has been deleted
- inducible (promoter) in the presence of said metals - there is a minimum
concentration of said metal under which the promoter is not induced
-
lux (CDABE) - (in alphabetical order of the genes) genes coding for
subunit alpha and beta of luciferase, a fatty acid reductase, an acyltransferase
and an acylprotein synthase... can originate from Vibrio fischeri or
from Vibrio harveyi or from Photobacterium phosphoreum or from
Xenorhabdus luminescens
Comments:
Claim 1 recites a fused gene comprising an inducible promoter by metals or
xenobiotic compounds, or both, and a lux (CDABE) operon, which can be
used to transform any host organism. However, the origin of the inducible
promoter is limited to those of Alcaligenes eutrophus strain CH34,
SV661, DS185, AE453, or A5, which implies that a promoter that has the same
property but originates from an organism other than the Alcaligenes
eutrophus strains mentioned in claim 1 is not protected against use in this
particular patent.
|
VITO
BOERETANG 200 B-2400 MOL BELGIUM
Ph + 32 14 33 55 11 Fax + 32 14 33 55 99
vito@vito.be
|
|
EP
573500 B1
EP
573500 B2
- Earliest priority - 1 Mar 1991
- Filed - 28 Feb 1992
- Granted - 22 April 1998
- Modified - 2 May 2002
- Expected expiry - 28 Feb 2012
|
Title - Fused genes and their use for determining the
presence of metals or of xenobiotic compounds
Claim 1
Fused gene containing:
- a promoter sequence obtainable from (a) gene(s) of Alcaligenes
eutrophus and encoding either the resistance to one or several metal(s) or
the catabolism of one or several xenobiotic compound(s), said promoter being
inducible in the presence of said metal(s) or xenobiotic compound(s), or both,
- and downstream of the promoter, a five gene IuxCDABE operon,
said genes coding respectively for a fatty acid reductase, an acyl transferase,
two subunits Q and 3 of the luciferase and an acylprotein synthase, said
lux operon being under the operational control of said Alcaligenes
eutrophus promoter.
|
Claim 15
Transconjugants forming biosensors emitting light in the presence of metals
or xenobiotics characterized in that they are obtained by the conjugation of
Alcaligenes eutrophus and E. coli, wherein
- Alcaligenes eutrophus contains a gene encoding the resistance to a
metal or encoding the catabolism of a xenobiotic compound, and possibly a marker
of the presence of the gene, - E. coli contains a transposon
containing the luxCDABE operon of Vibrio fischeri without its
own promoter and possibly a marker of the presence of said gene.
|
Designated contracting States at the time of grant are: Austria (AT 165394),
Belgium, Switzerland, Germany (DE 69225221), Denmark (patent lapsed as reported
on EPO), Spain (ES 2117665), France, United Kingdom, Greece (patent lapsed as
reported on EPO), Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco (patent lapsed as
reported on INPADOC), Netherlands, Sweden
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a fused gene containing an inducible promoter by metals or xenobiotic
compounds, and a luxCDABE operon (claim 1)
- transconjugants forming biosensors emitting light in the presence of metals
or xenobiotics by the conjugation of Alcaligenes eutrophus and E.
coli (claim 15)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2105172.
Comments:
Claim 1 of EP 573500 does not have a limit on the type of Alcaligenes
eutrophus strain from which the inducible promoter is obtained.
|
|
US
5786162
- Earliest priority - 1 Mar 1991
- Filed - 28 Feb 1992
- Granted - 28 Jul 1998
- Expected expiry - 28 Jul 2015
|
Title - Fused genes and their use for determining the
presence of metals or of xenobiotic compounds
Claim 1
A fused gene comprising
a promoter sequence derived from a gene of Alcaligenes eutrophus
strain CH34, SV661, DS185, AE453, or A5, said gene being a regulatory gene
involved in the expression of either the resistance to one or several metals or
the catabolism of one or several xenobiotic compounds, said promoter from said
regulatory gene being an inducible promoter and is inducible in the presence of
said metals or xenobiotic compounds, or both, and
downstream of the promoter, a five gene lux (CDABE) operon said
genes coding for subunit α and β of luciferase, a fatty acid reductase, an
acyltransferase and an acylprotein synthase, said operon being under the
operational control of said promoter, wherein at least one of said genes
produces a detectable signal.
|
Claim 17
A process for preparing a bacterial cellular host wherein said bacterial
cellular host emits light in the presence of zinc with a detection limit of 1
ppm and dynamic range between 1 and 23 ppm zinc comprising the steps of:
(a) digesting with SalI a plasmid pBR325 comprising a czc fragment of plasmid
pMOL30 from Alcaligenes eutrophus strain CH34 and surrounding EcoRI
fragment to obtain a promoter and a gene encoding resistance to zinc;
(b) inserting said promoter and said gene encoding resistance to zinc of step
(a) into a plasmid pUCD615 (in E. coli CM600 deposited at the C.N.C.M.,
Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, on Feb. 28, 1991, under
No. I-1050), at its multiple cloning site, and comprising the lux
operon of Vibrio fischeri, to obtain a replicable plasmid;
(c) transforming the replicable plasmid of (b) in E. coli;
(d) selecting the inserted plasmid on ampicillin plates with various
concentrations of zinc; and
(e) detecting the light producing E. coli in the presence of
zinc.
|
Claim 18
A process for preparing a bacterial cellular host wherein said bacterial
cellular host emits light in the presence of cobalt with a detection limit of 1
ppm and dynamic range between 1 and 23 ppm cobalt comprising the steps of:
(a) digesting with SalI a plasmid pBR325 comprising a czc fragment of plasmid
pMOL30 from Alcaligenes eutrophus strain CH34 and surrounding EcoRI
fragment to obtain a promoter and a gene encoding resistance to cobalt;
(b) inserting said promoter and said gene encoding resistance to cobalt of step
(a) into a plasmid pUCD615 (in E. coli CM600 deposited at the C.N.C.M.
Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, on Feb. 28, 1991, under
No. I-1050), at its multiple cloning site, and comprising the lux
operon of Vibrio fischeri, to obtain a replicable plasmid; (c)
transforming the replicable plasmid of (b) in E. coli; (d)
selecting the inserted plasmid on ampicillin plates with various concentrations
of cobalt; and (e) detecting the light producing E. coli in the
presence of cobalt.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a fused gene comprising an inducible promoter by metals or xenobiotic
compounds, or both, and a lux (CDABE) operon (claim 1)
- a process for preparing an E. coli host that emits light in the
presence of zinc (claim 17)
- a process for preparing an E. coli host that emits light in the
presence of cobalt (claim 18)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2105172.
Comments:
The three independent claims in US 5786162 are the same as those of CA
2105172, both of which are narrower than the two independent claims of EP 573500
in terms of the limit on the type of Alcaligenes eutrophus strain from
which the inducible promoter is obtained, and the type of metals that the
recombinant E. coli can detect (zinc and cobalt).
|
|
WO
1992/15687
- Earliest priority - 1 Mar 1991
- Filed - 28 Feb 1992
- Published - 17 Sept 1992
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Fused genes and their use for determining the
presence of metals or of xenobiotic compounds
Claim 1
Fused gene containing :
- the promoter sequence of (a) gene(s) encoding the resistance to one or
several metal(s) or encoding the catabolism of one or several xenobiotic
compound(s), said promoter being inducible in the presence of said metal(s) or
xenobiotic compound(s), or both,
- and downstream the promoter, a gene producing a detectable signal such as
light emitting gene, said gene being under the control of said promoter, said
gene producing a detectable signal being located at a position such that the
induction of the promoter causes the transcription of the gene producing a
detectable signal and such that there is no terminator between the promoter and
the gene producing a detectable signal, said gene being such that it enables to
recycle fatty acid (which has been generated during the reaction responsible for
the detectable signal) into aldehyde.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a fused gene containing an inducible promoter by metals or xenobiotic
compounds or both, and a gene producing a detectable signal (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2105172.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
17/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
VITO in applicant
|
|
Results
|
3
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 3 results identified using these search terms, 3 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed by and patents owned
by VITO 2
Technology overview
This series of patent documents by VITO (Vlaamse instelling voor
technologisch onderzoek, Flemish Institute for Technological Research) describes
novel SOS regulated promoters that can be used to express reporter genes that
code for proteins that produce a signal that can be detected as light.
Promoters that were investigated for utility were wildtype and mutated recN
promoters from E. coli, which were fused to plasmid pMOL877 containig a
promoterless luxCDABE operon from Vibrio fischeri. The
specification compares their system to those of the SOS-Chromotest (genotoxicity
test using E. coli containing a sfiA::lacZ fusion gene;
Quillardet et al., Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79:5971-5975) and the
Ames Test (mutagenicity test using S. typhimurium mutant strains; Maron
and Ames,
Mutat.
Res. 1983, 113:173-215; Gee et al.,
Proc.Natl
Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91:11606-11610), and concludes that the novel promoter
systems disclosed here is more sensitive and results can be obtained in a
shorter amount of time.
The system disclosed in the patent documents in this section has been
comercialized (later improved with introduction of a control strain; technology
disclosed in another patent family filed by VITO - WO 1999/53092, see chapter 6:
Patent applications filed and patents owned by VITO 3) as the VITOTOX test. The
related journal publication of this technology is van der Lelie et al.
(1997). The VITOTOX test, an SOS bioluminescence Salmonella
typhimurium test to measure genotoxicity kinetics.
Mutat.
Res. 389(2-3):279-90.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
AU
724155
- Earliest priority - 25 Apr 1996
- Filed - 25 Apr 1996
- Granted - 14 Sept 2000
- Expected expiry - 25 Apr 2016
|
Title - Recombinant nucleic acid sequences and methods for
determining both genotoxicity and mutagenicity of a sample and the kinetics of
the genetoxicity
Claim 1
A recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated
promoter with an induction ratio higher than 40, said
promoter being operatively linked to a reporter encoding
nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a signal that can be
assayed as light production.
|
Claim 20
A method for determining the presence of multiple genotoxic compounds in a
sample, said method comprising the steps of
- culturing a host microorganism, said host microorganism comprising a
nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter, said promoter being
operatively linked to a reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a
reporter resulting in a signal that can be assayed as light production, -
measuring the luminescence of the culture, said measuring occurring at various
points in time, preferably continuously and determining the signal to noise
ratio at said points in time, plotting the data, said data representing the
kinetics of genotoxicity of said sample with multiple peaks being indicative of
multiple genotoxicity compounds with different induction kinetics.
|
Claim 21
A method for determining the presence of a genotoxic compound in a sample,
said method comprising the steps of
- culturing a host microorganism, said host microorganism comprising a
nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with an induction
ratio higher than 40, said promoter being operatively linked to a reporter
encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a signal that
can be assayed as light production, - measuring the luminescence of the
culture at multiple points in time, preferably continuously and -
determining whether the luminescence of the culture has changed, increased
luminescence being indicative of the presence of a genotoxic compound.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter
operably linked to a reporter (claim 1)
- a method for determining the presence of multiple genotoxic compounds in a
sample (claim 20)
- a method for determining the presence of a genotoxic compound in a sample
(claim 21)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SOS regulated promoter - there is no definition for this term. Candidates of
suited promoters 'from the recombinatorial repair promoters consist of the group
RecF, RecJ, RecN, RecO, RecQ, ruv and uvrD promoters'
- Induction ratio - Miller units (lexA71) / Miller units
(lexA+), as stated in the provided reference in the specifications
(Schnarr et al., Biochimie 1991, 73:423-431, which cites Peterson and
Mount, J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 193:27-40). lexA71 is a mutation that
results in the protein being deficient in DNA binding.
- Reporter - there is no definition for this term. The description states that
'such sequences are known in the state of the art', and gives a suitable
reporter gene as being the luciferase A and B genes, more preferably further
comprising luciferase C, D, and E genes, the sequences of which the description
refers to that of WO 1992/15687 (see chapter 5 - Patent applications filed and
patents owned by VITO).
Comments:
Although the description states that the SOS regulated promoter in the
subject invention is 'directed at a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising
an SOS regulated promoter with an induction ratio higher than 40', independent
claim 20 does not state the limitaion of the SOS regulated promoter as such (in
contrast to claims 1 and 21, see above), therefore may encompass any SOS
regulated promoter.
|
VITO
BOERETANG 200 B-2400 MOL BELGIUM
Ph + 32 14 33 55 11 Fax + 32 14 33 55 99
vito@vito.be
|
|
CA 2252699
- Earliest priority - 25 Apr 1996
- Filed - 25 Apr 1996
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Recombinant nucleic acid sequences and methods for
determining both genotoxicity and mutagenicity of a sample and the kinetics of
the genetoxicity
Claim 1
A recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with
an induction ratio higher than 40, said promoter being operatively linked to a
reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a
signal that can be assayed as light production.
|
Claim 20
A method for determining the presence of multiple genotoxic compounds in a
sample, said method comprising the steps of
- culturing a host microorganism, said host microorganism comprising a
nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter, said promoter being
operatively linked to a reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a
reporter resulting in a signal that can be assayed as light production, -
measuring the luminescence of the culture, said measuring occurring at
various points in time, preferably continuously and determining the signal to
noise ratio at said points in time, plotting the data, said data representing
the kinetics of genotoxicity of said sample with multiple peaks being indicative
of multiple genotoxicity compounds with different induction kinetics.
|
Claim 21
A method for determining the presence of a genotoxic compound in a sample,
said method comprising the steps of
- culturing a host microorganism, said host microorganism comprising a
nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with an induction
ratio higher than 20, said promoter being operatively linked to a reporter
encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a signal that
can be assayed as light production, - measuring the luminescence of the
culture at multiple points in time, preferably continuously and -
determining whether the luminescence of the culture has changed, increased
luminescence being indicative of the presence of a genotoxic compound.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter
operably linked to a reporter (claim 1)
- a method for determining the presence of multiple genotoxic compounds in a
sample (claim 20)
- a method for determining the presence of a genotoxic compound in a sample
(claim 21)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in AU 724155 (see
above).
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
|
US
6521751
- Earliest priority - 25 Apr 1996
- Filed - 25 Apr 1996
- Granted - 18 Feb 2003
- Expected expiry - 25 Apr 2016
|
Title - Recombinant nucleic acid sequences and methods for
determining both genotoxicity and mutagenicity of a sample and the kinetics of
the genetoxicity
Claim 1
A recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with
an induction ratio higher than 40, said promoter being operatively linked to a
reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a
signal that can be assayed as light production, wherein the promoter is Rec N
(seq. id. no. 3).
|
Claim 2
A recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with
an induction ratio higher than 40, said promoter being operatively linked to a
reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a
signal that can be assayed as light production, wherein the promoter is a
mutated RecN promoter with the following nucleic acid sequence id. no. 9.
|
Claim 3
A recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with
an induction ratio higher than 40, said promoter being operatively linked to a
reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a
signal that can be assayed as light production, wherein the promoter is a
mutated RecN promoter with the following nucleic acid sequence id. no. 10.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising RecN operably linked to a
reporter (claim 1, 2, 3)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in AU 724155 (see
above). The SOS regulated promoter is limited to those described as SEQ ID
NOs:3, 9 and 10.
- SEQ ID NO: 3 - wildtype recN promoter DNA sequence
- SEQ ID NO: 9 - recN promoter DNA sequence lacking the LexA2 site (recN1-3)
- SEQ ID NO: 10 - recN promoter DNA sequence with promoter up mutation
(recN2-4)
- Promoter up mutation - the mutation is such that the promoter sequence more
closely resembles that of the consensus sequence for the RNA polymerase binding
site.
Comments:
US 6521751 has the narrowest set of independent claims among its patent
family, as the nucleic acid sequence of the SOS regulated promoter is limited to
three sequences (SEQ ID NOs: 3, 9, and 10) coding for a wildtype (SEQ ID NO:3)
and mutated (SEQ ID NOs:9 and 10) RecN.
|
|
WO
1997/41251
- Earliest priority - 25 Apr 1996
- Filed - 25 Apr 1996
- Published - 6 Nov 1997
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Recombinant nucleic acid sequences and methods for
determining both genotoxicity and mutagenicity of a sample and the kinetics of
the genetoxicity
Claim 1
A recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with
an induction ratio higher than 40, said promoter being operatively linked to a
reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a
signal that can be assayed as light production.
|
Claim 20
A method for determining the presence of multiple genotoxic compounds in a
sample, said method comprising the steps of
- culturing a host microorganism, said host microorganism comprising a
nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter, said promoter being
operatively linked to a reporter encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a
reporter resulting in a signal that can be assayed as light production, -
measuring the luminescence of the culture, said measuring occurring at various
points in time, preferably continuously and determining the signal to noise
ratio at said points in time, plotting the data, said data representing the
kinetics of genotoxicity of said sample with multiple peaks being indicative of
multiple genotoxicity compounds with different induction kinetics.
|
Claim 21
A method for determining the presence of a genotoxic compound in a sample,
said method comprising the steps of
- culturing a host microorganism, said host microorganism comprising a
nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter with an induction
ratio higher than 20, said promoter being operatively linked to a reporter
encoding nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter resulting in a signal that
can be assayed as light production, - measuring the luminescence of the
culture at multiple points in time, preferably continuously and -
determining whether the luminescence of the culture has changed, increased
luminescence being indicative of the presence of a genotoxic compound.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising an SOS regulated promoter
operably linked to a reporter (claim 1)
- a method for determining the presence of multiple genotoxic compounds in a
sample (claim 20)
- a method for determining the presence of a genotoxic compound in a sample
(claim 21)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in AU 724155 (see
above).
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
|
Remarks
|
- National phase entry of WO 1997/41251 in Japan (JP 2001/507922) was rejected
on 4 Apr 2006. No further correspondence has been reported as of 18 may 2006.
- National phase entry of WO 1997/41251 in Europe (EP 907748) has deemed to be
withdrawn on 24 Aug 2005.
- Other national phase entry of WO 1997/41251 include Brazil (BR 9612617).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
17/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
VITO in applicant
|
|
Results
|
3
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 3 results identified using these search terms, 3 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patents owned by Toyota Central R&D Labs.
Inc.
Technology overview
Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc. is a laboratory owned by companies in the
Toyota Motors Group. Main R&D activities are centered towards motor vehicle
development, and is divided into five main sectors; energy and environment,
safety and human engineering, mechanical engineering, system engineering and
electronics, and materials. The related patents described in this section
discloses a recombinant gene comprising an SOS gene and a luciferase gene, and a
method to detect mutagenic substances using microorganisms transformed with the
recombinant gene. Examples in the specification of this patent family explain
production of a umuC-luc gene fusion using plasmid pSK1002 (containing
umuD,C-lacZ; Shinagawa et al.,
Gene
23:167-74 (1983) and the luc gene of the firefly Photinus
pyralis (on Pica Gene™ Cassette vector; Toyo Ink MFG. Co. Ltd, Japan),
which was introduced into S. typhimurium TA1535 and E. coli
CH26.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
EP
649905
- Earliest priority - 22 Oct 1993
- Filed - 21 Oct 1994
- Granted - 23 Sept 1998
- Expected expiry - 21 Oct 2014
|
Title - Methods of detection of mutagens using luminescence
gene
Claim 1
A recombinant gene comprising
- an SOS gene expressed when a DNA is damaged and a
gene expressing luciferase activity positioned downstream of
the SOS gene.
|
Claim 4
A host microorganism transformed with a
recombinant gene comprising
- an SOS gene expressed when a DNA is damaged and a gene expressing luciferase
activity positioned downstream of the SOS gene.
|
Claim 10
A method for detecting or quantitating a mutagenic substance in a sample,
comprising the steps of:
- culturing a host microorganism transformed with a recombinant gene
comprising an SOS gene expressed when a DNA is damaged and a gene expressing
luciferase activity positioned downstream of the SOS gene, in a medium to which
the sample is added; and
- measuring a luminescence generated by expression of the gene expressing
luciferase activity.
|
Claim 16
A recombinant gene comprising
- an SOS gene expressed when a DNA is damaged and genes expressing luciferase
activity and an enzyme which catalyzes the production of a
substrate for the luciferase, positioned downstream of
the SOS gene.
|
Claim 21
A host microorganism transformed with a recombinant gene comprising
- an SOS gene expressed when a DNA is damaged and genes expressing luciferase
activity and an enzyme which catalyzes the production of a substrate for the
luciferase positioned downstream of the SOS gene.
|
Claim 26
A method for detecting or quantitating a mutagenic substance in a sample,
comprising the steps of:
- culturing a host microorganism transformed with a recombinant gene
comprising an SOS gene expressed when a DNA is damaged and genes expressing
luciferase activity and an enzyme which catalyzes the production of a substrate
for luciferase, positioned downstream of the SOS gene, in a medium to which the
sample is added; and
-
measuring a luminescence generated by expression of the
genes expressing luciferase activity and an enzyme which catalyzes the
production of a substrate for luciferase.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a recombinant gene comprising an SOS gene and a gene expressing luciferase
(claim 1)
- a host microorganism transformed with a recombinant gene comprising an SOS
gene and a gene expressing luciferase (claim 4)
- a method for detecting or quantitating a mutagenic substance in a sample
(claim 10, 26)
- a recombinant gene comprising an SOS gene, a gene expressing luciferase and
an enzyme which catalyzes the production of a substrate for the luciferase
(claim 16)
- a host microorganism transformed with a recombinant gene comprising an SOS
gene, a gene expressing luciferase and an enzyme which catalyzes the production
of a substrate for the luciferase (claim 21)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- SOS gene - may be any SOS gene which is expressed when a DNA is damaged and
which contains so called SOS box
- Gene encoding luciferase - there is no definition for this term. The
description states that 'various genes can be used'
- Luciferase substrate - a long chain aldehyde or the like
- Host microorganism - any microorganism which allows SOS gene being expressed
when a DNA is damaged by a genotoxic substance such as a mutagenetic substance,
in other word, host microorganism may be those having the components of SOS
response
- Enzyme catalyzing the production of a substrate for the luciferase -
AND(P)H:FMN reductase, fatty acid reductases, or the like
- Transformed - conventional procedures used for transformation of
microorganisms such as bacteria may be used
- Measuring (in claim 10) - cultured microbial cells are collected, and the
cell wall is disrupted to release an expression product
- Measuring (in claim 26) - the cultured medium per se generates the
luminescence if the sample contained a genotoxic substance such as a mutagenic
substance. Therefore, immediately after the culturing the luminescence can be
measured
Comments:
Independent claim 1 of EP 649905 is relatively broad in two aspects:
- It is a 'product claim', therefore there is no limit on utility.
- There is no restriction on the type of SOS gene nor the gene expressing
luciferase activity (in contrast to claim 1 of US 5702883, see below).
The technology was enabled by transforming E. coli (strain CSH26)
and S. typhimurium (strain TA1535) wtih a umuC-luc fusion
protein-producing luminescence vector, which was subsequently tested for
luminescence against 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (AF-2),
4-nitroquinoline 4-oxide (4NQO), 1-nitropyrene (1-NP), 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA)
and benzo[a]pyrene (Bap). Construction of a vector containing both lux
and gene coding for the enzyme that catalyzes the substrate for luciferase was
built from pUCD620 (Kado et al., Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,
1987, 5, 225), the SOS gene umuD,C added, and introduced into S.
typhimurium TA1535.
Designated contracting States at the time of grant are: Switzerland, Germany,
France, United Kingdom, Liechtenstein
|
Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc.
41-1, AZA YOKOMICHI, OAZA NAGAKUTE NAGAKUTE-CHO, AICHI-GUN, AICHI, JAPAN
Note: all enquiries are through a standard mailing form provided on their
website:
http://www.tytlabs.co.jp/eindex.html
|
|
US
5702883
- Earliest priority - 22 Oct 1993
- Filed - 21 Oct 1994
- Granted - 30 Dec 1997
- Patent expired - 1 Feb 2006
|
Title - Methods of detection of mutagens using luminescence
gene
Claim 1
A method for identifying a mutagenic substance, comprising the steps of:
- culturing Escherichia or Salmonella transformed with
recombinant DNA comprising
(i) an Escherichia or Salmonella SOS gene
and (ii) a gene encoding luciferase isolated from
Photobacterium phosphoreum, Photobacterium leiognethi,
Vibrio splendidus, Vibrio cholerae, Photinus
pyralis, Vibrio harveyi or Vibrio fischeria; wherein
said gene encoding luciferase is positioned downstream of said SOS gene
such that when said SOS gene is expressed, then said gene encoding luciferase is
also expressed;
- contacting said culture with a substance to be tested wherein said
Escherichia or Salmonella in said culture is provided with a
luciferase substrate; and
- determining whether said substance is mutagenic by measuring the amount of
luminescence in said culture.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for identifying a mutagenic substance, comprising culturing
Escherichia or Salmonella transformed with recombinant DNA
comprising an SOS gene and a gene encoding luciferase (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- SOS gene - may be any SOS gene which is expressed when a DNA is damaged and
which contains so called SOS box
- Gene encoding luciferase - there is no definition for this term. The
description states that 'various genes can be used'
- luciferase substrate - a long chain aldehyde or the like
Comments:
US 5702883 expired due to non-payment of maintenance fees.
|
|
Remarks
|
Two related patents were granted in Japan:
- JP 3277426 - Transgenic Salmonella containing a SOS gene, gene expressing
luciferase activity and luciferase substrate gene (expected expiry 15 Feb 2014);
- JP 3277436 - Transgenic Salmonella containing a SOS gene and gene expressing
luciferase activity (expected expiry 26 Sept 2014).
|
Search strategy
This patent was identified as reference to WO 1997/41251 titled
'Recombinant nucleic acid sequences and methods for determining both
genotoxicity and mutagenicity of a sample and the kinetics of the genetoxicity'
filed by VITO.
Patent application filed by the University of
Tennessee Research Foundation
Technology overview
The US patent application described in this section is the most recent of a
series of patent documents filed by a research team lead by Dr John Sanseverino
and Dr Gary S. Sayler at the Center for Environmental Biotechnology at the
University of Tennessee, Knoxville. They have been studying the application of
transgenic microorganisms that can detect and report the presence of particular
environmental contaminants. This particular application concerns a transgenic
yeast cell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) contaning Photorhabdus
luminescens luxCDABE and a human chromosomal estrogen response element that
detect estrogenic agents. The related scientific publication of this technology
is Sanseverino J et al. (2005). Use of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae BLYES expressing bacterial bioluminescence for rapid, sensitive
detection of estrogenic compounds.
Appl
Environ Microbiol. 71(8):4455-4460.
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2006/8837
- Earliest priority - 4 Apr 2002
- Filed - 1 Aug 2005
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Compositions and methods for detecting estrogenic
agents in a sample
Claim 22
A yeast cell comprising:
(a) a nucleic acid encoding LuxA and a nucleic acid encoding LuxB,
the nucleic acid encoding LuxA and the nucleic acid encoding
LuxB both being operatively linked to at least a first
promoter and at least one estrogen response element; and
(b) at least one receptor capable of binding an estrogenic agent and the at
least one estrogen response element.
|
Claim 32
A method for detecting the presence of an estrogenic agent in a sample, the
method comprising:
(a) providing a sample; (b) providing at least one yeast cell comprising
a nucleic acid encoding
LuxA and a nucleic acid encoding
LuxB, the nucleic acid encoding LuxA and the nucleic acid
encoding LuxB both being operatively linked to at least a first
promoter and at least one estrogen response element, and at least one receptor
capable of binding an estrogenic agent and the at least one estrogen response
element; (c) contacting the at least one cell with the sample, wherein the
cell emits bioluminescence when the estrogenic agent is present; and (d)
analyzing the cell for bioluminescence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a yeast cell comprising LuxA and LuxB operably linked to a
promoter and an estrogen response element (claim 22)
- a method for detecting the presence of an estrogenic agent in a sample
(claim 32)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Operably linked - with a second nucleic-acid sequence when the first
nucleic-acid sequence is placed in a functional relationship with the second
nucleic-acid sequence.
- Promoter - any of a number of promoters suitable for use in the selected
host cell may be employed.
Comments:
Claims 1-22 have been cancelled.
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
University of Tennessee Research Foundation
1534 WHITE AVENUE SUITE 403 KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37996 Ph:
+1-865-974-1882
Email: vhunley@tennessee.edu
|
|
Remarks
|
This US application has a continuation-in-part (US 2004/2148), which is still
pending. Independent claim 1 of US 2004/2148 recites a eukaryotic cell
comprising luxA, luxB, luxC, luxD and
luxE, which is broad in scope if it is granted as applied.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
02/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biosensor AND (Sayler in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
27
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 27 results identified using these search terms, 4 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed and patents owned by the University of Tennessee
Research Corporation
Technology overview
This patent family is one of the three filings introduced in this technology
landscape, filed by a team lead by Dr John Sanseverino and Dr Gary S. Sayler at
the Center for Environmental Biotechnology at the University of Tennessee,
Knoxville. The technology disclosed in this patent family concerns an apparatus
that detects the presence of estrogenic compounds. It contains a transgenic
organism ('a collection of eukaryotic cells') that emits light upon exposure to
an estrogenic compound, and an integrated circuit chip that detects the light.
[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2006/014228
- Earliest priority - 25 November 1997
- Filed - 14 June 2005
- Granted as US 7090992 (see below)
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent bioreporter integrated circuit devices and methods for
detecting estrogen
|
Claim 1
An apparatus for the detection of an estrogen or a xenoestrogen, comprising:
- an integrated circuit chip, wherein
said chip comprises an integrated light detection system, and
- a biosensor comprising a collection of eukaryotic cells harboring a
recombinant lux gene from a high temperature microorganism wherein
said gene is operably linked with a heterologous promoter, wherein
a detectable light-emitting lux gene product is expressed in the
presence of said estrogen or xenoestrogen, light from said light-emitting
lux gene product being detected by said light detection system.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- An apparatus for the detection of an estrogen or a xenoestrogen, comprising
an integrated circuit chip and a biosensor (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 7090992 (see
below).
Comments:
Since US 20060104228 is a published application and not a granted patent,
there are no enforceable rights.
This application has been granted as US 7090992, with all 11 claims granted
as was applied for (see below for details).
|
University of Tennessee Research Foundation
1534 WHITE AVENUE
SUITE 403
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37996
Ph: +1-865-974-1882
Email: vhunley@tennessee.edu
|
|
US
7090992
- Earliest priority - 25 November 1997
- Filed - 14 June 2005
- Granted - 15 August 2006
- Expected expiry - 25 November 2017
|
Title - Bioluminescent bioreporter integrated circuit devices and methods for
detecting estrogen
|
Claim 1
An apparatus for the detection of an estrogen or a xenoestrogen, comprising:
- an integrated circuit chip, wherein
said chip comprises an integrated light detection system, and
- a biosensor comprising a collection of eukaryotic
cells harboring a recombinant lux gene from a high
temperature microorganism
wherein said gene is operably linked with a heterologous
promoter, wherein
a detectable light-emitting lux gene product is expressed in the
presence of said estrogen or xenoestrogen, light from said
light-emitting lux gene product being detected by said light detection
system.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- An apparatus for the detection of an estrogen or a xenoestrogen, comprising
an integrated circuit chip and a biosensor (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Biosensor - a small, portable, analytical device based on the combination of
recognition biomolecules with an appropriate transducer, and which detects
chemical or biological materials selectively and with high sensitivity.
- Eukaryotic cells - yeast cells are particularly preferred (but not limited
to).
- High temperature microorganism - there is no limitation on the type of
microorganism stated in the specification. Dependent claims 2 and 3 recite it to
be 'a bioluminescent microorganism' and 'Xenorhabdus luminescens,
Pseudomonas phosphoreum, or Photobacterium phosphoreum', respectively.
- heterologous promoter - is intended to refer to a promoter that is not
normally associated with a DNA segment encoding a crystal protein or peptide in
its natural environment.
- Promoter - may be constitutive, or inducible, and can be used under the
appropriate conditions to direct high level expression of the introduced DNA
segment.
- Estrogen or xenoestrogen - the type of estrogen or xenoestrogen that is to
be detected is not specified in the description. Dependent claim 4 recites
'estrone, estradiol, estriol or an esterified estrogen'.
Comments:
Claims in granted patent US 7090992 is relatively narrow in scope compared to
other bioindicator systems, in that protection is limited to
- that detects estrogen or xenoestrogen
- that consists at least of
- a eukaryotic biosensor with a lux gene from a high temperature microorganism
and
- an integrated circuit chip that detects luminescence.
|
|
Remarks
|
Related patent families of WO 9927351 (Bioluminescent bioreporter integrated
circuit) and WO 200223168 (Bioluminescent bioreporter integrated circuit
detection methods) contain claims that are generally drawn towards an apparatus
that does not necessarily contain a transgenic bioreporter, therefore was not
included in the analysis.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
14/09/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biosensor AND (Sayler in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
27
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 27 results identified using these search terms, 4 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent application filed and patent owned by
Kaneka Corporation and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and
Technology
Technology overview
Kaneka Corporation (chemical R&D company in the field of plastics,
pharmaceuticals and synthetic fibers, headquarters in Osaka, Japan) and the
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (NIAIST,
research organization spun off from Ministry of International Trade and Industry
in April 2001, fields of research include life sciences, IT, environment and
energy, nanotechnology, geoscience and metrology) jointly conducted research on
developing a bioassay system to detect hazardous chemical substances or natural
toxic substances in the environment. It involved production of transgenic
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells containing the mouse heat shock protein
(HSP47) promoter and specificity protein 1 (SP1) factor binding DNA sequence
linked to ß-galactosidase and SV40pA (polyadenylation signal for enhanced
reporter expression in mammalian cells), the technology of which was filed as
patent applications in the US and Japan. According to the Japanese patent
application JP 2003/079365, this research was published in the Abstracts of the
JSWE Annual Meeting published by the Japan Society on Water Environment on 14
Mar 2001.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2003/049737
- Earliest priority - 7 Sept 2001
- Filed - 11 Mar 2002
- Granted as US 6740521 (see below)
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - High-sensitive detection of environmental pollutants
Claim 1
A cell which is obtained by transfer of
- a promoter containing a heat shock factor binding DNA sequence and
- a transcriptional regulatory sequence necessary on an occasion of stress
induction as a transcriptional regulatory factor binding site, as well as
- a reporter gene under the control of said promoter into a chromosome,
said reporter gene - being connected, on the downstream side thereof, to
the SV40pA signal without any intervening intron, and - which is used for
detecting chemicals or natural toxins which disrupt or disturb homeostasis in
organisms, by measuring said reporter gene protein inducing activity.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a cell obtained by transfer of a promoter, a transcriptional regulatory
sequence, and a reporter gene with SV40pA (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 6740521.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
Kaneka Corporation
KITA-KU, OSAKA-SHI 2-4 NAKANOSHIMA 3-CHOME OSAKA 530-8288,
JAPAN Ph +81-6-6226-5050 Fax +81-6-6226-5037
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and
Technology
KITA-KU, OSAKA-SHI 3-1 KASUMIGASEKI 1-CHOME CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO
100-0013, JAPAN Ph +81-3-5501-0900
|
|
US
6740521
- Earliest priority - 7 Sept 2001
- Filed - 11 Mar 2002
- Granted - 25 May 2004
- Expected expiry - 11 Mar 2022
|
Title - High-sensitive detection of environmental pollutants
Claim 1
A cell which is obtained by transfer of
- a promoter containing a heat shock factor binding DNA sequence and
- a transcriptional regulatory sequence which functions in response to stress
induction of a protein as a transcriptional regulatory factor binding site, as
well as
- a reporter gene under the control of said promoter into a chromosome,
said reporter gene
- being connected, on the downstream side thereof, to the SV40pA signal
without any intervening intron, and - which is usable for detecting
chemicals or natural toxins which disrupt or disturb
homeostasis in organisms, by measuring a protein inducing activity of said
reporter gene, wherein
- the promoter containing the heat shock factor binding DNA sequence and the
transcriptional regulatory sequence which functions on the occasion of stress
induction of a protein as the transcriptional regulatory factor binding site, is
an HSP47 promoter containing the heat shock factor binding DNA sequence and an
SP1 factor binding sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a cell obtained by transfer of the HSP47 promoter containing the heat shock
factor binding DNA sequence, an SP1 factor binding sequence, and a reporter gene
with SV40pA (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- A cell - refers to as a stable transformant as distinguished from a cell in
a transient expression system.
- Transcriptional regulatory sequence (necessary on an occasion of stress
induction) - which functions on the occasion of stress induction of a protein
but not transcriptional regulatory sequence which functions independently of
stress induction (specifically the AP-1 binding DNA sequence or the NF-B binding
DNA sequence).
- Natural toxins - Preferably... a toxin produced by blue-green algae.
Comments:
The promoter sequence and transcriptional regulatory sequence in the granted
US 6740521 have been limited to HSP47 and SP1 factor binding sequence,
respectively.
|
|
Remark
|
Related application in Japan (JP 2003/079365) is pending.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
09/06/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming off
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search term
|
((inducible near/10 stress) or (induced near/10 stress)) and ((promoter in
title) or (promoter in abstract)) and plant and phosphorus
|
|
Results
|
25
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 25 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed by Lee KH and Kim SJ
Technology Overview
A Korean research team lead by Dr Sang-Jong Kim at the College of Natural
Sciences, Seoul National University, isolated a freshwater bacterium that was
sensitive to phenol (Janthinobacterium lividum YH9), transformed it
with a luciferase gene (luxAB) and deposited under KCTC 0730BP. In
contrast to the many other bioreporter systems, bioluminescence is constitutive
in the transgenic J. lividum, and exposure of the strain to toxic
substances will result in a decrease in the level of luminescence. The research
team subsequently produced an automated toxicity test system with the transgenic
J. lividum, which includes software to analyse real-time
bioluminescence (BactoTox®) described in Cho et al.
(2004). A novel continuous toxicity test system using a luminously modified
freshwater bacterium.
Biosens
Bioelectron. 20(2):338-44.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication No.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2001/034039
- Earliest priority - 3 Mar 2000
- Filed - 23 Feb 2001
- Application abandoned - 27 Oct 2003
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent organism for detecting toxic
substances
Claim 1
YH9-RC deposited under KCTC 0730BP reacts with
toxic substances to show change in the degree of luminescence.
|
Claim 2
A method for detecting toxic substances comprising
the step of determining the existence and the concentration of toxic
substances using a microorganism, wherein
- the microorganism is YH9-RC deposited under KCTC 0730BP, and
- an aldehyde is added as a substrate so that the microorganism can emit
light.
|
Claim 5
A kit for analyzing toxic substances comprising
- a toxic substance sample,
- a microorganism which reacts with the toxic substance to show change in the
degree of luminescence,
- a reactor where the sample reacts with the microorganism, and
- a light-detection apparatus which can detect light emitted from the
microorganism, wherein
the microorganism is YH9-RC deposited under KCTC 0730BP, and an aldehyde is
introduced into the reactor so that the microorganism can emit light.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- YH9-RC (transgenic Janthinobacterium lividum strain containing
luxAB) deposited under KCTC 0730BP (claim 1)
- a method for detecting toxic substances using YH9-RC (claim 2)
- a kit for analyzing toxic substances comprising YH9-RC (claim 5)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- YH9-RC - Rifampicin resistant J. lividum containing plasmid
pUTluxAB (Herrero et al. (1990). Transposon vectors containing
non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal
insertion of foreign genes in Gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol.
172:6557-6567)
- Toxic substances - there is no definition for this term. The inventors
suggest 'a variety of toxic substances' can be detected with this method, 'and
particularly they show excellent sensitivity to organic compounds such as
phenol, benzene, toluene, xylene, etc., and heavy metals such as Al, As, Cd, Co,
Cr(VI), Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Pb, Se, Zn, etc.'
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
Lee KH
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE MAJOR HANKUK UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES WANGSAN-RI,
MOHYEON YONGIN-CITY, KYUNGKIO-DO, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Kim SJ
MOKDONG APT. 907-1304 SHINJEONG 1-DONG, YANGCHEON-KU SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF
KOREA
|
EP 1148141
- Earliest priority - 3 Mar 2000
- Filed - 24 Feb 2001
- Application deemed to be withdrawn - 9 Mar 2005
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent organism for detecting toxic
substances
Claim 1
YH9-RC deposited under KCTC 0730BP reacts with toxic substances to show
change in the degree of luminescence.
|
Claim 2
A method for detecting toxic substances comprising
the step of determining the existence and the concentration of toxic
substances using a microorganism, wherein
- the microorganism is YH9-RC deposited under KCTC 0730BP, and
- an aldehyde is added as a substrate so that the microorganism can emit
light.
|
Claim 5
A kit for analyzing toxic substances comprising
- a toxic substance sample,
- a microorganism which reacts with the toxic substance to show change in the
degree of luminescence,
- a reactor where the sample reacts with the microorganism, and
- a light-detection apparatus which can detect light emitted from the
microorganism, wherein
the microorganism is YH9-RC deposited under KCTC 0730BP, and an aldehyde is
introduced into the reactor so that the microorganism can emit light.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- YH9-RC (Janthinobacterium lividum strain) deposited under KCTC
0730BP (claim 1)
- a method for detecting toxic substances using YH9-RC (claim 2)
- a kit for analyzing toxic substances comprising YH9-RC (claim 5)
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
|
Remarks
|
- Related patent granted in Japan (JP 3481212, currently in force, maintenance
fee paid to 10 Oct 2006).
- Other related patent documents in Kuwait (KR 2001086843).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
28/04/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
Janthinobacterium AND (Kim in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
1
|
|
Comments
|
|
Patent owned by the University of British
Columbia
Technology overview
A team lead by Dr Edward P. Candido at the Department of Biochemistry,
University of British Columbia conducted research on stress response using
Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism. Major research interests
of Dr Candido's laboratory include the ubiquitin-conjugation system and heat
shock protein (hsp) biology, one study of which concerned the creation of
transgenic C. elegans having the promoter of hsp fused to the lacZ
gene of E. coli that was evaluated for the potential to be used as
a biosensor to detect environmental pollutants. The following three related
scientific articles were published by the research team:
- Stringham et al. (1992). Temporal and spatial expression patterns
of the small heat shock (hsp16) genes in transgenic Caenorhabditis
elegans.
Mol
Biol Cell. 3(2):221-33.
- Stringham and Candido (1993). Transgenic strains of the nematode
Caenorhabditis elegans as biological monitors of environmental stress.
FASEB J. 7(7): A1222-A1222.
- Stringham and Candido (1994). Transgenic hsp16-lacZ strains of the
soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as biological monitors of
environmental stress. Environ Toxicol Chem. 13(8): 1211-1220.
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
5877398
- Earliest priority - 29 Jan 1993
- Filed - 7 Apr 1995
- Granted - 2 Mar 1999
- Patent expired - 2 Apr 2003
|
Title - Biological systems incorporating stress-inducible
genes and reporter constructs for environmental biomonitoring and toxicology
Claim 1
A transgenic nematode
- selected from the group consisting of PC71, deposited as ATCC Accession
Designation No. 209318, PC72, deposited as ATCC Accession Designation No.
209319, and PC73, deposited as ATCC Accession Designation No. 209320,
- said nematode having a gene construct stably integrated into its genome, and
gene construct comprising the nematode hsp16 promoter operably
linked to the lacZ gene, wherein the lacZ gene is expressed
when said nematode is exposed to a toxin.
|
Claim 5
A kit comprising:
(a) a test chamber containing a liquid growth medium and at least one
transgenic nematode selected from the group consisting of PC71, deposited as
ATCC Accession Designation No. 209318, PC72, deposited as ATCC Accession
Designation No. 209319, and PC73, deposited as ATCC Accession Designation No.
209320, said nematode having a gene construct stably integrated into its genome,
said gene construct comprising a nematode hsp16 promoter operably linked to the
lacZ gene, wherein the lacZ gene is expressed when said nematode is exposed to a
toxin; and
(b) means for detecting expression of the lacZ gene.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a transgenic nematode having the nematode hsp16 promoter operably linked to
the lacZ gene (claim 1)
- a kit comprising a test chamber containing at least one transgenic nematode
having the nematode hsp16 promoter operably linked to the lacZ gene (claim 5)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- Nematode - there is no definition for this term. All ATCC accessions are
transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans lines.
- hsp16 (heat shock protein 16) - of the nematode Caenorhabditis
elegans
- lacZ gene - of the E. coli gene... encodes the enzyme, β-galactosidase
- Toxin - there is no definition/limitation for this term. The examples report
β-galactosidase activity upon exposure of a transgenic nematode to
Pb(NO3)2, ZnCl2, NaAsO2,
HgCl2, CuCl2, CdCl2, and a herbicide 'paraquat'
(see Figure 5 in the specification). Note that heat (33 ˚C is the temperature
given in the example and in Figure 6) also induces β-galactosidase activity for
these transgenic nematodes.
- Means (for detecting lacZ gene expression) - this term is not defined. The
specification provides the following two methods of detection:
- qualitative histochemical assay - indicates which tissues have undergone the
stress response
- quantitative soluble assay - provides a colour change reflecting the level
of stress-induced enzyme in the whole animal
- PC71 and PC72 - C. elegans strains containing the complete
translational fusion of hsp16::lacZ
- PC73 - C. elegans strain containing the hsp16-48/1 translational
exon 1::lacZ fusion
Comments:
Granted US 5877398 has expired due to non-payment of maintenance fees.
Although not recited in the claims (and therefore are not enforceable), the
specification provides other possible reporter systems by potentially using a
bacterial or firefly luciferase gene as the reporter gene, and other promoters
that 'respond to different classes of stressors or conditions..., e.g.
metallothionein or cytochrome P450 promoters, or other heat shock promoters'.
|
University of British Columbia
University-Industry Liaison Office
The University of British Columbia #103 - 6190 Agronomy Road Vancouver,
BC Canada V6T 1Z3 Ph +1-604-822-8580
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
28 Apr 2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biomonitor and cadmium
|
|
Results
|
22
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 22 results identified using these search terms, 3 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed by Giorgio and
Valentina MANGIAROTTI
Technology overview
Dr Giorgio Mangiarotti conducted research on the molecular biology of
Dictyostelium discoideum at the Department of Clinical and Biological
Sciences, University of Turin at the time of filing. Their patent application
below discloses use of wildtype or genetically engineered Dictyostelium
cells to detect toxic substances in the environment. A preferred embodiment
disclosed in the specification is use of E. coli beta galactosidase as
the reporter gene in transgenic Dictyostelium.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
WO
1999/009202
- Earliest priority - 20 Aug 1997
- Filed - 8 Aug 1998
- Published - 25 Feb 1999
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Process to detect toxic substances in the
environment
Claim 1
Process to detect toxic substances in the environment based on the use of a
biosensor, characterized in that it includes the stages consisting in:
- placing in an environment to be biomonitorized, such as air, ground, food,
clothes, etc. a biosensor consisting of cells of a wild type strain or of
genetically engineered strains of
Dictyostelium in conditions apt to development;
- leaving for 20 hr the cells in such an environment;
-
evaluating the morphology of the developing cells
aggreagates or the expression of reporter genes.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a process to detect toxic substances in the environment consisting placing
cells of a wild type strain or of genetically engineered strains of
Dictyostelium in an environment to be biomonitored
Definitions extracted from the description are:
-
Dictyostelium - a lower fungus (a myxomycete) consisting of ameboid
cells which in nature feed on bacteria by phagocytosis
- Genetically engineered strains (of Dictyostelium) -
Dictyostelium cells in which a plasmid containing the gene of a
reporter protein has been inserted... the reporter gene is fused to regulatory
elements derived from different genes of Dictyostelium.
- Evaluating - there is no definition/limitation for this term. For use of
wildtype Dictyostelium cells 'the morphological changes of cell
aggregates will be followed', whereas use of genetically engineered
Dictyostelium cells 'the presence of the reporter protein in the
organism will be detected by nuke eye'.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
No examples of transgenic Dictyostelium strains are provided in the
specification, therefore enablement of this technology is unclear.
|
Giorgio MANGIAROTTI
Via Pollicino, 10 I-10052 Bardonecchia, Italy
Valentina MANGIAROTTI
Via Gibellini, 4 I-10020 Pecetto Torinese, Italy
|
| Remarks |
- National phase entries of WO 1999/009202 in Australia (AU 92592/98) and
Europe (EP 1005568) have lapsed/deemed to be withdrawn on 11 May 2000 and 5 Sept
2001, respectively.
- Other related patent documents listed in INPADOC include Italy (IT
97840751).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
28 Apr 2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biomonitor and cadmium
|
|
Results
|
22
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 22 results identified using these search terms, 3 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed by the National
University of Singapore
Technology overview
A research team lead by Dr Zhiyuan Gong at the Department of Biological
Sciences, National University of Singapore, identified several homologous gene
promoters for zebrafish (Danio rerio), linked them to a modified green
fluorescent protein (GFP) gene, and successfully created transgenic zebrafish
that express GFP (related publication by Ju et al. (1999). Faithful
expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in transgenic zebrafish embryos
under control of zebrafish gene promoters.
Dev
Genet. 25:158-167). They have filed patent applications concerning this
technology, indicating that hormone-inducible or heavy metal-inducible promoter
genes can be used to create bioreporter fish that can detect such contaminants
in water samples in the patent specification.
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2004/143864
- Earliest priority - 18 Feb 1999
- Filed - 21 Oct 2003
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Chimeric gene constructs for generation of
fluorescent transgenic ornamental fish
Claim 1
A method of providing transgenic fish to the ornamental
fish market, comprising the steps of:
(a) obtaining an ornamental transgenic fish comprising one
or more chimeric fluorescence genes positioned under the
control of a promoter, wherein
- the transgenic fish expresses one or more fluorescent proteins encoded by
the one or more fluorescence genes at a level sufficient such
that said fish fluoresces upon exposure to one or more of a blue light,
ultraviolet light or sunlight; and
(b) distributing said fish to the ornamental fish market.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of providing transgenic fish to the ornamental fish market (claim
1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Ornamental - there is no definition for this term. The Merriam-Webster
online dictionary has the following definition: (adj) of, relating to, or
serving as ornament; specifically : grown as an ornamental
- Fish - there is no definition for this term. Dependent claims 39 and 41
recite the following: zebrafish, medaka, goldfish or carp (claim 39), koi,
loach, tilapia, glassfish, catfish, angel fish, discus, eel, tetra, goby,
gourami, guppy, Xiphophorus, hatchet fish, Molly fish, or pangasius (claim 41).
- Chimeric fluorescence gene(s) - ... comprising a promoter described herein
operatively linked to a heterologous gene.
- Fluorescence gene(s) - there is no definition for this term. The Detailed
Description provides the following examples: DNA that codes for ... fluorescent
peptides including GFP, EGFP, BFP, EBFP, YFP, EYFP, CFP, ECFP and enzymes (such
as luciferase, β-galactosidase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, etc.).
- Promoter - constitutive (ubiquitous), or that have tissue specificity such
as skin specificity or muscle specificity or that are inducible by a chemical
substance...
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
According to USPTO Public PAIR, this application is a continuation of US
09/913898 (filed 3 Oct 2001), which is also still pending. There is no
publication concerning this application. INPADOC legal status of WO 2000/49150
(see below) indicates that this PCT application entered national phase in the US
on the same date of filing of US 09/913898, therefore it is likely that this
unpublished US patent application is the original national phase entry of WO
2000/49150 into the US.
Claims in this patent application are not directed towards a product or
method concerning a bioreporter system because independent claim 1 states that
the use of the transgenic fish is for the ornamental fish market. However, the
PCT application from which this national phase entry arose contains claims
reciting use of the transgenic fish for sensing purposes (see below), and
therefore was included in the analysis.
|
National University of Singapore
10 KENT RIDGE CRESCENT SINGAPORE 0511
Contact on university website:
National University of Singapore
21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119077
Ph +65-6516-6666
|
|
WO
2000/49150
- Earliest priority - 18 Feb 1999
- Filed - 16 Jul 1999
- Published - 24 Aug 2000
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Chimeric gene constructs for generation of
fluorescent transgenic ornamental fish
|
Claim 1
A zebrafish cytokeratin gene promoter which is capable of directing a
structural gene to be predominantly expressed in skin epithelia when it is
inserted in front of the structural gene and introduced into
fish embryos.
|
|
Claim 2
A zebrafish muscle creatine kinase gene promoter which is capable of
directing a structural gene to be specifically expressed in muscles when it is
inserted in front of the structural gene and introduced into fish embryos.
|
|
Claim 3
A zebrafish fast skeletal muscle isoform of myosin light chain 2 gene
promoter which is capable of directing a structural gene to be predominantly
expressed in skeletal muscles when it is inserted in front of the structural
gene and introduced into fish embryos.
|
|
Claim 4
A zebrafish acidic ribosomal protein PG gene promoter which is capable of
directing a structural gene to be expressed ubiquitously in all tissues when it
is inserted in front of the structural gene and introduced into fish embryos.
|
|
Claim 10
A transgenic fish comprising a DNA that encodes a fluorescent protein under
control of a promoter that causes said DNA (1) to be
expressed in predominantly skin epithelia, (2) to be specifically expressed
in muscles, (3) to be predominantly expressed in skeletal muscles, or
(4) to be expressed ubiquitously in all tissues.
|
|
Claim 14
A recombinant DNA vector comprising a promoter DNA that hybridizes under
stringent conditions to a polynucleotide of any one of
SEQ ID NOS:7, 8, 9, or 22, operatively linked to a structural
gene encoding a fluorescent or chemiluminescent protein.
|
|
Claim 16
A transgenic fish comprising a chimeric gene in turn comprising a promoter
DNA that hybridizes under stringent conditions to a polynucleotide of any one of
SEQ ID NOS:7, 8, 9, or 22, operatively linked to a structural gene encoding a
fluorescent or a chemiluminescent protein.
|
|
Claim 17
A method for sensing a steroid hormone or a steroid hormone derivative in a
water sample comprising: (a) contacting a fish expressing a fluorescent or
chemiluminescent protein under control of an estrogen- or other steroid
hormone-inducible promoter with a sample of water; and (b) measuring the
amount of fluorescent or chemiluminescent light from said fish.
|
|
Claim 18
A method for sensing heavy metals, such as zinc, copper, cadmium, mecury
etc., in a water sample comprising: (a) contacting a fish expressing a
fluorescent or chemiluminescent protein under control of a heavy metal-inducible
promoter with a sample of water; and (b) measuring the amount of
fluorescent or chemiluminescent light from said fish.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a zebrafish cytokeratin gene promoter (claim 1)
- a zebrafish muscle creatine kinase gene promoter (claim 2)
- a zebrafish fast skeletal muscle isoform of myosin light chain 2 gene
promoter (claim 3)
- a zebrafish acidic ribosomal protein PG gene promoter (claim 4)
- a transgenic fish comprising a DNA that encodes a fluorescent protein under
control of a promoter (claim 10)
- a recombinant DNA vector comprising a promoter DNA operatively linked to a
structural gene encoding a fluorescent or chemiluminescent protein (claim 14)
- a transgenic fish comprising a chimeric gene comprising a promoter DNA
operatively linked to a structural gene encoding a fluorescent or
chemiluminescent protein (claim 16)
- a method for sensing a steroid hormone or a steroid hormone derivative in a
water sample (claim 17)
- a method for sensing heavy metals, such as zinc, copper, cadmium, mecury
etc., in a water sample (claim 18)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Ornamental - there is no definition for this term. The Merriam-Webster
online dictionary has the following definition: (adj) of, relating to, or
serving as ornament; specifically : grown as an ornamental
- Fish - there is no definition for this term. Dependent claims 39 and 41
recite the following: zebrafish, medaka, goldfish or carp (claim 39), koi,
loach, tilapia, glassfish, catfish, angel fish, discus, eel, tetra, goby,
gourami, guppy, Xiphophorus, hatchet fish, Molly fish, or pangasius (claim 41).
- Chimeric fluorescence gene(s) - ... comprising a promoter described herein
operatively linked to a heterologous gene.
- Fluorescence gene(s) - there is no definition for this term. The Detailed
Description provides the following examples: DNA that codes for ... fluorescent
peptides including GFP, EGFP, BFP, EBFP, YFP, EYFP, CFP, ECFP and enzymes (such
as luciferase, β-galactosidase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, etc.).
- Promoter (unless specified otherwise) - constitutive (ubiquitous), or that
have tissue specificity such as skin specificity or muscle specificity or that
are inducible by a chemical substance...
- Structural gene - encode a protein that produces a fluorescent or
chemiluminescent light under conditions appropriate to the particular
polypeptide in one or more tissues of a fish.
- SEQ ID NO:7 - complete sequence of the cytokeratin (CK) promoter region
- SEQ ID NO:8 - complete sequence of the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter
region
- SEQ ID NO:9 - complete sequence of the acidic ribosomal protein P0 (ARP)
promoter region including the first intron
- SEQ ID NO:22 - complete sequence of the fast skeletal muscle isoform of
myosin light chain 2 (MLC2f) promoter region
- Stringent conditions - under salt and temperature conditions providing
stringency at least as high as that equivalent to 5×SSC and 42° C.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
Unlike the claims recited in the national phase entry of WO 2000/49150 in the
US (US 2004/143864, see above), the set of claims recited in this PCT
application are not only directed towards ornamental use of these transgenic
fish (and concerning promoters and structural genes), but also towards any other
method of use, including use in sensing particular substances such as hormones
and heavy metals. The first seven independent claims listed above (claims 1, 2,
3, 4, 10, 14, 16) are not limited to any method of use, therefore the scope of
these claims will be broad if they are granted as applied for.
Examples in the specification of WO 2000/49150 provide a chapter on
'potenatial applications of fluorescent transgenic fish', which contains a
proposal of use of the system to produce transgenic fish that can be used for
detection of environemntal pollution, but without actual experimental data to
enable the proposal (e.g. promoter/reporter constructs, transgenic fish,
response of such transgenic fish to substances).
|
| Remarks |
Related application filed in Singapore (SG 82624).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
02/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biosensor AND transgenic AND "water quality"
|
|
Results
|
12
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 12 results identified using these search terms, 2 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed and granted patents
owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 2
Technology overview
The patent family described in this section by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and
Co. disclose a method to detect the presence of environmental insults (defined
in the specification as 'substance or environmental change that results in an
alteration of normal cellular metabolism in a bacterial cell or population of
cells') by using a transgenic organism containing a lux gene complex
that is under control of a stress-inducible promoter that is responsive to a
regulatory circuit. Examples in the patent specification provide the following
constructs that were tested for luminescence upon exposure of transgenic E.
coli strains containing the constructs to various chemical (e.g. ethanol,
heavy metal compounds, hydrogen peroxide, mitomycin C) and physical (UV
radiation) stressors:
-
grpEp::lux
-
lonp::lux
-
recAp::lux
-
uvrAp::lux
-
katGp::lux
-
micFp::lux
-
uspAp::lux
-
xthAp::lux
-
hisp::lux
-
lacp::lux
-
phoAp::lux - Transgenic E. coli responded to limiting
phosphate in the medium
-
glnAp::lux - Transgenic E. coli responded to limiting
nitrogen in the medium
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
CA 2150232
- Earliest priority - 4 Dec 1992
- Filed - 2 Dec 1993
- Granted - 19 Dec 2000
- Expected expiry - 2 Dec 2013
|
Title - A highly sensitive method for detecting
environmental insults
Claim 1
A method of detecting the presence of an environmental insult comprising:
(a) exposing a transformed detector E. coli to an environmental
insult, the transformed detector E. coli being genetically engineered
to contain an expressible heterologous luxCDABE gene complex under the
control of a stress-inducible promoter sequence wherein the promoter sequence is
responsive to a regulatory circuit; and (b) measuring an increase in
luminescence of the transformed detector E. coli, the increase
indicating the presence of an environmental insult.
|
Claim 2
A method of detecting stress in a population of transformed E. coli
comprising:
(a) exposing a population of transformed detector E. coli to an
environmental insult, the transformed detector E. coli being
genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous luxCDABE
gene complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter sequence wherein
the promoter sequence is responsive to a global regulatory circuit; and
(b) measuring an increase in luminescence of the transformed detector E.
coli, the increase indicating stress.
|
Claim 8
A transformed bioluminescent E coli capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult, the
transformed bioluminescent E. coli comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence wherein the promoter sequence is
responsive to a regulatory circuit; and (b) an expressible heterologous
luxCDABE gone complex under the control of the stress inducible
promoter sequence.
|
Claim 10
A method of detecting the presence of a environmental insult comprising:
(a) exposing a transformed detector E. coli to a sublethal
environmental insult, the transformed detector E. coli being
genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous luxCDABE
gone complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter sequence wherein
the promoter sequence is responsive to a regulatory circuit; and (b)
measuring an increase in luminescence of the transformed detector E.
coli, the increase indicating the presence of an environmental insult.
|
Claim 11
E. coli selected from the group consisting of:
(i) TV1076 having ATCC Number 69314 comprising a tolC- mutation and an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under the control of a grpE
stress inducible promoter sequence; (ii) WM1302 having ATCC Number 69316
comprising a tolC- mutation and an expressible heterologous lux gene
complex under the control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence;
(iii) TV1060 having ATCC Number 69142 comprising an expressible heterologous
lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress inducible promoter
sequence; (iv) TV1061 having ATCC Number 69315 comprising an expressible
heterologous lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress inducible
promoter sequence; (v) WM1021 having ATCC Number 69141 comprising an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control of a dnaK
stress inducible promoter sequence; (vi) WM1026 having ATCC Number 69143
comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control
of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence; and (vii) WM1202 having ATCC
Number 69313 comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex
under control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence.
|
Claim 12
A nucleic acid molecule, comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence wherein said promoter sequence is
responsive to a regulatory circuit; and (b) an expressible bacterial
luxCDABE gene complex under control of said promoter sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting the presence of an environmental insult comprising
exposing E. coli engineered to contain an expressible heterologous
luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter
sequence (claim 1, 10)
- a method of detecting stress in a population of transformed E. coli
comprising exposing E. coli engineered to contain an expressible
heterologous luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a
stress-inducible promoter sequence (claim 2)
- a transformed bioluminescent E coli capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult
(claim 8)
-
E. coli strains comprising an expressible heterologous lux
gene complex under control of a stress inducible promoter sequence (claim 11)
- a nucleic acid molecule comprising a stress inducible promoter sequence and
an expressible bacterial luxCDABE gene complex (claim 12)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 5683868.
Comments:
The scope of the independent claims in granted CA 2150232 is the same as
those of US 5683868.
|
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.
1007 MARKET STREET WILMINGTON, DE 19898
Licensing information: Ph +1-(781) 972-0607 Email dupont@yet2.com
DuPont has a website called 'DuPont Technology Bank', which contains
information on licensing patented technology by their company:
http://dupont.t2h.yet2.com/t2h/page/homepage/
|
|
EP
673439 B1
EP
673439 B2
- Earliest priority - 4 Dec 1992
- Filed - 2 Dec 1993
- Granted - 23 Apr 1997
- Modified - 4 Jul 2001
- Expected expiry - 2 Dec 2013
|
Title - Method for detecting environmental insults
Claim 1
A method of detecting environmental stress comprising:
(a) exposing a detector organism to an environmental insult, said organism
being genetically engineered to contain an expressible lux gene complex
under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence wherein the
promoter sequence is responsive to a global regulatory circuit; and
(b) measuring a change in luminescence of said detector organism.
|
Claim 2
A method of detecting environmental stress comprising:
(a) exposing a detector organism to a sublethal environmental insult, said
organism being genetically engineered to contain an expressible lux
gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence
wherein the promoter sequence is responsive to a global regulatory
circuit; and (b) measuring an increase in luminescence of said
detector organism.
|
Claim 4
A method of detecting stress on a microorganism population, comprising:
(a) exposing a detector organism to an environmental insult, said organism
being genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous lux
gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence
wherein the promoter sequence is responsive to a global regulatory
circuit; and (b) measuring a change in luminescence of said
detector organism.
|
Claim 7
A transformed bioluminescent microorganism capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult, said
microorganism comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence wherein the promoter
sequence is responsive to a global regulatory circuit; and (b) an
expressible lux gene complex under the control of said stress inducible
promoter sequence.
|
Claim 10
E. coli selected from the group consisting of:
(i) TV1076 having ATCC Number 69314 comprising a tolC- mutation and an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under the control of a grpE
stress inducible promoter sequence; (ii) WM1302 having ATCC Number 69316
comprising a tolC- mutation and an expressible heterologous lux gene
complex under the control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence;
(iii) TV1060 having ATCC Number 69142 comprising an expressible heterologous
lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress inducible promoter
sequence; (iv) TV1061 having ATCC Number 69315 comprising an expressible
heterologous lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress inducible
promoter sequence; (v) WM1021 having ATCC Number 69141 comprising an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control of a dnaK
stress inducible promoter sequence; (vi) WM1026 having ATCC Number 69143
comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control
of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence; and (vii) WM1202 having ATCC
Number 69313 comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex
under control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence.
|
Claim 11
Nucleic acid molecules, comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence wherein the promoter
sequence is responsive to a global regulatory circuit; and (b) an
expressible bacterial lux gene complex under control of said promoter
sequence.
|
Note: amended phrases of the independent claims of EP 673439 B2 from EP
673439 B1 are indicated in bold.
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting environmental stress comprising exposing a detector
organism genetically engineered to contain an expressible lux gene
complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence (claim 1, 2)
- a method of detecting stress on a microorganism population comprising
exposing a detector organism genetically engineered to contain an expressible
lux gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter
sequence (claim 4)
- a transformed bioluminescent microorganism capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult
(claim 7)
-
E. coli strains comprising an expressible heterologous lux
gene complex under control of a stress inducible promoter sequence (claim 10)
- nucleic acid molecules comprising a stress inducible promoter sequence and
an expressible bacterial lux gene complex (claim 11)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 5683868.
Comments:
All six independent claims in EP 673439 are relatively broader in scope
compared to those of US 5683868 for the following two reasons:
- There is no limit on the type of detector organism.
- There is no limit on the type of lux genes included in the
lux gene complex of the transgenic detector organism (minimum
requirements of luxA and luxB are stated in the specification,
see definitions for 'lux' provided in US 5683868).
Designated contracting States at the time of grant (as of 4 Jul 2001) are:
Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, United Kingdom,
Greece, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands,
Portugal, Sweden
According to European Patent Register, VITO filed an opposition after the
initial decision to grant on 23 Jan 1998 based on lack of novelty and
insufficient disclosure (referred to their own PCT application WO 1992/15687 and
other scientific publication as prior art), after which the claims were amended
and the decision to maintain the patent in its amended form issued on 25 May
2001 (amended patent subsequently published on 4 Jul 2001).
|
|
US
5683868
- Earliest priority - 4 Dec 1992
- Filed - 2 Dec 1993 (check date)
- Granted - 4 Nov 1997
- Expected expiry - 4 Nov 2014
|
Title - Highly sensitive method for detecting environmental
insults
Claim 1
A method of detecting the presence of an environmental
insult comprising:
(a) exposing a transformed detector E. coli to an
environmental insult, the transformed detector E. coli being
genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous luxCDABE
gene complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter
sequence wherein the promoter sequence is responsive to a regulatory
circuit; and (b) measuring an increase in luminescence of the
transformed detector E. coli, the increase indicating the presence of
an environmental insult.
|
Claim 2
A method of detecting stress in a population of transformed
E. coli comprising:
(a) exposing a population of transformed detector E. coli to an
environmental insult, the transformed detector E. coli being
genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous luxCDABE
gene complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter sequence wherein
the promoter sequence is responsive to a global regulatory circuit; and
(b) measuring an increase in luminescence of the transformed detector E. coli,
the increase indicating stress.
|
Claim 8
A transformed bioluminescent E coli capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of
environmental insult, the transformed bioluminescent E. coli
comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence wherein the promoter sequence is
responsive to a regulatory circuit; and (b) an expressible heterologous
luxCDABE gene complex under the control the stress inducible promoter
sequence.
|
Claim 10
A method of detecting the presence of a environmental insult comprising:
(a) exposing a transformed detector E. coli to a sublethal
environmental insult, the transformed detector E. coli being
genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous luxCDABE
gene complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter sequence wherein
the promoter sequence is responsive to a regulatory circuit; and (b)
measuring an increase in luminescence of the transformed detector E.
coli, the increase indicating the presence of an environmental insult.
|
Claim 11
E. coli selected from the group consisting of:
(i) TV1076 having ATCC Number 69314 comprising a tolC- mutation and an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under the control of a grpE
stress inducible promoter sequence; (ii) WM1302 having ATCC Number 69316
comprising a tolC- mutation and an expressible heterologous lux gene
complex under the control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence;
(iii) TV1060 having ATCC Number 69142 comprising an expressible heterologous
lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress
inducible promoter sequence; (iv) TV1061 having ATCC Number 69315
comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control
of a grpE stress inducible promoter sequence; (v) WM1021 having ATCC Number
69141 comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex under
control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence; (vi) WM1026 having
ATCC Number 69143 comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene
complex under control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence; and
(vii) WM1202 having ATCC Number 69313 comprising an expressible heterologous
lux gene complex under control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter
sequence.
|
Claim 12
A nucleic acid molecule, comprising: (a) a stress inducible promoter
sequence wherein said promoter sequence is responsive to a regulatory circuit;
and (b) an expressible bacterial luxCDABE gene complex under
control of said promoter sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting the presence of an environmental insult comprising
exposing E. coli engineered to contain an expressible heterologous
luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a stress-inducible promoter
sequence (claim 1, 10)
- a method of detecting stress in a population of transformed E. coli
comprising exposing E. coli engineered to contain an expressible
heterologous luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a
stress-inducible promoter sequence (claim 2)
- a transformed bioluminescent E. coli capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult
(claim 8)
-
E. coli strains comprising an expressible heterologous lux
gene complex under control of a stress inducible promoter sequence (claim 11)
- a nucleic acid molecule comprising a stress inducible promoter sequence and
an expressible bacterial luxCDABE gene complex (claim 12)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Promoter - a sequence of DNA, usually upstream of (5' to) the protein coding
sequence of a structural gene, which controls the expression of the coding
region by providing the recognition for RNA polymerase and/or other factors
required for transcription to start at the correct site.
-
lux - the lux structural genes which include luxA, luxB, luxC, luxD
and luxE and which are responsible for the phenomenon of bacterial
bioluminescence. A lux gene complex might include all of the independent lux
genes, acting in concert, or any subset of the lux structural genes so long as
luxA and luxB are part of the complex.
- Stress - the condition produced in a cell as the result of exposure to an
environmental insult.
- Environmental insult - any substance or environmental change that results in
an alteration of normal cellular metabolism in a bacterial cell or population of
cells.
- Stress-inducible promoter - any promoter capable of activating a stress gene
and causing increased expression of the stress gene product.
- Detector organism (E. coli) - organism (E. coli) which
contains a gene fusion consisting of a stress inducible promoter fused to a
structural gene and which is capable of expressing the lux gene products in
response to an environmental insult.
- Regulatory circuit - there is no definition for this term. Table 1 in the
specification lists the following circuits with corresponding stimuli,
regulatory genes and responding genes: heat shock, SOS,
H2O2, superoxide, fatty acid starvation, universal stress,
resting state, stringent, catabolite activation, P utilization, and N
utilization.
- Subelethal level - levels below those needed to affect cell metabolism.
Comments:
Similar to the limitations added to the scope of the six independent claims
granted in CA 2150232, claims granted in US 5683868 have the following
limitations:
- The detector organism is limited to E. coli
- The lux gene complex must contain all five genes, luxA,
luxB, luxC, luxD and luxE.
According to the examples provided in the specification, tolC-
mutations of E. coli strains ATCC 69314 and ATCC 69316 in claim 11
confer inhanced permeability of organic compounds into the E. coli
cells.
|
|
WO
1994/13831
- Earliest priority - 4 Dec 1992
- Filed - 2 Dec 1993
- Published - 23 Jun 1994
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - A highly sensitive method for detecting
environmental insults
Claim 1
A method of detecting environmental stress comprising:
(a) exposing a detector organism to an environmental insult, said organism
being genetically engineered to contain an expressible lux gene complex
under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence; and (b)
measuring a change in luminescence of said detector organism.
|
Claim 2
A method of detecting environmental stress comprising:
(a) exposing a detector organism to a sublethal environmental insult, said
organism being genetically engineered to contain an expressible lux
gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence; and
(b) measuring an increase in luminescence of said detector organism.
|
Claim 4
A method of detecting stress on a microorganism population, comprising:
(a) exposing a detector organism to an environmental insult, said organism
being genetically engineered to contain an expressible heterologous lux
gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence; and
(b) measuring a change in luminescence of said detector organism.
|
Claim 7
A transformed bioluminescent microorganism capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult, said
microorganism comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence; and (b) an expressible
lux gene complex under the control of said stress inducible promoter
sequence.
|
Claim 10
E. coli selected from the group consisting of:
(i) TV1076 having ATCC Number 69314 comprising a tolC mutation and an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under the control of a grpE
stress inducible promoter sequence; (ii) WM1302 having ATCC Number 69316
comprising a tolC mutation and an expressible heterologous lux gene
complex under the control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence;
(iii) TV1O6O having ATCC Number 69142 comprising an expressible heterologous
lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress inducible promoter
sequence; (iv) TV1061 having ATCC Number 69315 comprising an expressible
heterologous lux gene complex under control of a grpE stress inducible
promoter sequence; (v) W141021 having ATCC Number 69141 comprising an
expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control of a dnaK
stress inducible promoter sequence; (vi) WM1026 having ATTC Number 69143
comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex under control
of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence; and (vii) Wb41202 having ATCC
Number 69313 comprising an expressible heterologous lux gene complex
under control of a dnaK stress inducible promoter sequence.
|
Claim 11
Nucleic acid molecules, comprising:
(a) a stress inducible promoter sequence; and (b) an expressible
bacterial lux gene complex under control of said promoter sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting environmental stress comprising exposing a detector
organism genetically engineered to contain an expressible lux gene
complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence (claim 1, 2)
- a method of detecting stress on a microorganism population comprising
exposing a detector organism genetically engineered to contain an expressible
lux gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter
sequence (claim 4)
- a transformed bioluminescent microorganism capable of an increase in
bioluminescence upon exposure to a sublethal level of environmental insult
(claim 7)
-
E. coli strains comprising an expressible heterologous lux
gene complex under control of a stress inducible promoter sequence (claim 10)
- nucleic acid molecules comprising a stress inducible promoter sequence and
an expressible bacterial lux gene complex (claim 11)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 5683868.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
| Remarks |
- National phase entry of WO 1994/13831 in Australia (AU 5730494) has lapsed
on 25 Aug 1995.
- National phase entry of WO 1994/13831 in South Africa (ZA 9309078) was
published as granted on 5 Jun 1995.
|
Search strategy
This patent was identified as reference to WO 1997/41251 titled
'Recombinant nucleic acid sequences and methods for determining both
genotoxicity and mutagenicity of a sample and the kinetics of the genetoxicity'
filed by VITO.
Patent application filed and patents owned by
Virta and Karp
Technology overview
A research team lead by Dr Matti Karp at the Department of Biotechnology,
University of Turku, created a 'shuttle vector' containing a replication of
origin for both E. coli and B. subtilis, and inserted a
firefly luciferase gene (lucFF). This plasmid pCSS810 was added with
either merR (mercury resistance gene, including the regulatory
(control) region), arsR (arsenic resistance gene, including the
regulatory (control) region), or cad (regulatory region of the cadmium
resistance gene), and introduced into E. coli and B. subtilis
to produce a reporter organism that detects mercury, arsenic or cadmium,
respectively. They have filed a PCT application, from which the US national
phase entry has been granted. Related journal articles concerning this research
are:
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or publication no.
|
Title, Independent claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
5776681
- Earliest priority - 17 Jan 1994
- Filed - 15 Sept 1995
- Granted - 7 Jul 1997
- Expected expiry - 15 Sept 2015
|
Title - Method for determining a metal present in a sample
Claim 1
A method for determining a heavy metal in a
sample comprising;
a) providing a cell comprising a recombinant DNA plasmid,
said plasmid comprising a gene coding for an insect luciferase or a green
fluorescent protein (GFP) marker protein, wherein the copy number of said
plasmid is under the control of a promoter regulatable by a heavy metal, and
wherein said promoter controls the origin of replication of said plasmid;
b) contacting said cell with a sample which contains said heavy metal; c)
allowing said heavy metal to affect said cell, whereafter the amount of said
marker protein is determined; d) comparing the amount of said marker
protein with a control in which no metal was present or in which the heavy metal
was present in a known amount, whereby the presence and/or amount of said heavy
metal is determined.
|
Claim 7
A method for the determination of a heavy metal in a sample, comprising:
a) providing a cell comprising a recombinant DNA plasmid, said plasmid
comprising a gene coding for an insect luciferase or a green fluorescent protein
(GFP) marker protein, and having a copy number between 1 and 2000/cell, wherein
the expression of said marker protein sequence being (missing?: under
the control of a promoter regulatable by?) a heavy metal, and wherein
said promoter controls the origin of the replication of said plasmid; b)
contacting said cell with a sample which contains said heavy metal; c)
allowing said heavy metal to affect said cell, whereafter the amount of said
marker protein is determined; d) comparing the amount of said marker
protein with a control in which no metal was present or in which it was present
in a known amount, whereby the presence and amount of said heavy metal is
determined.
|
Claim 22
The plasmid pMV1 (DSM Deposit No. 8708).
|
Claim 23
The plasmid pMV3 (DSM Deposit No. 8893).
|
Claim 24
The plasmid pTOO21 (DSM Deposit No. 9666).
|
Claim 25
The plasmid pTOO23 (DSM Deposit No. 9667).
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for determining a heavy metal in a sample comprising providing a
cell comprising a gene coding for an insect luciferase or a green fluorescent
protein (GFP) marker protein that is under the control of a promoter regulatable
by a heavy metal (claim 1)
- a method for determining a heavy metal in a sample comprising providing a
cell comprising a recombinant DNA plasmid comprising a gene coding for an insect
luciferase or a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker protein having a copy
number between 1 and 2000/cell (claim 7)
- plasmid pMV1 (claim 22)
- plasmid pMV3 (claim 23)
- plasmid pTOO21 (claim 24)
- plasmid pTOO23 (claim 25)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Heavy metals - There is no definition for this term. Examples provide
detection of mercury, arsenic, and cadmium.
- Sample - There is no definition for this term. Dependent claim 21 and 30
raise the following samples that may be tested: milk, foodstuffs or their
packaging materials, serum, urine, saliva, sediments, industrial process waters,
waste waters, and environmental waters.
- Cell - There is no definition for this term. Dependent claims 5 and 12
recite E. coli, and dependent claim 13 recites B. subtilis
cells.
Comments:
The four plasmids in the independent claims above contain the following
genes:
- plasmid pMV1 - merR linked to luc
- plasmid pMV3 - plasmid pMV1 with a low copy plasmid pOU61
- plasmid pTOO21 - arsR linked to luc
- plasmid pTOO23 - control region of cad linked to luc
|
Virta, Marko
Vähä-Hämeenkatu 12 B 27
20500 Turku/FI
Karp, Matti
Tapulikatu 6 A 22 20810 Turku/FI
|
|
WO
1995/19446
- Earliest priority - 17 Jan 1994
- Filed - 17 Jan 1995
- Published - 20 Jul 1995
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Method for determining a metal present in a sample
Claim 1
A method for determining a metal in a sample, characterized in that
a) a recombinant DNA plasmid the copy number of which is under the control
of a promotor regulatable by the metal is transferred into a cell; b)
the cell containing the recombinant DNA plasmid is contacted with the sample
which contains a metal, for example by incubating them together, in which case
the passing of the metal into the cell either is passive or there is a mechanism
for it in the cell; c) the metal is allowed to affect for a suitable
time the cell which contains the recombinant DNA plasmid, whereafter the amount
of recombinant DNA plasmid is determined by either physical or chemical
means; d) the amount of recombinant DNA plasmid is compared by chemical
or physical methods with a control test in which no metal was present and/or it
was present in a known amount in a reaction, whereby the presence and/or amount
of the metal can be determined.
|
Claim 9
A method for the determination of a metal in a sample, characterized in that
a) a recombinant DNA plasmid having a constant copy number between 1 and
2000/cell is transferred into a cell, and the plasmid contains as a marker
protein a DNA sequence coding for a virus, procaryotic cell or eucaryotic cell
protein, or a portion thereof, essential in terms of its biological activity,
the expression of the DNA sequence being under the control of a promoter
regulatable by means of the metal and being controlled by negative and/or
positive feedback; b) the cell containing the recombinant DNA plasmid is
contacted with a sample which contains metal, for example by incubating them
together, in which case the passing of the metal into the cell either is passive
or there is a separate mechanism for it in the cell; c) the metal is
allowed to affect for a suitable time the cell which contains the recombinant
DNA plasmid, whereafter the amount of protein coded for by recombinant DNA
plasmid is determined by either physical or chemical means; d) the
amount of the protein coded for by the recombinant DNA plasmid is compared by
chemical or physical means with a control test in which no metal was present
and/or it was present in a known amount in a reaction, whereby the presence
and/or amount of the metal can be determined.
|
Claim 26
The plasmid pMV1, which has been deposited with the depository DSM under
deposit number 8708.
|
Claim 27
The plasmid pMV3, which has been deposited with the depository DSM under
deposit number 8893.
|
Claim 28
The plasmid pTOO21, which has been deposited with the depository DSM under
deposit number 9666.
|
Claim 29
The plasmid pTOO23, which has been deposited with the depository DSM under
deposit number 9667.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for determining a metal in a sample (claim 1, 9)
- plasmid pMV1 (claim 26)
- plasmid pMV3 (claim 27)
- plasmid pTOO21 (claim 28)
- plasmid pTOO23 (claim 29)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 5776681 (see
above).
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
|
Remarks
|
- National phase entry of WO 1995/19446 in Europe (EP 689608) is deemed to be
withdrawn on 12 Feb 2003.
- Other related patent documents include FI 95484 (granted in Finland, patent
expired as reported on 31 Jul 2005 by INPADOC) and FI 95484 (published
unexamined application, expired as reported on 31 Jul 2005 by INPADOC).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
03/07/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
arsenate AND (Karp in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
9
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 9 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed and patents owned by
Bio-Orbit Oy
Technology overview
Dr Matti Korpela and Dr Matti Karp (Department of Biochemistry, University of
Turku at the time of filing) developed a recombinant DNA plasmid, the
replication of which could be regulated by an exogenous stimulant by subjecting
a constitutive promoter under the control of a repressor gene (high temperature
is provided in the examples in the patent document) and contained a luciferase
gene. This plasmid was introduced into E. coli, and was used as a
reporter that detects the presence of agents (e.g. cadmium, antibiotics, UV
light) that in any way affect the cell machinery by introducing a sample
containing an agent, inducing plasmid replication with the stimulant, and
detecting the level of decrease in light emission. The related non-patent
publication of this technology is Korpela M and Karp M (1988). Stable
light-producing Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 10(6):383-388.
Bio-Orbit Oy was a company based in Helsinki that developed and distributed
luminometers and related reagents. This company was later bought by Thermo
LabSystems Oy in 1999 (which is a subsidiary of Thermo Electron Corp., MA, USA).
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
EP
469021
- Earliest priority - 20 Apr 1989
- Filed - 20 Apr 1990
- Granted - 15 Nov 1995
- Expected expiry - 20 Apr 2010
|
Title - Determination of factors affecting gene regulation
and/or gene replication
Claim 1
A method for determining the presence or amount of a factor in a sample to be
tested, wherein the factor affects directly or indirectly the DNA, RNA and/or
proteins of the cell or the synthesis mechanisms thereof, characterized in
a) incubating a sample to be tested with a population of transformed cells
for a period sufficient to allow said factor, if present in the sample, to
affect said cells, said cells being transformed with a recombinant-DNA plasmid,
the replication of said plasmid being subject to a regulatable promoter, which
can be induced by an exogenous stimulus independent of replication of the cells;
b) then applying said exogenous stimulus to said cells to induce
replication of said plasmid, whereupon the copy number of the plasmid will begin
to increase in the cell, if the factor has not affected the plasmid by
inhibiting the replication; and c) the change in the copy number of the
recombinant-DNA plasmid in the cell is determined directly or indirectly, and
compared with a reference test in which the factor was not present or in which
it was present in a known amount, and thereby the presence or the amount of the
factor is determined.
|
Claim 8
A method for determining the presence or amount of a factor in a sample to be
tested, wherein the factor affects directly or indirectly the DNA, RNA and/or
proteins of the cell or the synthesis mechanisms thereof, characterized in
a) incubatiang a sample to be tested with a population of transformed cells
for a period sufficient to allow said factor, if present in the sample, to
affect said cells, said cells being transformed with a high copy number
recombinant DNA plasmid containing a DNA sequence encoding a marker protein or a
part thereof essential to the biological activity of said protein, said sequence
being coupled to a regulatable promoter such that expression of said marker
protein is inducible by an exogenous stimulus; b) then applying said
exogenous stimulus to said population of cells to induce expression of said
marker protein, whereby the amount of the marker protein in the cell starts to
grow, if the factor has not affected the protein synthesis directly or
indirectly; c) determining the amount of the marker protein expressed by
said population of cells, and comparing said amount with a reference test in
which the factor was not present or in which it was present in a known amount,
and thereby the presence or the amount of the factor is determined.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for determining the presence or amount of a factor that affects
directly or indirectly the DNA, RNA and/or proteins of the cell or the synthesis
mechanisms thereof (claim 1, 8)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 1990/12887.
Comments:
Designated contracting States at the time of grant are Germany (lapsed as
reported by INPADOC), Spain, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands.
The two independent claims introduced above in EP 469021 have been granted
without substantial limitations being added from WO 1990/12887.
|
Bio-Orbit Oy
(now owned by Thermo Labsystems Oy)
Ratastie 2 01620 Vantaa Finland
Ph +358-9-329100 Fax +358-9-32910500
|
|
US
6475719
- Earliest priority - 20 Apr 1989
- Filed - 21 Oct 1991
- Granted - 5 Nov 2002
- Expected expiry - 5 Nov 2022
|
Title - Determination of factors affecting gene regulation
and/or gene replication
Claim 1
A method for determining the presence or amount of at least one inhibitory
factor in the sample to be tested, wherein the inhibitory factor inhibits one or
more of DNA synthesis, transcription of DNA, translation of RNA, cell wall
synthesis, cell membrane function or metabolic functions which participate in or
influence these processes, said method comprising:
a) incubating a sample to be tested with a population of transformed cells
for a period sufficient to allow an inhibitory factor, if present in the sample,
to affect said cells, said cells being transformed with a recombinant DNA
plasmid, and replication of said plasmid being inducible by an exogenous
stimulus independent of replication of the cells and further wherein said cells
are sensitive to inhibition by the inhibitory factor; b) then applying said
exogenous stimulus to said cells in an amount sufficient to induce replication
of said plasmid in the absence of the inhibitory factor; and c) determining
the amount of DNA produced by said population of cells, the amount of the
inhibitory factor in said sample being correlated with a reduction in the amount
of DNA produced compared to the amount of DNA produced by a like cell population
by application of a like amount of exogenous stimulus in the absence of said
sample.
|
Claim 10
A method for determining the presence or amount of at least one inhibitory
factor in the sample to be tested, wherein the inhibitory factor inhibits one of
more of DNA synthesis, transcription of DNA, translation of RNA, cell wall
synthesis, cell membrane function or metabolic functions which participate in or
influence these processes, said method comprising:
a) incubating a sample to be tested with a population of transformed cells
for a period sufficient to allow the inhibitory factor, if present in the
sample, to affect said cells, said cells being transformed with a high copy
number recombinant DNA plasmid containing a sequence encoding a marker protein
which is detectable when expressed, said sequence being coupled to a regulatable
promoter such that expression of said marker protein is inducible by an
exogenous stimulus; b) then applying said exogenous stimulus to said
population of cells in an amount sufficient to induce expression of said marker
protein in the absence of the inhibitory factor; and c) determining the
amount of said marker protein expressed by said population of cells, the amount
of the inhibitory factor in the sample being correlated with a reduction in the
amount of said marker protein produced compared to the amount of said marker
protein produced by a like cell population by application of a like amount of
exogenous stimulus in the absence of the sample.
|
Claim 27
A method for determining the presence of at least one inhibitory factor
selected from the group consisting of ampicillin, chloramphenicol,
oxytetracycline, streptomycin, erythromycin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin,
actinomycin and trimethoprim in a sample of a biological fluid selected from the
group consisting of blood, plasma, serum, urine, semen and milk, said method
comprising:
a) obtaining a population of cells transformed with a high copy number
recombinant DNA plasmid containing a sequence encoding luciferase, wherein said
sequence is coupled to a regulatable promoter such that expression of said
sequence is inducible by application of a chemical inducer to cells containing
said plasmid; b) incubating said sample with said cell population in a
medium suitable for growth of said cells for a period sufficient to allow said
inhibitory factor if present to affect said cells; c) then applying said
chemical inducer to said cells in an amount which in the absence of said
inhibitory factor is sufficient to induce expression of said sequence; and
d) determining the amount of luciferase expressed by said cell population, the
amount of said inhibitory factor in said sample being correlated with the
reduction in the amount of luciferase produced relative to the amount of
luciferase produced by a like cell population by application of a like amount of
said chemical inducer in the absence of said sample.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for determining the presence or amount of at least one inhibitory
factor that inhibits one or more of DNA synthesis, transcription of DNA,
translation of RNA, cell wall synthesis, cell membrane function or metabolic
functions which participate in or influence these processes (claim 1, 10)
- a method for determining the presence of at least one inhibitory factor
(selected from the group consisting of eight entibiotics) in a sample of a
biological fluid (selected from the group consisting of six fluids) (claim 27)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 1990/12887.
Comments:
The main limitation that has been added to the granted independent claims
introduced above is that the reporting signal in response to an "inhibitory
factor" must be "a reduction in the amount of DNA produced" with cells exposed
to an inhibitory factor, when compared with cells without such exposure.
|
|
WO
1990/12887
- Earliest priority - 20 Apr 1989
- Filed - 20 Apr 1990
- Claims amended - 17 Sept 1990
- Published - 1 Nov 1990
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Determination of factors affecting gene regulation
and/or gene replication
Claim 1
A method for determining a factor affecting a cell, the factor affecting the
DNA, the RNA and/or proteins of the cell or the synthesis machineries thereof,
characterized in that
a) into the cell is transferred a recombinant DNA plasmid,
in which the starting point or points of the machinery responsible for the
replication are subject to a regulatable promoter, which can be
controlled either by a positive or a negative feedback; b) the cell
containing the recombinant DNA plasmid is brought into contact with the
affecting factor; c) the affecting factor is allowed to affect the cell
containing the recombinant DNA plasmid for a suitable time, and subsequently the
promoter regulating the starting point of the machinery responsible for the
replication of the recombinant DNA plasmid is activated, whereby the copy number
of the plasmid starts growing in the cell, unless the affecting factor has not
affected the plasmid in a manner inhibiting the replication; d) the shift
of the copy number of the recombinant DNA plasmid is determined directly or
indirectly.
|
Claim 8
A method for determining a factor affecting the cell, the factor affecting
directly or indirecty the DNA, RNA and/or proteins of the cell or their
synthesis machineries, characterized in that
a) to the cell is transferred a recombinant DNA plasmid, present in
many copies in the cell and the plasmid contains as a
marker protein a protein of a virus, a procaryotic cell or an
eucaryotic cell or a DNA sequence encoding a part essential with regard to its
biological activity, the expression of which is subject to a regulatable
promoter and is controlled either by a negative or a positive feedback; b)
the cell containing the recombinant DNA plasmid is brought into contact with the
affecting factor; c) the affecting factor is allowed to affect the cell
containing the recombinant DNA plasmid for a suitable time, after which the
regulatable promoter controlling the expression of the marker protein of the
recombinant DNA plasmid is activated, whereby the amount of marker protein in
the cell starts to grow, unless the affecting factor has affected the protein
synthesis directly or indirectly; d) the change of the amount/activity of
the marker protein encoded by the recombinant DNA plasmid is measured.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method for determining the presence or amount of a factor that affects
directly or indirectly the DNA, RNA and/or proteins of the cell or the synthesis
mechanisms thereof (claim 1, 8)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Cell - procaryotic and eucaryotic organisms
- Regulatable promoter - there is no definition for this term, therefore there
is no apparent limitation on the type of regulatable promoter that can be used.
A subsequent dependent claim recites the following promoter sequences: "a strong
promoter selected from the group consisting of lambda PL
and PR promoters, lac, trp, and hybrid tac promoters". The
term 'regulatable promoter' may be different to the definition of 'inducible
promoter' that is used in other bioindicator systems, as the 'regulatable
promoter' in this patent application is a constitutive promoter that is
repressed by a repressor gene, whereas an 'inducible promoter' is a
non-constitutive promoter that is directly induced when a stimulant is present.
- Many copies - there is no definition for this term. Examples of plasmid copy
numbers that are provided in the specification are:
- pCSS112 (ori under control of the PL promoter
from lambda phage) - 60
- pCSS108 (ori under control of the lac promoter from
E. coli) - 600
- Marker protein - there is no limitation on the type of marker protein that
can be used. A subsequent dependent claim recites the following genes:
"selected from the group consisting of alpha-amylase, alkaline phosphatase,
β-galactosidase, luciferase, peroxidase, T4 lysozyme, β-glucuronidase,
oxidoreductase and pyrophosphatase".
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
The term 'regulatable promoter' is different to the definition of 'inducible
promoter' that is used in other bioindicator systems, as the 'regulatable
promoter' in this patent application is a constitutive promoter that is
repressed by a repressor gene, whereas an 'inducible promoter' is a
non-constitutive promoter that is directly induced when a stimulant is present.
|
|
Remarks
|
Two related patents have been granted in Finland (FI 891899, granted 31 Aug
2004; FI 88309, granted 31 Aug 2004).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
03/07/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
cadmium AND (Korpela in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
3
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 3 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed by Eawag Eidg.Anstalt Fur Wasserversorgung
Technology overview
Dr Jan Roelof van der Meer (at the Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental
Science and Technology (EAWAG) at the time of filing) developed transgenic
E. coli that detects arsenic pollutants in water samples by introducing
into E. coli DH5-alpha a plasmid containing (in 5' to 3' order) the
arsR promoter (containing first ArsR binding site), arsR,
second ArsR binding site, and luxAB. Introduction of the second ArsR
binding site after arsR reduces background expression of luciferase,
thereby enhancing the senstitivity of arsenate/arsenite detection by 200 fold.
Elimination of background luminescense also enabled development of a simple
colorimetric test for arsenate/arsenite detection. The related non-patent
publication of this technology is Stocker J, Balluch D, Gsell M, Harms H,
Feliciano J, Daunert S, Malik KA, van der Meer JR. (2003). Development of a set
of simple bacterial biosensors for quantitative and rapid measurements of
arsenite and arsenate in potable water.
Environ
Sci Technol. 37(20):4743-50.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
EP 1367134
- Earliest priority - 31 May 2002
- Filed - 31 May 2002
- Application deemed to be withdrawn - 16 Mar 2005
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Method of detecting arsenic ions with indicator
bacteria
Claim 1
A biologically based test system for the detection of inorganic and organic
pollutants in water samples comprising
- a genetically modified bacterium producing a marker protein upon induction
of a regulatory protein, wherein
- the activity of said regulatory protein is induced by the presence of said
pollutant, characterized in that said genetically modified bacterium comprises
at least one additional DNA binding site for the regulatory protein.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a biologically based test system for the detection of inorganic and organic
pollutants in water samples (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 2005/255444.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
Eawag Eidg.Anstalt Fur Wasserversorgung (AU 2003/240673, EP
1367134, WO 2003/102223)
Uberlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf
Switzerland
Ph +41 (0)44 823 55 11
Fax +41 (0)44 823 50 28
UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH (EP 1509616,
US 2005/255444)
Permoserstrasse 15
04318 Leipzig
Germany
Technology transfer patents and license contacts:
Dr. Matthias Remmler
E-mail: matthias.remmler@ufz.de
Ph +49 (0)341 235 2114
Fax +49 (0)341 235 2745
Michaela Pampel
E-mail: michaela.pampel@ufz.de
Ph +49 (0)341 235-2337
Fax +49 (0)341 235-2575
|
|
US
2005/255444
- Earliest priority - 31 May 2002
- Filed - 9 Jun 2005
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Method of detecting arcenic ions with indicator
bacteria
Claim 20
A biologically based test system for the detection of inorganic and organic
pollutants in water samples, comprising
- a genetically modified bacterium producing a
marker protein upon induction of a regulatory
protein, wherein
- the activity of said regulatory protein is induced by the presence of said
pollutant, wherein said genetically modified bacterium comprises at least one
additional DNA binding site for the regulatory protein.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a biologically based test system for the detection of inorganic and organic
pollutants in water samples (claim 20)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Pollutant - there is no definition for this term. Subsequent dependent
claims recite that the pollutant be "inorganic" or "arsenite and arsenate".
- Bacterium - there is no limit on the type of bacterium that may be used.
Subsequent dependent claims recite that the bacterium be "selected from the
group comprising the bacteria Ralstonia metallidurens, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli".
- Marker protein - the activity... is usually measured by a
luminometer. A subsequent dependent claim recites the marker protein to be
"selected from the group consisting of alkaline phosphatase (PhoA),
chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT-gene), catechol dioxygenase (XyIE),
bacterial luciferase (LuxAB), eukaryotic luciferase (Luc) beta-galactosidase
(LacZ), and green fluorescent protein (GFP)".
- Regulatory protein - there is no definition for this term. A subsequent
dependent claim recites the regulatory protein to be "the ArsR protein of the
ars operon of the plasmid R773 or any other ArsR protein...".
Comments:
Claims 1-20 have been cancelled.
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently there
are no enforceable rights.
|
|
WO
2003/102223
- Earliest priority - 31 May 2002
- Filed - 19 May 2003
- Published - 11 Dec 2003
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Method of detecting arcenic ions with indicator
bacteria
Claim 1
A biologically based test system for the detection of inorganic and organic
pollutants in water samples comprising
- a genetically modified bacterium producing a marker protein upon induction
of a regulatory protein, wherein
- the activity of said regulatory protein is induced by the presence of said
pollutant, characterized in that said genetically modified bacterium comprises
at least one additional DNA binding site for the regulatory protein.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a biologically based test system for the detection of inorganic and organic
pollutants in water samples (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 2005/255444.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
| Remarks |
- National phase entry of WO 2003/102223 in Australia (AU 2003/240673) has
lapsed on 4 Feb 2005.
- National phase entry of WO 2003/102223 in Europe (EP 1509616) is
pending.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
03/07/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
zinc AND (meer in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
33
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 33 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Detection of explosives
Summary
Explosives, in particular landmines have been heavily used as
warfare since the end of World War II. The International Campaign to Ban
Landmines (www.icbl.org) have estimated the number of landmine affected nations
to exceed 80 and annual casualties due to landmines between 15000 and 20000 as
of January 2004. Several countries including Russia, United States, and some
Asian countries still produce antipersonnel landmines. Along with development
of landmines in such countries that are becoming more difficult to detect, there
is ongoing development in the scientific field of their detection. Current
methods of landmine and explosive detection are:[add a comment]
- visual detection
- hand-held detectors (from simple sticks to survey subsurface ordianats to
electronic metal detectors)
- sniffer dogs
- x-ray devices
All of the methods above have a common critical problem in that
they require the operating human being to be close to the landmine or explosive
that is to be detected. Areal surveys have not yet delivered an effective
remote sensing method, as landmines can be contained plastic casings that can
not be picked up by radar. Molecular biologists and biotech companies such as
Dr Michael Deyholos at the University of Alberta, Dr Robert Burlage at the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, Dr C. Neal Stewart, Jr. at the University
of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, and Aresa Biodetection have considered
use of genetically modified organisms that detect chemicals leaching from the
landmines as an alternative to the above mentioned manual survey methods.[add a comment]
This chapter contains a granted US patent owned by Lockheed Martin
Energy Research Corporation, which claims a method to detect explosives using a
recombinant microorganism.[add a comment]
Similar to the chapter on detection of metal and other toxic
compounds, chapter 7 - Biosensing systems contains a patent family with examples
of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants that detect explosives and
landmines. (WO 2003/100068: Reporter system for plants by Aresa Biodetection
APS). However, as the patent documents in this family are applications that
have claims that are broader in scope than the examples, they are not presented
in this chapter.[add a comment]
Reference
Hussein EM, Waller EJ. (2000). Landmine detection: the problem
and the challenge.
Appl
Radiat Isot. 53(4-5):557-63.[add a comment]
Moszynski P. (2004). Landmine casualties are falling, but the
wounded need more help.
BMJ.
329(7477):1256.[add a comment]
Patent owned by Lockheed Martin Energy Research
Corporation
Technology overview
Lockheed Martin Corporation is a US company (headquarters located in
Bethesda, Maryland) that conducts business in the areas of aeronautics,
electronic systems, IT services, integrated systems and solutions, and space
systems. Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation (Lockheed Martin facility
in Oak Ridge, Tennessee) manages the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, where Dr
Robert Burlage conducted research on transgenic Bacillus subtilis that
can detect explosives (as indicated by the presence of trinitrotoluene, TNT).
The inventors have enabled the technology described in this granted US patent by
providing an example producing transgenic Bacillus subtilis containing
the salt stress gene (csb) regulatory element of B. subtilis
upstream of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene from Aequorea
victoria.
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or Publication No.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
5972638
- Earliest priority - 31 Jan 1997
- Filed - 31 Jan 1997
- Granted - 26 Oct 1999
- Expected expiry - 31 Jan 2017
|
Title - Method for detection of buried explosives using a
biosensor
|
Claim 1
A method of detecting explosives buried beneath the surface of the ground,
comprising:
- spraying a biological sensor comprising a
recombinant bacterial organism that responds to contact with
said explosives by producing a detectable signal, on the
surface of the ground in an area believed to be contaminated by said buried
explosives, so that the biological sensor contacts soil of said surface of said
ground believed to contain the buried explosives;
- allowing a sufficient time to pass to enable the biological
sensor to react with explosive residue in said soil to produce a visually
detectable signal; and
-
examining said surface of the ground believed to contain
said buried explosives for said visually detectable signal.
|
|
Claim 15
A method of detecting explosives buried beneath the surface of the ground,
comprising the steps of:
1) spraying a biological sensor comprising a recombinant bacterial organism
that responds to contact with said explosives by producing a detectable signal
on the surface of the ground in an area believed to contain said buried
explosives, wherein said surface of said ground is believed to be contaminated
by vapors from said explosives, under conditions such that said biological
sensor contacts the soil of said surface of said ground believed to contain the
buried explosives;
2) allowing a sufficient time to pass to enable the biological sensor to
react with explosive residue from said buried explosives in said soil to produce
a visually detectable signal; and
3) examining said soil of said ground surface believed to contain said buried
explosives for said visually detectable signal.
|
|
Claim 22
A method of detecting explosive residue in soil comprising the steps of:
a) providing:
i) a biological sensor comprising a recombinant bacterial strain, and
ii) a soil sample suspected of containing detectable levels of
explosive residue; and
b) contacting said soil sample with said biological sensor under conditions
such that a detectable signal is produced in the presence of said detectable
levels of explosive residue.
|
|
Claim 29
A method of detecting explosive residue in soil comprising the steps of:
a) providing:
i) a biological sensor comprising a recombinant bacterial strain, wherein
said recombinant bacterial strain is selected from the group consisting of
recombinant Pseudomonas, Escherichia and Bacillus,
and ii) a soil sample suspected of containing detectable levels of
explosive residue; and
b) contacting said soil sample with said biological sensor under conditions
such that a detectable signal is produced in the presence of said detectable
levels of explosive residue.
|
|
Claim 30
A biological sensor for detecting explosives comprising a recombinant
bacterial strain that responds to contacting a chemical from an explosive by
producing a detectable signal, wherein said recombinant bacterial strain is
selected from the group consisting of recombinant Bacillus,
Pseudomonas, and Escherichia coli.
|
|
Claim 35
A biological sensor for detecting explosives comprising a recombinant
bacterial strain that responds to contacting a chemical from an explosive by
producing a detectable signal, wherein
- said recombinant bacterial strain is selected from the group consisting of
recombinant Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia
coli, and wherein
- said chemical from said explosive is selected from the group consisting of
trinitrotoluene, hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine and
octahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting explosives buried beneath the surface of the ground
comprising use of a recombinant bacterial organism that responds to contact with
the explosives by producing a detectable signal (claims 1 & 15)
- a method of detecting explosive residue in soil comprising use of a
recombinant bacterial strain (claim 22)
- a method of detecting explosive residue in soil comprising use of a
recombinant Pseudomonas, Escherichia or Bacillus
strain (claim 29)
- a biological sensor for detecting explosives comprising a recombinant
bacterial strain that responds to contacting a chemical from an explosive by
producing a detectable signal (claims 30 & 35)
Definitions extracted from the description (and ambiguous terms) are:
- Biological sensor - a living cell that responds to a chemical from an
explosive by producing a detectable signal
- Recombinant (bacterial) organism - a strain of (bacterial) organisms
comprising recombinant DNA
- Detectable signal - a visual signal
- Sufficeint time - duration is not specified
- Examining (for the visually detectable signal) - method is not specified
Comment:
Independent claim 1 of granted US 5972638 limits the type of biosensor used
in the method to detect explosives to recombinant bacterial organisms.
Therefore use of RedDetect transgenic Arabidopsis plants developed by
Aresa Biodetection APS to detect explosives (see chapter 7 Biosensing systems -
Patent applications filed and patent owned by Aresa Biodetection APS) will not
infringe on US 5972638.
|
Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation
(Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL)
P.O. BOX 2008 OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE 37831
Ph +1-865-574-4160
ORNL has a technology transfer website:
http://www.ornl.gov/adm/tted/
FAQ directs technology transfer interests to Casey Porto (portoca@ornl.gov).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
03/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
Burlage in inventor
|
|
Results
|
7
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 7 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on the full name of the
inventor, abstract and a review of the claims.
|
General bioindicator systems
Summary
This chapter consists of patent documents describing biosensing
systems that do not specify a detecting substance in the first independent
claim. Many of these patent documents disclose alternative detection methods,
reporter organism, or genes compared to the common transgenic organism with an
inducible promoter: reporter gene construct:[add a comment]
- a plant reporter system containing a non-plant reporter gene (Aresa
Biodetection APS)
- genes involved in plant pigment synthesis as reporter genes (Edenspace
Systems Corp.)
- lyophilized transgenic bacterium biodetector (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and
Co.)
- transgenic zebrafish to detect water contaminants (University of Cincinnati)
- use of hpd (gene coding for p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid
dioxygenase) as a reporter gene for biosensors (Greenovation Biotech GmbH)
- a biosensing device containing a transformed bacterium (University of
Tennessee Research Corp.)
- a reporter bacterium from wastewater sludge (Eastman Chemical Co.)
- a biosensing system containing a a second 'control' transgenic microorganism
with constitutive reporter expression (VITO)
Patent applications filed and patent owned by Aresa Biodetection
APS
Company overview
Aresa is a Danish Biotechnology company that conducts R&D in
areas of biosensors and biopharma. They have developed three transgenic
Arabidopsis thaliana plants that function as bioindicators:
1. RedDetect - transgenic A. thaliana plant that detects landmines by
change in plant color.
2. RedDetect UXO - transgenic A. thaliana plant that detects unexploded
ordnance (UXO) by change in plant color.
3. RedScreen - transgenic A. thaliana plant that can be engineered to
detect unfavorable stress conditions by change in plant color.[add a comment]
Technology overview
Aresa has filed a series of patent applications (one of which has
been granted in New Zealand, see below) that are generally drawn towards a
reporter system that includes a gene involved in the development of a
monitorable trait. The scope of the independent claim in the applications is
broad considering the fact that neither the gene or the stimulus in this
reporter system is particularly specified, however these applications do not
have enforceable rights until they are granted in the respective jurisdictions.
[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication No.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
NZ 536874
- Earliest priority - 29 May 2002
- Filed - 30 May 2003
- Granted - 24 Mar 2005
- Expected expiry - 30 May 2023
|
Title - Reporter system for plants
Claim 1
A reporter system giving rise to a directly monitorable phenotypic trait in a
plant in the presence of solely an outer stimulus, said
reporter system comprising
- a gene which is not part of the natural plant genome encoding a product
which is involved in the development of said directly monitorable phenotypic
trait in response to the presence of said outer stimulus.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- A reporter system comprising a gene encoding a product that is involved in
the development of a phenotypic trait that is directly monitorable in response
to the presence of an outer stimulus (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 2003/100068.
Comments:
NZ 536874 is the only granted patent from this patent family that is reported
on INPADOC.
The difference between claim 1 in NZ 536874 and WO 2003/100068 (see below)
are:
- the absence of term 'capable' in describing the function of the reporter
system in the preamble
- addition of term 'solely' in describing the condition of the reporter system
to express a phenotypic trait
|
Aresa Biodetection APS
Symbion Science Park
Fruebjergvej 3
2100 København Ø
Ph +45-70227747
Fax +45-70227757
|
|
US
2005/289662
- Earliest priority - 29 May 2002
- Filed - 30 May 2003
- Published - 29 Dec 2005
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Reporter system for plants
Claim 1
A reporter system giving rise to a directly monitorable phenotypic trait in a
plant in the presence of solely an outer stimulus, said
reporter system comprising
- a gene which is not part of the natural plant genome encoding a product
which is involved in the development of said directly monitorable phenotypic
trait in response to the presence of said outer stimulus.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- A reporter system comprising a gene encoding a product that is involved in
the development of a phenotypic trait that is directly monitorable in response
to the presence of an outer stimulus (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 2003/100068.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
The difference between claim 1 in US 2005/289662 and WO 2003/100068 (see
below) are the same as those for NZ 536874 (see above).
|
|
WO
2003/100068
- Earliest priority - 29 May 2002
- Filed - 30 May 2003
- Published - 4 Dec 2003
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Reporter system for plants
Claim 1
A reporter system capable of giving rise to a directly
monitorable phenotypic trait in a plant in the presence of an outer stimulus,
said reporter system comprising
- a gene encoding a product which is involved in the development of said
directly monitorable phenotypic trait in response to the
presence of said outer stimulus.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- A reporter system comprising a gene encoding a product that is involved in
the development of a phenotypic trait that is directly monitorable in response
to the presence of an outer stimulus (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- Reporter system - any system which is able to transform a stimulus into
another feature which can be monitored or measured.
- Directly monitorable phenotypic trait - any phenotype of physical or
chemical nature which may be monitored without the need for sampling.
- Outer stimulus - any stimulus of external origin of chemical or physical
nature which affects a plant.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
The body of claim 1 (which is the content in the dot point) does not contain
the term 'plant', therefore it can be interpreted as the 'gene encoding a
product' being able to be used in any organism including plants.
The inventors have enabled the technology described in this application by
providing methods in the examples to produce transgenic A. thaliana
plants that detect/bind to heavy metals or nitro-containing compounds with
constructs containing the following sensor/binding gene and reporter gene
combinations:
Heavy metal detection
|
Sensor gene
|
Reporter gene
|
|
GSH1 promoter (glutamate-cysteine ligase chloroplast isoform)
GSH2 promoter (glutathione synthase)
PCS1 promoter (gene bank accession AF461180)
PCS2 promoter (gene bank accession AY044049)
GST30 promoter (glutathione S-transferase)
CAD1 promoter (phytochelatin synthase)
|
CHS (chalcone synthase)
LUC (luciferase)
GFP (green fluorescent protein)
|
Heavy metal binding
|
Promoter gene
|
Heavy metal binding gene
|
|
35S
|
GSH1
GSH2
CAD1
Nramp1 (gene bank accession AF165125)
Nramp2 (gene bank accession AF141240)
PCS1
PCS2
|
Nitro-containing compound detection
|
Sensor gene
|
Reporter gene
|
|
Nr1 promoter (nitrate reductase 1)
Nr2 promoter (nitrate reductase 2)
Nii promoter (nitrite reductase)
Ntr-2-1 promoter (high-affinity nitrate transporter ACH2)
|
CHS
LUC
GFP
|
Nitro-containing compound metabolism
|
Promoter gene
|
Nitro-compound metabolism gene
|
|
35S
|
Nr1
Nr2
Nii
Ntr-2-1
XenA (xenobiotic reductase A)
XenB (xenobiotic reductase B)
Onr (pentaerythriol tetranitrate reductase)
|
|
| Remarks |
- National phase entry of WO 2003/100068 in Australia (AU 2003/240150), Europe
(EP 1511847), China (CN 1656228) and Japan (JP 2005/534292) are pending.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
12/04/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
Aresa in applicant
|
|
Results
|
1
|
|
Comments
|
|
Patent application filed by Edenspace Systems Corporation and the
University of Arizona
Company overview
Edenspace Systems Corp. is a US biotechnology R&D company
located in Virginia that produces transgenic plants for use in environmental
protection and renewable fuels. Main products and services include:[add a comment]
- Phytoremediation of heavy metals, metalloids and organic compounds.
- Soil and groundwater assessment and remediation.
- Biodetection and biomonitoring of environmental contaminants.
Technology overview
The US patent application described in this section discloses use
of anthocyanin synthesis as a reporter system in transgenic plant biosensors.
Examples in the specification provide a method to produce transgenic plants that
detect heavy metals with a construct containing anthocyanin regulatory gene B
that is fused to the BjMTP1 promoter (BjMTP, Brassica juncea metal
tolerance protein), which was introduced into Arabidopsis and
Maize.[add a comment]
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2005/114923
- Earliest priority - 1 Jul 2003
- Filed - 1 Jul 2004
- Published - 26 May 2005
- Granted - not applicable
|
Title - Plant biosensor systems
|
Claim 1
A nucleic acid construct comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a
plant pigment, said gene being operably linked to an
inducible sensor system, wherein the sensor system is
responsive to the presence of a contaminant.
|
|
Claim 26
A transgenic plant cell comprising a
transgene comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system, wherein the
sensor system is responsive to the presence of a contaminant.
|
|
Claim 49
A transgenic plant exhibiting a change in color phenotype when exposed to a
contaminant, the transgenic plant comprising a transgene comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system which is
responsive to the presence of a contaminant.
|
|
Claim 75
A transgenic plant exhibiting different changes in color phenotype when
exposed to different contaminants, the transgenic plant comprising more than one
transgene, each transgene comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system which is
responsive to the presence of a particular contaminant and whose induction by
that particular contaminant is associated with a specific change in color
phenotype.
|
|
Claim 76
A method for preparing a transgenic plant exhibiting a change in color
phenotype when exposed to a contaminant, the method comprising:
1. introducing a nucleic acid construct into a plant cell or protoplast to
obtain a stably transformed plant cell or protoplast, the
construct comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system, wherein the
sensor system is responsive to the presence of the contaminant;
2. regenerating a whole plant from the stably transformed plant cell or
protoplast to obtain a transgenic plant comprising a transgene comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system, wherein the
sensor system is responsive to the presence of the contaminant; and
3. exposing the transgenic plant to the contaminant.
|
|
Claim 105
A method for detecting the presence of a contaminant in an area, the method
comprising:
1. introducing, in the area to be tested, seeds from a transgenic plant
comprising a transgene comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system, wherein the
sensor system is responsive to the presence of the contaminant;
2. growing transgenic plants from the seeds;
3. monitoring the color phenotype of the resulting plants; and
4. determining that the contaminant is present in the area tested if a change
in color phenotype was observed in the resulting plants.
|
|
Claim 131
A method for detecting the presence of contaminants in an area, the method
comprising:
1. introducing, in the area to be tested, seeds from a transgenic plant
comprising more than one transgene, each transgene comprising:
- a gene encoding a product involved in the biosynthesis of a plant pigment,
said gene being operably linked to an inducible sensor system which is
responsive to the presence of a particular contaminant and whose induction by
that particular contaminant is associated with a specific change in color
phenotype;
2. growing transgenic plants from the seeds;
3. monitoring the color phenotype of the resulting plants; and
4. determining that a particular contaminant is present in the area tested if
the associated change in color phenotype was observed in the resulting plants.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a nucleic acid construct comprising a gene encoding a product involved in
the biosynthesis of a plant pigment (claim 1)
- a transgenic plant cell comprising a gene encoding a product involved in the
biosynthesis of a plant pigment (claim 26)
- a transgenic plant exhibiting a change in color phenotype when exposed to a
contaminant (claim 49)
- a transgenic plant exhibiting different changes in color phenotype when
exposed to different contaminants (claim 75)
- a method for preparing a transgenic plant exhibiting a change in color
phenotype when exposed to a contaminant (claim 76)
- a method for detecting the presence of contaminants in an area (claims 105,
131)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- Nucleic acid product - a polynucleotide or oligonucleotide comprising
nucleic acid sequences not normally associated in nature
- Product - a gene product (e.g., primary transcript, mRNA, pre-protein,
protein, or higher order complex)
- Operably linked - a relationship between two nucleic acid sequences wherein
the expression of one of the nucleic acid sequences is controlled by, regulated
by or modulated by the other nucleic acid sequence
- (Inducible) sensor system - a polynucleotide which is, in some manner,
dependent upon an external stimulus (such as the presence of a contaminant) in
order to actively transcribe and/or translate a gene to which it is operably
linked
- Contaminant - any compound, molecule, agent or entity whose presence and/or
level in an area or environment is to be detected
- Transgene - an exogenous gene which, when introduced into a host cell
through the hand of man, for example, using a process such as transformation,
electroporation, particle bombardment, and the like, is expressed by the host
cell and integrated into the cell's DNA such that the trait or traits produced
by the expression of the transgene is inherited by the progeny of the
transformed cell
- Plant - can refer to a whole plant, plant parts (e.g., cuttings, tubers,
pollen), plant organs (e.g., leaves, stems, flowers, roots, fruits, branches,
etc.), individual plant cells, groups of plant cells (e.g., cultured plant
cells), protoplasts, plant extracts, seeds, and progeny thereof.
- Stably transformed - a cell, callus or protoplast in which an inserted
exogenous nucleic acid molecule is capable of replication either as an
autonomously replicating plasmid or as part of the host chromosome
- Area - not specified in the description, other than that the contaminant may
be present in the air, in water or in a soil.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
Four examples provided in the specification are:
- Transgenic Plants For the Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds - method
to identify and validate genes that are up-regulated in plants exposed to
benzene and formaldehyde (no results provided).
- Identification of Genes Up-Regulated by Heavy Metals - method to identify
and validate genes that are up-regulated in plants exposed to one or more of the
metals, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel, lead, selenium and
zinc (no results provided).
- Generation of Transgenic Plants for Heavy Metal Detection - method to
generate transgenic Arabidopsis and Maize containing
BjMTP1 promoter::GFP or BjMTP1 promoter::anthocyanin regulatory
gene B (no results on tests for anthocyanin accumulation in the transgenic
plants exposed to heavy metals).
- Transgenic Plants as Biomarkers for Heavy Metals in Drinking Water - method
to detect BjMTP mRNA expression in Brassica juncea seedlings exposed to
arsenic, cadmium, and lead in water (no results provided).
|
Edenspace Systems Corporation
3810 Concorde Parkway, Suite 100
Dulles, VA, 20151-1131
Toll-free +1-877-961-8777
Tel +1-703-961-8700
Fax +1-703-961-8939
University of Arizona
(THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS)
Office of Technology Transfer
888 N. EUCLID AVENUE, PO BOX 210158
OTT, ROOM 204
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85721-0158
The following two contacts for licensing were listed in the contact
information site:
Dubuque, Suzanne, PhD
Licensing Associate / Life Sciences
(520) 626-1213
sdubuque@ott.arizona.edu
Trammell, Mary Louise "Mike", PhD
Senior Licensing Associate / Life Sciences
(520) 626-7916
trammell@email.arizona.edu
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
19/04/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
Edenspace in applicant
|
|
Results
|
1
|
|
Comments
|
|
Patent applications filed and patents owned by E. I. du Pont de
Nemours and Company
Technology overview
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. is a multinational company that
conducts R&D in the science field including agriculture, electronics, health
care, safety and protection. The patent family described below discloses a
method to detect sublethal levels of environmental contaminants using a
lyophilized trangenic bacterium containing a luxCDABE gene complex that
is under the control of a stress-inducible promoter. Related scientific
publications are:[add a comment]
- Van Dyk et al. (1994). Rapid and sensitive pollutant detection by
induction of heat shock gene-bioluminescence gene fusions.
Appl
Environ Microbiol. 60(5):1414-20. (dnaKp::lux or
grpEp::lux into E. coli)
- Van Dyk et al. (1995). Synergistic induction of the heat shock
response in Escherichia coli by simultaneous treatment with chemical
inducers.
J
Bacteriol. 177(20):6001-4. (lonp::lux into E. coli)
- Van Dyk et al. (1995). Responses to toxicants of an
Escherichia coli strain carrying a uspA'::lux genetic fusion
and an E. coli strain carrying a grpE'::lux fusion are
similar.
Appl
Environ Microbiol. 61(11):4124-7. (uspAp::lux into E.
coli)
- Belkin et al. (1996). Oxidative stress detection with
Escherichia coli harboring a katG'::lux fusion.
Appl
Environ Microbiol. 62(7):2252-6. (katGp::lux into E.
coli)
- Vollmer et al. (1997). Detection of DNA damage by use of
Escherichia coli carrying recA'::lux, uvrA'::lux, or
alkA'::lux reporter plasmids.
Appl
Environ Microbiol. 63(7):2566-71. (recAp::lux,
uvrAp::lux, or alkAp::lux into E. coli)
- Wagner and Van Dyk (1998). Cryopreservation and reawakening.
Methods
Mol Biol. 102:123-7.
- Van Dyk (1998). Stress detection using bioluminescent reporters of the
heat-shock response.
Methods
Mol Biol. 1998;102:153-60. (review)
- Bechor et al. (2002). Recombinant microorganisms as environmental
biosensors: pollutants detection by Escherichia coli bearing
fabA'::lux fusions.
J
Biotechnol. 94(1):125-32. (fabAp::lux into E. coli)
Many of the transgenic E. coli containing an inducible
promoter :: reporter gene construct are provided in the examples of WO
1994/13831, also filed by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (see chapter 5 -
Detection of metals and other toxic compounds).[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication No.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
CA 2200702
- Earlliest priority - 23 Nov 1994
- Filed - 20 Nov 1995
- Granted - 5 Dec 2000
- Lapsed - 21 Nov 2005
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Lyophilized bioluminescent bacterial reagent for the
detection of toxicants
Claim 1
A method of detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental
insult with a lyophilized biological reagent, said reagent comprising
- a detector prokaryote microorganism containing an
expressible luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a
stress inducible promoter sequence, the method comprising the
steps of:
(i) rehydrating the lyophilized biological reagent in a
suitable amount of water wherein a baseline bioluminescence is
produced;
(ii) immediately contacting the rehydrated reagent with a sample suspected of
containing an environmental insult to form a reagent mixture;
(iii) incubating the mixture for at least 20 minutes and at a temperature of up
to 30°C and;
(iv) detecting a change in bioluminescence from the mixture.
|
Claim 5
A lyophilized biological reagent comprising
- a transformed bacteria containing an expressible luxCDABE gene
complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence.
|
Claim 6
A kit for detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult
comprising the following in packaged combination:
(i) an aliquoted lyophilized biological reagent comprising;
(a) a detector prokaryotic microorganism cell containing a DNA fragment
comprising a stress inducible promoter operably linked to the
luxCDABE gene complex;
(b) a suitable buffer, and
(c) a cryoprotective reagent;
(ii) a rehydrating reagent; and
(iii) a suitable growth media.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult with
a prokaryote microorganism containing an expressible luxCDABE gene
complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter (claim 1)
- a lyophilized biological reagent comprising a bacteria transformed with an
expressible luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a stress
inducible promoter sequence (claim 5)
- a kit for detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult
comprising a prokaryotic microorganism cell containing a DNA fragment comprising
a stress inducible promoter operably linked to the luxCDABE gene
complex (claim 6)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- (Environmental) insult - any substance or environmental change that results
in an alteration of normal cellular metabolism in a bacterial cell or population
of cells
- Detector (prokaryote micro)organism - a prokaryote microorganism which
contains a gene fusion consisting of a stress inducible promoter fused to the
lux gene complex (luxCDABE gene complex) and which is capable
of expressing the lux gene products in response to an environmental
insult
- Stress inducible promoter - any promoter capable of activating a stress gene
and causing the expression of the stress gene product
- Bioluminescence - phenomenon of light emission from any living organism
- Lyophilized biological reagent - a detector organism which contains a gene
fusion consisting of a stress inducible promoter fused to the lux gene complex
and which is freeze-dried in a specific medium and is capable of expressing the
lux gene products in response to an environmental insult, immediately upon
rehydration
- Operably linked - the fusion of two fragments of DNA in a proper orientation
and reading frame to be transcribed into functional RNA.
Comments:
As this patent has lapsed due to non-payment of maintenance fees, this patent
currently does not have any enforceable rights.
|
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
1007 MARKET STREET WILMINGTON, DE 19898
Licensing information:
Ph +1-(781) 972-0607
Email dupont@yet2.com
DuPont has a website called 'DuPont Technology Bank', which contains
information on licensing patented technology by their company:
http://dupont.t2h.yet2.com/t2h/page/homepage/
|
|
EP
793729
- Earlliest priority - 23 Nov 1994
- Filed - 20 Nov 1995
- Granted - 21 Aug 2002
- Expected expiry - 20 Nov 2015
|
Title - Lyophilized bioluminescent bacterial reagent for the
detection of toxicants
Claim 1
A method of detecting the presence of an environmental insult with a
lyophilized biological reagent said reagent comprising a detector organism
containing an expressible lux gene complex under the control of a
stress inducible promoter sequence, the method comprising the steps of:
(i) rehydrating the lyophilized biological reagent in a suitable amount of
water wherein a baseline bioluminescence is produced;
(ii) immediately contacting the rehydrated reagent with a sample suspected of
containing an environmental insult to form a reagent mixture;
(iii) incubating the mixture for at least 20 minutes and at a temperature of up
to 300˚C and;
(iv) detecting a change in bioluminescence from the mixture.
|
Claim 10
A lyophilized biological reagent comprising a transformed bacteria containing
an expressible lux gene complex under the control of a stress inducible
promoter sequence.
|
Claim 11
A kit for detecting the presence of an environmental insult comprising the
following in packaged combination:
(i) an aliquoted lyophilized biological reagent comprising;
(a) a detector cell containing a DNA fragment comprising a stress promoter gene
operably linked to the lux gene complex;
(b) a suitable buffer; and
(c) a cryoprotective reagent;
(ii) a rehydrating reagent; and
(iii) a suitable growth media.
|
Designated contracting States at the time of grant are: Austria (patent
lapsed as reported by INPADOC), Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark (patent
lapsed as reported by INPADOC), Spain (patent lapsed as reported by INPADOC),
France, United Kingdom, Greece (patent lapsed as reported by INPADOC), Ireland
(patent lapsed as reported by INPADOC), Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg (patent
lapsed as reported by EPO), Monaco, Netherlands, Portugal (patent lapsed as
reported by INPADOC), Sweden (patent lapsed as reported by INPADOC)
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult with
a detector organism containing an expressible lux gene complex under
the control of a stress inducible promoter (claim 1)
- a lyophilized biological reagent comprising a bacteria transformed with an
expressible lux gene complex under the control of a stress inducible
promoter sequence (claim 10)
- a kit for detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult
comprising a detector cell containing a DNA fragment comprising a stress
inducible promoter operably linked to the lux gene complex (claim 11)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2200702.
Comments:
There is no limit on the type of lux gene complex nor type of detector
organism in EP 793729.
|
|
US
5731163
- Earlliest priority - 23 Nov 1994
- Filed - 22 Nov 1996
- Granted - 24 March 1998
- Expected expiry - 22 Nov 2016
|
Title - Lyophilized bioluminescent bacterial reagent for the
detection of toxicants
Claim 1
A method of detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult with a
lyophilized biological reagent said reagent comprising
- a detector prokaryotic microorganism containing an expressible
luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter
sequence, the method comprising the steps of:
(i) rehydrating the lyophilized biological reagent in a suitable amount of
water wherein a baseline bioluminescence is produced;
(ii) immediately contacting the rehydrated reagent with a sample suspected of
containing an environment insult to form a reagent mixture;
(iii) incubating the mixture for at least 20 minutes and at a temperature of up
to 30° C. and;
(iv) detecting an increase in bioluminescence from the mixture.
|
Claim 6
A lyophilized biological reagent comprising
- bacteria transformed with an expressible luxCDABE gene complex
under the control of a stress inducible promoter sequence.
|
Claim 7
A kit for detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult
comprising the following in packaged combination:
(i) an aliquoted lyophilized biological reagent comprising;
(a) a detector prokaryotic microorganism cell containing a DNA fragment
comprising a stress promoter gene operably linked to a luxCDABE gene
complex;
(b) a suitable buffer; and
(c) a cryo protective reagent;
(ii) a rehydrating reagent; and
(iii) a suitable growth media.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult with
a prokaryotic microorganism containing an expressible luxCDABE gene
complex under the control of a stress inducible promoter (claim 1)
- a lyophilized biological reagent comprising bacteria transformed with an
expressible luxCDABE gene complex under the control of a stress
inducible promoter sequence (claim 6)
- a kit for detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult
comprising a prokaryotic microorganism cell containing a DNA fragment comprising
a stress inducible promoter operably linked to the luxCDABE gene
complex (claim 7)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2200702.
Comments:
US 5731163 recites the same three independent claims as those of CA 2200702,
which limits the detector organism to be a prokaryotic microorganism, and that
the reporter gene is an expressible luxCDABE gene (and not any
lux gene complex).
|
|
WO
1996/16187
- Earlliest priority - 23 Nov 1994
- Filed - 20 Nov 1995
- Published - 30 May 1996
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Lyophilized bioluminescent bacterial reagent for the
detection of toxicants
Claim 1
A method of detecting the presence of an environmental insult with a
lyophilized biological reagent said reagent comprising a detector organism
containing an expressible lux gene complex under the control of a
stress inducible promoter sequence, the method comprising the steps of:
(i) rehydrating the lyophilized biological reagent in a suitable amount of
water wherein a baseline bioluminescence is produced;
(ii) immediately contacting the rehydrated reagent with a sample suspected of
containing an environmental insult to form a reagent mixture;
(iii) incubating the mixture for at least 20 minutes and at a temperature of up
to 30˚C and;
(iv) detecting a change in bioluminescence from the mixture.
|
Claim 10
A lyophilized biological reagent comprising a transformed bacteria containing
an expressible lux gene complex under the control of a stress inducible
promoter sequence.
|
Claim 11
A kit for detecting the presence of an environmental insult comprising the
following in packaged combination:
(i) an aliquoted lyophilized biological reagent comprising;
(a) a detector cell containing a DNA fragment comprising a stress promoter
gene operably linked to the lux gene complex;
(b) a suitable buffer; and
(c) a cryoprotective reagent;
(ii) a rehydrating reagent; and
(iii) a suitable growth media.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult with
a detector organism containing an expressible lux gene complex under
the control of a stress inducible promoter (claim 1)
- a lyophilized biological reagent comprising a bacteria transformed with an
expressible lux gene complex under the control of a stress inducible
promoter sequence (claim 10)
- a kit for detecting the presence of a sublethal environmental insult
comprising a detector cell containing a DNA fragment comprising a stress
inducible promoter operably linked to the lux gene complex (claim 11)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2200702.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, the claims
above do not have enforceable rights.
|
|
Remarks
|
National phase entry of WO 1996/16187 in Japan (JP H10/509049) is deemed to
be withdrawn (notice of rejection created on 21 Oct 1999, last correspondence
recorded on 18 Nov 1999).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
08/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
US '5731163'
|
|
Results
|
1
|
|
Comments
|
This patent document was identified as a reference in the description of
US 2001/034039 - Bioluminescent organism for detecting toxic
substances
|
Patent applications filed by the University of Cincinnati
Technology overview
Dr Daniel W. Nebert at the Department of Environmental Health,
University of Cincinnati conducts research on biological aspects of of
metabolism-gene, receptor-gene and transporter-gene superfamilies, one direction
of which includes heavy metal toxicity. Dr Nebert filed a US patent application
disclosing a method to measure water contaminants using transgenic zebrafish.
Three scientific articles were published by the research team in relation to
this technology:[add a comment]
- Carvan III et al. (2000). Transgenic zebrafish as sentinels for
aquatic pollution.
Ann
N Y Acad Sci. 919:133-47.
- Carvan III et al. (2000). Activation of transcription factors in
zebrafish cell cultures by environmental pollutants.
Arch
Biochem Biophys 376: 320.
- Nebert et al. (2002). Use of reporter genes and vertebrate DNA
motifs in transgenic zebrafish as sentinels for assessing aquatic pollution.
Environ
Health Perspect. 110(1):A15. (Correspondence article in responce to
Mattingly et al. 2001; Environ. Health Perspect. 109:845-849)
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2004/147030
- Earliest priority - 22 May 2000
- Filed - 22 May 2001
- Abandoned - 2 August 2006
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Transgenic animals for monitoring water quality
|
Claim 1
A method of measuring contaminants in water comprising:
a. introducing into a transgenic zebrafish organism a DNA construct having
the sequence of at least one regulatory response element gene
operatively linked to a DNA molecule encoding at least one
reporter gene such that the at least one regulatory element of the gene controls
the expression of the at least one reporter gene;
b. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to a water sample to be tested for a time
sufficient to allow contaminants become bioconcentrated within the zebrafish;
c. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to conditions permitting expression of the
at least one reporter gene; and
d. detecting the expression of the at least one reporter gene; and
e. correlating the detected expression to known standards and thereby
determining the quantity of contaminants in the water sample.
|
Claim 2
A method of measuring contaminants in water comprising:
a. introducing into a transgenic zebrafish organism a DNA construct having
the sequence of two or more regulatory response element
genes operatively linked to a DNA molecule encoding at least
one reporter gene such that a regulatory elements of the gene
controls expression of the reporter gene;
b. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to a water sample to be tested for a time
sufficient to allow contaminants become bioconcentrated within the zebrafish
c. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to conditions permitting expression of the
reporter genes; and
d. detecting the expression of the reporter genes; and
e. correlating the detected expression to known standards and thereby
determining the quantity of contaminants in the water sample.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of measuring contaminants in water comprising transgenic zebrafish
with at least one (or more) regulatory response element gene(s) operatively
linked to a DNA molecule encoding at least one reporter gene (claim 1, 2)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- Operatively linked - a juxtaposition wherein the components so described are
in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner
- Regulatory response element gene - those sequences normally within 100 kb of
the coding region of a locus
- Reporter gene - The present invention utilizes the firefly luciferase
(luc) or green fluorescent protein (GFP)... (there is no defined
statement that limits the reporter genes to luc or GFP)
Comment:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
The description provides a table (Table 1) that introduces six
pollution-inducible response elements and their respective consensus sequences,
and an example of responses of transgenic zebrafish cell lines to substances
with the following nine different pollutant-inducible promoters linked to the
firefly luc gene (Figure 2):
1. Aromatic hydrocarbon response element (AHRE) to dioxin (10nM TCDD)
- mouse Cyp1a1
- mouse AhRDtk
- rainbow trout CYP1A3
- human CYP1A1
2. Electrophile response element (EPRE) to tBHQ (10µM)
- mouse EPREmt1
- mouse NQO1
- human NQO1
3. Metal response element (MRE) to cadmium (30µM)
- mouse MREd5mt1
- rainbow trout MT-B
|
University of Cincinnati
P.O. BOX 670829
3323 EDEN AVENUE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45267
University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property Office (UCIPO) website:
http://www.ipo.uc.edu/
'Contact Us' on the UCIPO website provides an Email-based form for licensing
interests.
|
|
US
2006/143718
- Earliest priority - 22 May 2000
- Filed - 23 November 2005
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Transgenic animals for monitoring water quality
|
Claim 1
A method of measuring contaminants in water comprising:
a. introducing into a transgenic zebrafish organism a DNA construct having
the sequence of at least one regulatory response element gene operatively linked
to a DNA molecule encoding at least one reporter gene such that the at least one
regulatory element of the gene controls the expression of the at least one
reporter gene;
b. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to a water sample to be tested for a time
sufficient to allow contaminants become bioconcentrated within the zebrafish;
c. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to conditions permitting expression of the
at least one reporter gene; and
d. detecting the expression of the at least one reporter gene; and
e. correlating the detected expression to known standards and thereby
determining the quantity of contaminants in the water sample.
|
Claim 2
A method of measuring contaminants in water comprising:
a. introducing into a transgenic zebrafish organism a DNA construct having
the sequence of two or more regulatory response element genes operatively linked
to a DNA molecule encoding at least one reporter gene such that a regulatory
elements of the gene controls expression of the reporter gene;
b. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to a water sample to be tested for a time
sufficient to allow contaminants become bioconcentrated within the zebrafish
c. exposing the transgenic zebrafish to conditions permitting expression of the
reporter genes; and
d. detecting the expression of the reporter genes; and
e. correlating the detected expression to known standards and thereby
determining the quantity of contaminants in the water sample.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of measuring contaminants in water comprising transgenic zebrafish
with at least one (or more) regulatory response element gene(s) operatively
linked to a DNA molecule encoding at least one reporter gene (claim 1, 2)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in US 2004/147030
(see above).
Comments:
This application is a continuation of now abandoned US 2004/147030.
|
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
13 Sept 2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biomonitor and zebrafish
|
|
Results
|
2
|
|
Comments
|
|
Patent application filed by Greenovation Biotech GmbH
Technology overview
Greenovation Biotech GmbH is a private company based in Freiburg,
Germany, which conducts R&D in the field of biotechnology. Dr Michael
Schledz studied the application of hpd (gene coding for
p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid dioxygenase, HPD) as an alternative reporter gene
for a biosensor system in Escherichia coli and yeast
(Saccharomyces cervisiae), the technology of which is disclosed in the
application below. HPD catalyzes metabolism of p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid
into homogentistic acid, which, upon oxydation forms ochronotic acid, resulting
in a detectable brown pigmentation.[add a comment]
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
WO
2002/053772
- Earliest priority - 28 Dec 2000
- Filed - 15 Nov 2001
- Published - 11 Jul 2002
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Novel biosensor system
|
Claim 1
Biosensor system comprising
- a cell or organism harbouring a DNA molecule enabling said
cell or organism to express p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid dioxygenase under the
control of a promotor which is inducible by the presence of substances or
conditions to be analyzed.
|
|
Claim 10
An isolated DNA molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence providing an
expression cassette capable of directing the expression of
p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid dioxygenase, wherein said expression cassette
comprises from 5' to 3':
(a) an inducible promoter capable of expressing a downstream coding sequence;
(b) a DNA sequence coding for the expression of p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid
dioxygenase; and
(c) a 3' termination sequence,
characterized in that the inducible promoter (a) is selected from the group
consisting of zntA, cadA, merA, nic,
chr, ars, fliC, corA, dmpR,
xylR, xylS, pqiAB, SoxRS, zrt,
zip, ycfl, cup1-1, cup1-2, gefl,
ftr1, hal1, gre1, and aad4.
|
|
Claim 16
Process for studying and/or monitoring the activity of a promoter or functional
part thereof by the steps of using of
- a vector which comprises a DNA sequence coding for the expression of
p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid dioxygenase under the control of said promoter or
functional part thereof and
- a transcriptional terminator, wherein
the DNA sequence is, for the transformation of a host cell or organism,
cultivating the transformants and monitoring the activity of said promoter or
functional part thereof by measuring the content of ochronotic pigment
accumulated in the culture medium.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a biosensor system comprising a cell or organism harbouring a DNA molecule
that can express p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid dioxygenase (claim 1)
- an isolated DNA molecule comprising an expression cassette comprising an
inducible promoter, a DNA sequence coding for the expression of
p-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvic acid dioxygenase, and a 3' termination sequence (claim
10)
- a process for studying and/or monitoring the activity of a promoter or
functional part thereof (claim 16)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Cell or organism - There is no definition for this term. Dependent claim 6
recites the cell or organism to be prokaryotic or eukaryotic, with subsequent
claims 7, 8, and 9 reciting use of Escherichia coli, yeast, and
Saccharomyces cervisiae, respectively.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
The specification provides examples of the following constructs and
transformed organisms:
|
Induction substance
|
Promoter gene
|
Reporter gene
|
Transformed organism
|
|
Zinc
|
E. coli zntA
|
Arabidopsis hpd
|
E. coli TOP10
|
|
Zinc
|
E. coli zntA
|
Synechocystis hpd
|
E. coli Bl21(DE3)RIL
|
|
Copper
|
S. cerevisiae CUP1-2
|
Arabidopsis hpd
|
S. cerevisiae INVSc1
|
|
Zinc
|
E. coli zntA |
E. coli ßgal
|
E. coli
TOP10
|
|
Greenovation Biotech GMBH
Boetzinger Str. 29 b
D-79111 Freiburg
Ph +49-761-470-99-0
Fax +49-761-470-99-190
Email info@greenovation.com
|
| Remarks |
There is no information on this PCT application entering national phase in
any jurisdiction by the end of the 30/31 month deadline from filing (which was
15 May/Jun 2004), as indicated by lack of INPADOC patent families and
information on national phase entry on the WIPO Intellectual Property Digital
Library (IPDL).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
01/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
Greenovation in inventor
|
|
Results
|
16
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 16 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on the abstract and a review of
claims.
|
Patent applications filed by The University of Tennessee Research
Corporation
Technology overview
The patent family described in this section was filed by a
research team lead by Dr John Sanseverino and Dr Gary S. Sayler at the Center
for Environmental Biotechnology at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. They
have identified a method to detect the presence of divalent mercury by
transforming E. coli and P. fluorescens with the
operator/promoter (o/p) region of merR (merRo/p) fused to
luxCDABE using a transposable element to integrate the fusion gene into
the bacterial genome. They have also investigated the use of a support matrix
and an encapsulating material for the transgenic bacterium to provide a
user-friendly detection kit for mercury, and disclosed the technology. A
related scientific presentation was held by the research group in 2001 -
Carrasquillo CI, Tomaszewski A, Sanseverino J, Sayler GS (2001). Development of
a handheld device for the detection of divalent mercury in water using a
genetically engineered reporter microorganism. Society for the Advancement of
Chicanos and Native Americans in Science. 27-30 Sept, Phoenix, Arizona.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
CA 2419481
- Earliest priority - 14 Aug 2000
- Filed - 10 Aug 2001
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent methods for direct visual detection
of environmental compounds
Claim 1
A device for detecting a selected analyte, comprising:
- a stably transformed bacterium containing a promoterless lux gene
cassette having a regulatory element for a selected analyte inserted in front of
the lux gene cassette;
- a support matrix onto which the bacterium is attached; and
- an encapsulating material to contain said bacterium attached to the support
matrix wherein the encapsulated bacterium emits visibly detectable light in the
presence of the selected analyte.
|
Claim 13
A genetically modified bacterium responsive to divalent mercury, said
bacterium containing a merRo/p-lux gene stably integrated into the
bacterial chromosome wherein said bacterium produces a bioluminescent protein in
the presence of divalent mercury.
|
Claim 25
A method for detecting mercury comprising
- contacting a sample suspected of containing mercury II ion with a
bioreporter bacterium genetically modified to contain a merRo/pA-lux
gene; and
- detecting the presence of the mercury ion when a visibly detectable
luminescence is produced.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a device for detecting a selected analyte comprising a bacterium containing
a promoterless lux gene cassette having a regulatory element for a
selected analyte inserted in front of the lux gene cassette (claim 1)
- a genetically modified bacterium responsive to divalent mercury (claim 13)
- a method for detecting mercury comprising contacting a sample with a
bioreporter bacterium genetically modified to contain a merRo/p-lux
gene (claim 25)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 2002/14551.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
University of Tennessee Research Corporation
1534 WHITE AVENUE
SUITE 403
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37996
Ph: +1-865-974-1882
Email: vhunley@tennessee.edu
|
|
US
2003/108980
- Earliest priority - 14 Aug 2000
- Filed - 8 Aug 2001
- Application abandoned - 15 Mar 2006
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent methods for direct visual detection
of environmental compounds
Claim 1
A device for detecting a selected analyte, comprising:
a stably transformed bacterium containing a promoterless lux gene
cassette having a regulatory element for a selected analyte inserted in front of
the lux gene cassette;
a support matrix onto which the bacterium is attached; and
an encapsulating material to contain said bacterium attached to the support
matrix wherein the encapsulated bacterium emits visibly detectable light in the
presence of the selected analyte.
|
Claim 13
A genetically modified bacterium responsive to divalent mercury, said
bacterium containing a merRo/p-lux gene stably integrated into the
bacterial chromosome wherein said bacterium produces a bioluminescent protein in
the presence of divalent mercury.
|
Claim 25
A method for detecting mercury comprising
- contacting a sample suspected of containing mercury II ion with a
bioreporter bacterium genetically modified to contain a merRo/pA-lux
gene; and detecting the presence of the mercury ion when a visibly detectable
luminescence is produced.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a device for detecting a selected analyte comprising a bacterium containing
a promoterless lux gene cassette having a regulatory element for a
selected analyte inserted in front of the lux gene cassette (claim 1)
- a genetically modified bacterium responsive to divalent mercury (claim 13)
- a method for detecting mercury comprising contacting a sample with a
bioreporter bacterium genetically modified to contain a merRo/p-lux gene (claim
25)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 2002/14551.
Comments:
This application has been abandoned due to failure of the applicant to
respond to an office action.
Because it is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
|
WO
2002/14551
- Earliest priority - 14 Aug 2000
- Filed - 10 Aug 2001
- Published - 21 Feb 2002
- Amended claims - 26 Jun 2003
|
Title - Bioluminescent methods for direct visual detection
of environmental compounds
Claim 1
A portable system for detecting a selected analyte, comprising:
- a stably transformed bacterium containing a promoterless
lux gene cassette having a regulatory element for a
selected analyte inserted in front of the lux gene cassette;
- a support matrix onto which the bacterium is attached ;
- an encapsulating material to contain said bacterium attached to the support
matrix, wherein the encapsulated bacterium emits visibly detectable light in the
presence of the selected analyte, and
- a portable detection device.
|
Claim 13
A genetically modified bacterium responsive to divalent mercury, said
bacterium being encapsulated and containing a gene stably integrated into
bacterial chromosome, wherein said bacterium produces a bioluminescent protein
in the presence of divalent mercury.
|
Claim 22
A mobile method for detecting mercury in water samples comprising
- providing a plurality of stably transformed bioreporter bacterium
genetically modified to contain a merRo/p-lux gene, said bacterium
attached to a support matrix and disposed within protective packaging for
preserving hydration of said bacterium;
- removing said protective packaging;
- contacting a water comprising sample suspected of containing mercury II ion
with said detecting the presence of the mercury ion when a visibly detectable
luminescence is produced, said detecting using a portable detection device.
|
Note: The three independent claims extracted above are those of the amended
claims.
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a portable system for detecting a selected analyte comprising a bacterium
containing a promoterless lux gene cassette having a regulatory element
for a selected analyte inserted in front of the lux gene cassette
(claim 1)
- a genetically modified bacterium responsive to divalent mercury (claim 13)
- a mobile method for detecting mercury in water samples comprising providing
a bioreporter bacterium genetically modified to contain a merRo/p-lux gene
(claim 22)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Bioreporter - intact, living microbial cells that have been genetically
engineered to produce a measurable signal in response to a specific chemical or
physical agent in their environment.
-
lux gene cassette - this term is not defined in the specification.
The preferred embodiment is provided as follows: '...the cassette may be
merRo/p-lux where the lux gene comprises CDABE.'
- Analyte - this term is not defined in the specification. Dependent claims 4
and 5 recite the following analytes: naphthalene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 13-phenylethylamine, phenol, biphenyl, and
mercury.
- Bacterium - the following statement indicates that there is no limit on the
bacterial species that can be used for this invention: 'While the invention has
been illustrated with E. coli and P. fluorescens, other
bacteria can be used.'
- Support matrix - this term is not defined in the specification. Dependent
claim 17 recite the following matrices: cellulose, glass, colloidal noble metal,
plastic, laminin or resin.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
Examples in the specification have described the enablement of the technology
by:
- Creating a merRo/p::lux bioreporter - merRo/p (Genbank
Accession AF071413; nucleotides 19133-19638) was fused to luxCDABE on
pFSP3, the mer-lux reporter transposon was excised to create a transposome,
which was then electroporated into E. coli EC 100 competent cells.
Three transformants gave bioluminescence in response to Hg++, one of
which had twice luminescence intensity compared to the other two strains.
- Immobilising the bioreporter - toxity testing of latex material and
bioluminescence of immobilised bioreporters were designed with P.
fluorescens 5RL (naphthalene detection). A simulated bioluminescene test
with bioreporters immobilised in Noble agar onto a layer of silicone plastic
was conducted with several bioreporter strains, including that of E.
coli EC 100 containing merRo/p::lux.
|
| Remarks |
- WO 2002/14551 has entered national phase in the United States, which has not
yet been published.
- National phase entry of WO 2002/14451 in Australia (AU 2001/86427) lapsed on
10 Jan 2004.
- National phase entry of WO 2002/14451 in Europe (EP 1315836) is pending.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
14/09/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
bioreporter and (Sayler in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
27
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 27 results identified using these search terms, 4 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed and patents owned by Eastman Chemical
Company
Technology overview
Eastman Chemical Company (headquarters located in Tennessee, US)
was established in 1920 by George Eastman, who started supplying photography
chemicals to Kodak. They have expanded business throughout the years and
currently provides chemicals, fibers and plastics for use in consumer products.
The patent documents described in this section filed by Eastman Chemical Co.
discloses a reporter bacterium isolated from a biological sludge that is
transformed with a reporter gene that is not naturally found in the bacterium.
Presence of toxic conditions in biological sludges are detected with decreasing
reporter signal from these transgenic bacterium upon exposure to the toxic
condition. This research was conducted by a PhD candidate (now Dr) Christine J
Kelly at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, under support from the Eastman
Chemical Company. Dr Kelly isolated a Pseudomonas sp. strain Shk 1
(16rDNA accession AF042858) that was transformed with pUTK2 (Burlage et
al. (1990). Comparative genetic organization of incompatibility group P
degradative plasmids.
J
Bacteriol. 172:6818) containing the Tn4431 lux transposon via
mating with E. coli harbouring the plasmid. This research was
published in Kelly et al. (1999). Bioluminescent reporter bacterium
for toxicity monitoring in biological wastewater treatment systems. Water
Environ Res. 71:31-35.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
CA 2287940
- Earliest priority - 1 May 1997
- Filed - 29 Apr 1998
- Application lapsed - 17 Mar 2004
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent reporter bacterium and methods for
toxicity monitoring in biological wastewater treatment systems
Claim 1
A reporter bacterium, comprising
- a bacterium that occurs naturally in a biological
sludge and that contains a nucleic acid that encodes a
reporter protein not found in the naturally occurring
bacterium.
|
Claim 8
A bioluminescent reporter bacterium, obtained by the process comprising:
- contacting a bacteria-containing sample of a biological sludge with a donor
bacterium, wherein
the donor bacterium contains a nucleic acid that encodes a
bioluminescent reporter protein that does not naturally occur in biological
sludge bacteria under conditions whereby mating can occur.
|
Claim 12
A bioluminescent reporter bacterium, obtained by the process comprising:
- delivering to an isolated bacterium, that occurs naturally in a biological
sludge, a nucleic acid construct which contains a nucleic acid that encodes a
bioluminescent reporter protein that does not occur naturally in the bacterium,
under conditions whereby the nucleic acid encoding the bioluminescent reporter
protein is taken up by a bacterium in the sludge sample.
|
Claim 15
A method for making a bioluminescent reporter bacterium, comprising:
- contacting a bacteria-containing sample of a biological sludge with a
bacterium that contains a nucleic acid that encodes a bioluminescent reporter
protein that does not naturally occur in biological sludge bacteria, under
conditions whereby the nucleic acid encoding the reporter protein is taken up by
a bacterium in the sludge sample.
|
Claim 16
A method for making a bioluminescent reporter bacterium, comprising:
- delivering to an isolated bacterium, that occurs naturally in a biological
sludge, a nucleic acid construct which contains a nucleic acid that encodes a
bioluminescent reporter protein that does not occur naturally in the bacterium,
under conditions whereby the nucleic acid encoding the reporter protein is taken
up by the isolated sludge bacterium.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a reporter bacterium that occurs naturally in a biological sludge and
contains a nucleic acid that encodes a reporter protein not found in the
naturally occurring bacterium (claim 1)
- a bioluminescent reporter bacterium (claim 8, 12)
- a method for making a bioluminescent reporter bacterium (claim 15, 16)
Definitions extracted from the claims are:
- Biological sludge - includes sludges from wastewater treatment facilities
(e.g., industrial, municipal, etc.) and is also commonly referred to as
biosolids and wastewater solids.
- Bacterium - can be any bacteria which do not naturally contain a
bioluminescent reporter gene, and in a preferred embodiment are those bacteria
which occur naturally in a biological sludge.
- Donor bacterium - can be selected from among the bacteria used as donors in
other contexts, for example, Escherichia coli, Alcaligenes
eutrophus and Pseudomonas putida, although, theoretically, almost
all known bacteria could serve as donors.
- Reporter protein - can describe one protein that is sufficient to produce
the signal, or more than one protein, which when expressed sequentially or
simultaneously or with some temporal overlap, produces the signal.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
Eastman Chemical Co.
P.O. BOX 511
KINGSPORT, TENNESSEE 37662
Licensing information:
Eastman Chemical Company
Technology Licensing and Alliances
P.O. Box 431, Bldg 280
Kingsport, TN 37662
Ph 800-Eastman(800-327-8626), Ext. 6076
Fax +1-423-229-2811
Email licensing@eastman.com
|
|
US
6110661
- Earliest priority - 1 May 1997
- Filed - 2 Oct 1997
- Granted - 29 Aug 2000
- Expected expiry - 2 Oct 2017
|
Title - Bioluminescent reporter bacterium
Claim 1
A method of making and using bioluminescent reporter bacteria, the method
comprising the following steps:
a) obtaining bacteria from biological wastewater sludge of a wastewater
treatment facility;
b) introducing into said bacteria a nucleic acid construct that encodes a
bioluminescent reporter protein under conditions whereby the nucleic acid
encoding the bioluminescent reporter protein is taken up by, and expressed in,
said bacteria, and wherein the bioluminescent reporter protein does not
naturally occur in said bacteria;
c) contacting the influent from the wastewater treatment facility with the
bioluminescent reporter bacteria obtained by steps a) and b);
d) detecting the bioluminescent reporter protein expressed by the bioluminescent
reporter bacteria; and
e) correlating the presence of toxicity with the reduction in expression of the
bioluminescent reporter protein;
wherein the bioluminescent reporter bacteria are made from bacteria obtained
from the same wastewater treatment facility at which the bioluminescent reporter
bacteria are to be used for detecting toxicity, and are therefore specifically
adapted to the conditions of said wastewater treatment facility.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a method of making and using bioluminescent reporter bacteria (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in CA 2287940.
Comments:
Independent claim 1 (which is the only independent claim in granted US
6110661) is a method claim using the bioluminescent reporter bacterium, as
opposed to the PCT application and the subsequent national phase entries that
contain claims that are generally directed towards the bioluminescent reporter
bacterium (see below for PCT application WO 1998/49337, note that applications
do not have enforceable rights until they are granted). Therefore the scope of
granted US 6110661 is relatively narrow in comparison to the other patent
applications described in this section.
|
|
WO
1998/49337
- Earliest priority - 1 May 1997
- Filed - 29 Apr 1998
- Published - 5 Nov 1998
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Bioluminescent reporter bacterium and methods for
toxicity monitoring in biological wastewater treatment systems
Claim 1
A reporter bacterium, comprising
- a bacterium that occurs naturally in a biological sludge and that contains a
nucleic acid that encodes a reporter protein not found in the naturally
occurring bacterium.
|
Claim 8
A bioluminescent reporter bacterium, obtained by the process comprising:
- contacting a bacteria-containing sample of a biological sludge with a donor
bacterium, wherein
the donor bacterium contains a nucleic acid that encodes a bioluminescent
reporter protein that does not naturally occur in biological sludge bacteria
under conditions whereby mating can occur.
|
Claim 12
A bioluminescent reporter bacterium, obtained by the process comprising:
- delivering to an isolated bacterium, that occurs naturally in a biological
sludge, a nucleic acid construct which contains a nucleic acid that encodes a
bioluminescent reporter protein that does not occur naturally in the bacterium,
under conditions whereby the nucleic acid encoding the bioluminescent reporter
protein is taken up by a bacterium in the sludge sample.
|
Claim 15
A method for making a bioluminescent reporter bacterium, comprising:
- contacting a bacteria-containing sample of a biological sludge with a
bacterium that contains a nucleic acid that encodes a bioluminescent reporter
protein that does not naturally occur in biological sludge bacteria, under
conditions whereby the nucleic acid encoding the reporter protein is taken up by
a bacterium in the sludge sample.
|
Claim 16
A method for making a bioluminescent reporter bacterium, comprising:
- delivering to an isolated bacterium, that occurs naturally in a biological
sludge, a nucleic acid construct which contains a nucleic acid that encodes a
bioluminescent reporter protein that does not occur naturally in the bacterium,
under conditions whereby the nucleic acid encoding the reporter protein is taken
up by the isolated sludge bacterium.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a reporter bacterium that occurs naturally in a biological sludge and
contains a nucleic acid that encodes a reporter protein not found in the
naturally occurring bacterium (claim 1)
- a bioluminescent reporter bacterium (claim 8, 12)
- a method for making a bioluminescent reporter bacterium (claim 15, 16)
Definitions extracted from the claims are provided in CA 2287940.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
|
Remarks
|
- National phase entry of WO 1998/49337 in Japan (JP 2002500510) is deemed to
be withdrawn on 26 Jul 2005.
- National phase entryof WO 1998/49337 in Australia (AU 72646/98) has lapsed
on 13 Jul 2000.
- National phase entry of WO 1998/49937 in Europe (EP 979299) is deemed to be
withdrawn on 30 Mar 2005.
- Other national phase entries of WO 1998/49337 include Brazil (BR 9809325),
China (CN 1254382), Indonesia (ID 22801), South Africa (ZA 9803668).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
02/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
bioreporter
|
|
Results
|
68
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 68 results identified using these search terms, 6 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed and patents owned by VITO 3
Technology overview
VITO (Vlaamse instelling voor technologisch onderzoek, Flemish
Institute for Technological Research) is a research organization in Belgium with
a focus on contract research in the fields of energy, environment and materials
technology. A research team lead by Dr Luc PE Verschaeve has identified a
method to enhance detection of genotoxic compounds by introducing a second
'control' transgenic microorganism along with the first transgenic microorganism
that contains a stress-inducible promoter linked to a reporter gene. The second
transgenic microorganism contains a constitutive promoter linked to the same
reporter gene as that of the first microorganism, which provides a background
signal that can be used to adjust the signal from the first transgenic
microorganism.[add a comment]
VITO has registered a genotoxicity test that uses this technology
(and WO 1997/41251; see chapter 5 Detection of metal and other
toxic compounds), which is called VITOTOX, containing two S.
typhimuruim strains; one transformed with E. coli recN2-4 (recN
promoter up mutation) and the other with a constitutive promoter with the sigma
70 consensus sequence, both promoters of which are linked to
luxCDABE. The related journal article of this technology is Verschaeve
et al. (1999). VITOTOX bacterial genotoxicity and toxicity test for
the rapid screening of chemicals.
Environ.
Mol. Mutagen. 33(3):240-8.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
CA 2290354
- Earliest priority - 14 Apr 1998
- Filed - 12 Apr 1999
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Diagnostic systems and method for determining the
presence of a genotoxic and/or toxic compound in a sample
Claim 1
A diagnostic system made of:
- a transformed micro-organism capable of an increased reporter activity upon
exposure to an environmental insult, said micro-organism having a stress
inducible promoter sequence being operatively linked to a reporter encoding
nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that
can be assayed, and of
- a transformed micro-organism having a constitutive and non stress inducible
promoter sequence being operatively linked to a reporter encoding nucleic acid
sequence encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that can be assayed.
|
Claim 12
Method for determining the kinetics of genotoxicity of a compound into a
sample, wherein the measuring of luminescence of both inducible and constitutive
transformed micro-organisms occurs at multiple points in time, preferably
continuously, and in addition carrying out the step of determining the
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for the transformed micro-organisms at said point
and time, dividing the S/N ratio of the inducible micro-organism by teat of the
constitutive micro-organisms and plotting these data, said plotting representing
the corrected kinetics ef genotoxicity of the genotoxic compound in the sample.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a diagnostic system made of two transformed microorganisms , one with a
stress inducible promoter and another with a constitutive and non-stress
inducible promoter operably linked to a reporter (claim 1)
- a method for determining the kinetics of genotoxicity of a compound into a
sample (claim 12)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in US 6472152.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
VITO
BOERETANG 200
B-2400
MOL BELGIUM
Ph + 32 14 33 55 11
Fax + 32 14 33 55 99
vito@vito.be
|
EP 950717
- Earliest priority - 14 Apr 1998
- Filed - 14 Apr 1998
- Application deemed to be withdawn - 25 Oct 2000
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Diagnostic systems and method for determining the
presence of a genotoxic and/or toxic compound in a sample
Claim 1
A diagnostic system made of :
a transformed micro-organism capable of an increased reporter activity upon
exposure to an environmental insult, said micro-organism having a stress
inducible promoter sequence being operatively linked to a reporter encoding
nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that
can be assayed, and of
a transformed micro-organism having a constitutive and non stress inducible
promoter sequence being operatively linked to a reporter encoding nucleic acid
sequence encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that can be assayed.
|
Claim 12
Method for determining the kinetics of genotoxicity of a compound into a
sample, wherein the measuring of luminescence of both inducible and constitutive
transformed micro-organisms occurs at multiple points in time, preferably
continuously, and in addition carrying out the step of determining the
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for the transformed micro-organisms at said point
and time, dividing the S/N ratio of the inducible micro-organism by that of the
constitutive micro-organisms and plotting these data, said plotting representing
the corrected kinetics of genotoxicity of the genotoxic compound in the sample.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a diagnostic system made of two transformed microorganisms , one with a
stress inducible promoter and another with a constitutive and non-stress
inducible promoter operably linked to a reporter (claim 1)
- a method for determining the kinetics of genotoxicity of a compound into a
sample (claim 12)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in US 6472152.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
|
US
6472152
- Earliest priority - 14 Apr 1998
- Filed - 12 Apr 1999
- Granted - 29 Oct 2002
- Expected expiry - 12 Apr 2019
|
Title - Diagnostic systems and method for determining the
presence of a genotoxic and/or toxic compound in a sample
Claim 1
A diagnostic system comprising:
- a first transformed micro-organism capable of an increased reporter activity
upon exposure to an environmental insult, said micro-organism
having a stress inducible promoter sequence being operatively
linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter molecule
resulting in a signal that can be assayed, and
- a second transformed micro-organism having a constitutive and non-stress
inducible promoter sequence being operatively linked to a nucleic acid sequence
encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that can be assayed, wherein
said second and first microorganisms are Salmonella typhimurium
microorganisms selected from the group consisting of
- Ames test micro-organism, micro-organism designated by deposit number LMG
P-18318, transformed TA98, transformed TA100, transformed TA102, transformed
TA104, transformed TA1538, transformed TA7001 to transformed TA7005, and
transformed TA7041 to transformed TA7046,
said micro-organisms being suitable to cooperatively detect said
environmental insult while eliminating false positive and false negative result.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a diagnostic system comprising two transformed S. typhimurium
strains, one with a stress inducible promoter and another with a constitutive
and non-stress inducible promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a
reporter molecule (claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- Environmental insult - this term is not defined in the specification.
Dependent claim 7 recites this term as 'the presence of a genotoxic and/or a
toxic compound in a sample'
- Stress inducible promoter - this term is not defined in the specification.
Examples of promoters are provided in the following statement: 'Advantageously,
the stress inducible promoter sequence in the transformed bioluminescent
micro-organism of the diagnostic system according to the invention is selected
from the group consisting of groEL, dnaK, grpE, phoA, glnA, lon, lysU, rpoD,
clpB, clpP, uspA, katG, uvrA, frda, micF, fabA, lac, his, sodA, sodB, soi-28,
recA, xthA, narG, recF, recj, recN, recO, recQ, ruv, uvrD, ars, cad, mer,
pco, and sfiA.'
- Reporter - this term is not defined in the specification. Examples of
reporters are provided in the following statement: 'Preferably, both transformed
micro-organisms are bioluminescent micro-organisms and the signal can be assayed
as light production. Other possibilities are the peroxydase, alkaline
phosphatase, β-gal and gus genetic sequence...'
- LMG P-18318 - "pr1" strain, which is a transgenic S. typhimurium TA104
containing a constitutive promoter and luxCDABE
Comments:
Independent claim 1 of US 6472152 is relatively narrow in comparison to the
other patent applications presented in this section (note: US 6472152 is the
only granted patent presented in this section) in terms of the microorganism
that can be used, which is limited to particular strains of S.
typhimurium.
|
|
WO
1999/53092
- Earliest priority - 14 Apr 1998
- Filed - 12 Apr 1999
- Published - 21 Oct 1999
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Diagnostic systems and method for determining the
presence of a genotoxic and/or toxic compound in a sample
Claim 1
A diagnostic system made of
- a transformed micro-organism capable of an increased reporter activity upon
exposure to an environmental insult, said micro-organism having a stress
inducible promoter sequence being operatively linked to a reporter encoding
nucleic acid sequence encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that
can be assayed, and of
- a transformed micro-organism having a constitutive and non stress inducible
promoter sequence being operatively linked to a reporter encoding nucleic acid
sequence encoding a reporter molecule resulting in a signal that can be assayed.
|
Claim 12
Method for determining the kinetics of genotoxicity of a compound into a
sample, wherein the measuring of luminescence of both inducible and constitutive
transformed micro-organisms occurs at multiple points in time, preferably
continuously, and in addition carrying out the step of determining the
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for the transformed micro-organisms at said point
and time, dividing the S/N ratio of the inducible micro-organism by that of the
constitutive micro-organisms and plotting these data, said plotting representing
the corrected kinetics of genotoxicity of the genotoxic compound in the sample.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a diagnostic system made of two transformed microorganisms , one with a
stress inducible promoter and another with a constitutive and non-stress
inducible promoter operably linked to a reporter (claim 1)
- a method for determining the kinetics of genotoxicity of a compound into a
sample (claim 12)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in US 6472152.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
| Remarks |
- National phase entry of WO 1999/53092 in China (CN 1227367) was granted on
16 Nov 2005.
- National phase entry of WO 1999/53092 in Europe (EP 977896) and Japan (JP
2002/509446) are pending.
- National phase entry of WO 1999/53092 in Australia (AU 36944/99) has lapsed
on 22 May 2003.
- Other national phase entry of WO 1999/53092 includes Brazil (BR 9906356).
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
17/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
VITO in applicant
|
|
Results
|
3
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 3 results identified using these search terms, 3 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Appendix
Summary
The appendix contains patent documents that have been analysed,
but are not within the scope of this technology landscape. These patent
documents are relevant to the subject of bioindicator systems because of their
utility (use of reporter genes in bioindicators, or polypeptides coding for
enzymes that can be used in a biosensor system), however, the claims are not
directly drawn towards bioindicators, or methods/devices to detect substances or
environmental conditions, therefore were added in this section.[add a comment]
Patent application filed and patent owned by Toyobo Co. Ltd
Technology overview
A family of US patent documents described in this section
discloses the nucleic acid and amino acid sequence of two luciferases (green
light-emitting and red light-emitting) from Phrixothrix species. One
of the utilities listed in the description of these patent documents is the use
of these luciferases as a reporter in a biosensor system, where the genes can be
operatively linked to an inducible promoter. The assignee is Toyo Boseki Co.
(known as Toyobo). Toyobo Co. Ltd was founded in 1882 as a cotton spinning
company, which later expanded business and currently has three main business
sectors in fiber and textile, plastic products, and bio, medical and functional
materials.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
6962986
- Earliest priority - 1 Sept 1999
- Filed - 14 Nov 2001
- Granted - 8 Nov 2005
- Expected expiry - 1 Sept 2019
|
Title - Nucleic acid molecules encoding red and green
emitting luciferases
Claim 1
An isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a green light emitting luciferase
selected from the group consisting of:
a) a nucleic acid molecule comprising SEQ ID NO:1; and
b) a nucleic acid molecule that hybridizes to SEQ ID NO:1 under high
stringency conditions comprising washing in a solution containing
0.1×SSC/0.1% SDS for 15 min at 68° C.; or
a nucleic acid molecule that is 100% complementary to (a) or (b)
wherein the encoded green light emitting luciferase emits green bioluminescence
having a maximum lambda of approximately 549 nm when expressed in E
coli.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a green light emitting luciferase
(claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SEQ ID NO:1 - nucleotide sequence coding for Phrixothrix vivianii
luciferase
- high stringency conditions - explained on pages 2.10.1-2.10.16 and pages
6.3.1-6 in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. et al.,
“Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, John Wiley & Sons, (1998)) the
teachings of which are hereby incorporated by reference
Comments:
This granted patent is a continuation of US 09/516958 (abandoned), which is a
continuation-in-part of US 09/388290 (abandoned)
|
Toyobo Co. Ltd
2-8, DOJIMA HAMA 2-CHOME, KITA-KU
OSAKA-SHI, OSAKA-FU, JAPAN
Ph +81-6-6348-3111
Fax +81-6-6348-3206
Company website:
http://www.toyobo.co.jp/e/index.htm
The R&D site has a web-based form for enquiries concerning Toyobo
technology.
|
|
US
2002/119542
- Earliest priority - 1 Sept 1999
- Filed - 14 Nov 2001
- Granted as US 6962986 (see above)
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Nucleic acid molecules encoding red and green
emitting luciferases
Claim 1
An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence selected
from the group consisting:
a) SEQ ID NO: 1;
b) the complement of SEQ ID NO: 1;
c) nucleic acid molecule which is greater than about 90 percent identical to
the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the complement of SEQ ID NO: 1;
d) nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide having the amino acid sequence of
SEQ ID NO: 3; and
e) nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence which is
greater than about 93 percent identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:
3.
|
Claim 3
An isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a luciferase which hybridizes
under high stringency conditions to a nucleotide sequence
selected from the group consisting:
a) SEQ ID NO: 1; and
b) the complement of SEQ ID NO: 1.
|
Claim 5
An isolated nucleic acid molecule contained in deposit
pB1-PvGR .
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence coding
for Phrixothrix vivianii luciferase (claim 1, 3)
- an isolated nucleic acid molecule contained in pB1-PvGR (claim 5)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SEQ ID NO:1 - nucleotide sequence of the green light emitting luciferase
cDNA of Phrixothrix vivianii
- SEQ ID NO:2 - deduced amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1
- SEQ ID NO:3 - nucleotide sequence of the red light emitting luciferase cDNA
of Phrixothrix hirtus
- SEQ ID NO:4 - deduced amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:3
- pB1-PvGR - there is no definition for this plasmid. Accoding to Viviani
et al. (Biochem. 1999, 38: 8271-8279), this plasmid is pB1 containing a
0.75 kb EcoRV/BamH1 fragment of the green light emitting luciferase cDNA of
Phrixothrix vivianii
- high stringency conditions - explained on pages 2.10.1-2.10.16 and pages
6.3.1-6 in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. et al.,
“Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, John Wiley & Sons, (1998)) the
teachings of which are hereby incorporated by reference
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
Term 'SEQ ID NO:3' in claim 1 is most probably a misprinting of 'SEQ ID
NO:2', as the latter is the deduced amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, whereas
SEQ ID NO:3 is a nucleotide sequence of a luciferase cDNA of another
Phrixothrix species, and not an amino acid sequence (see definitions of
terms above).
|
|
US
2005/089964
- Earliest priority - 1 Sept 1999
- Filed - 14 Nov 2001
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Nucleic acid molecules encoding red and green
emitting luciferases
Claim 1
An isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a red light emitting luciferase
which hybridizes under high stringency conditions to a nucleotide sequence
selected from the group consisting of:
(a) SEQ ID NO.3, and
(b) the complement of SEQ ID No.3,
wherein said high stringency conditions correspond to washing in prewarmed (68°
C.) solution containing 0.1×SSC/0.1% SDS for 15 min at 68° C.,
wherein the encoded red light emitting luciferase emits red bioluminescence
having a maximum lambda of approximately 622 nm when expressed in E
coli.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a red light emitting luciferase
(claim 1)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SEQ ID NO:3 - nucleotide sequence of the red light emitting luciferase cDNA
of Phrixothrix hirtus
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
This application is a division of now granted US 6962986.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
01/05/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biosensor (Toyo in applicant)
|
|
Results
|
7
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 7 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on the abstract and a review of
the claims.
|
Patent applications filed by the University of Tennessee Research
Foundation
Technology overview
A research team lead by Dr Gary S. Sayler at the Center for
Environmental Biotechnology at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville
investigated codon optimization of luxA and luxB from
Photorhabdus luminsecens for expression in mammalian cells, and filed
patent applications based on their findings. They have also published this
research in a scientific journal after filing of the PCT application: Patterson
et al. (2005). Codon optimization of bacterial luciferase
(lux) for expression in mammalian
cells.
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 32(3):115-23.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2004/142356
- Earliest priority - 30 Oct 2002
- Filed - 30 Oct 2003
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Modified luciferase nucleic acids and methods of use
Claim 1
A nucleic acid comprising a codon-optimized nucleotide
sequence encoding a component of a bacterial luciferase
system.
|
Claim 9
A cell comprising a nucleic acid comprising a
codon-optimized nucleotide sequence encoding a component of a bacterial
luciferase system.
|
Claim 19
A method comprising the step of introducing into a mammalian cell a nucleic
acid comprising a codon-optimized nucleotide-sequence encoding a component of a
bacterial luciferase system.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a nucleic acid comprising a codon-optimized bacterial luciferase system
(claim 1)
- a cell comprising a codon-optimized bacterial luciferase system (claim 9)
- a method comprising introducing a codon-optimized bacterial luciferase
system into a mammalian cell (claim 19)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- Codon-optimized nucleotide sequence - one that differs from a naturally
occurring sequence by at least one (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200 or
more or all) codon substitution, the codon substitution being one that promotes
a higher level of expression of the nucleic acid in a given cell, than does the
naturally occurring sequence.
- Component of a bacterial luciferase system - LuxA, LuxB, LuxC, LuxD, LuxE,
or FMN oxidoreductase.
- Cell - Although the codon-optimized nucleic acids of the invention are
optimized for use in mammalian-cells, the nature of mammalian codon usage allows
expression of the nucleic acids in non-mammalian cells such as those from
organisms such as zebrafish, yeast (e.g., Candida species), and plants
(e.g., tobacco, canola, arabidopsis).
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patents, currently there
are no enforceable rights.
|
University of Tennessee Research Foundation
1534 WHITE AVENUE
SUITE 403
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37996
Ph: +1-865-974-1882
Email: vhunley@tennessee.edu
|
|
WO
2004/042010
- Earliest priority - 30 Oct 2002
- Filed - 30 Oct 2003
- Published - 21 may 2004
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Modified luciferase nucleic acids and methods of use
Claim 1
A nucleic acid comprising a codon-optimized nucleotide sequence encoding a
component of a bacterial luciferase system.
|
Claim 9
A cell comprising a nucleic acid comprising a codon-optimized nucleotide
sequence encoding a component of a bacterial luciferase system.
|
Claim 19
A method comprising the step of introducing into a mammalian cell a nucleic
acid comprising a codon-optimized nucleotide-sequence encoding a component of a
bacterial luciferase system.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a nucleic acid comprising a codon-optimized bacterial luciferase system
(claim 1)
- a cell comprising a codon-optimized bacterial luciferase system (claim 9)
- a method comprising introducing a codon-optimized bacterial luciferase
system into a mammalian cell (claim 19)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 2004/142356.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
| Remarks |
National phase entry of WO 2004/042010 in Australia (AU 2003/301883) is
pending.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
14/09/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
bioreporter and (Sayler in inventor)
|
|
Results
|
27
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 27 results identified using these search terms, 4 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent application filed and patents owned by The Secretary of State
for Defence in her Britannic Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain & North Ireland of Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL,
formerly Defence Evaluation and Research Agency)
Technology overview
The patent family described in this section was disclosed by a
research team lead by Dr N.C. Bruce at the Institute of Biotechnology,
University of Cambridge at the time of filing. The technology concerns PETN
reductase and its corresponding onr gene, which codes for an enzyme
that catalyses the removal of nitrite from PETN, glycerol trinitrate (GTN) and
ethylene glycol dinitrate (EGDN). PETN has diverse applications in explosives,
detonators, and in the pharmaceutical field. Synthesis, utilization and disposal
of PETN can lead to environmental contamination of this compound due to its
recalcitrant nature.[add a comment]
The title of the assignees in the four patent documents described
below are all slightly different, but seem to be the same entity (DSTL).[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication No.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
CA 2226729
- Earliest priority - 11 Jul 1995
- Filed - 8 Jul 1996
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Detection and biodegradation of explosives
|
Claim 1
A PETN reductase enzyme which catalyses the removal of nitrite from PETN
characterised in having the amino acid sequence shown in Figure 4 or a
derivative thereof.
|
|
Claim 28
An Enterobacter cloacae bacterial strain referred to as "PB2" and
deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants and variants thereof capable of producing
enzymic activity which degrades PETN in the presence of NADPH.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a pentraerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) reductase enzyme (claim 1)
- An E. cloacae strain deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants and
variants thereof (claim 28)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 1997/03201.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
The Secretary of State for Defence in her Britannic Majesty's
Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & North Ireland
DSTL has a technology transfer and management company called Ploughshare
Innovations Ltd (a subsidiary of DSTL, URL:
http://www.ploughshareinnovations.com/):
Contact
Dr. Taj S Mattu - Marketing Manager
Ph +44 (0) 1980 590062
Email tajmattu@ploughshareinnovations.com
|
|
EP
837941
- Earliest priority - 11 Jul 1995
- Filed - 8 Jul 1996
- Granted - 12 Mar 2003
- Expected expiry - 8 Jul 2016
|
Title - Detection and biodegradation of explosives
|
Claim 1
A pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) reductase which catalyses the removal
of nitrite from PETN, characterised in that
it comprises the amino acid sequence shown in Figure 4, or a derivative
thereof, which
- derivative has PETN reductase activity that catalyses the removal of nitrite
from PETN and which
- has insertions, deletions and/or substitutions of the amino acid sequence of
Figure 4, and which
- is encodeable by a nucleic acid sequence which is at least 70% identical to
the coding sequence of Figure 3.
|
|
Claim 30
An Enterobacter cloacae bacterial strain deposited as NCIMB 40718
and mutants and variants thereof capable of producing enzymatic activity
degrading PETN in the presence of NADPH.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a pentraerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) reductase enzyme (claim 1)
- An E. cloacae strain deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants and
variants thereof (claim 30)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in WO 1997/03201.
Designated contracting States at the time of grant are: Switzerland, Germany,
Spain, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Liechtenstein, Netherlands, Sweden
|
The Secretary of State for Defence (GB), The Secretary of State for
DSTL
Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ GB
DSTL has a technology transfer and management company called Ploughshare
Innovations Ltd (a subsidiary of DSTL, URL:
http://www.ploughshareinnovations.com/):
Contact
Dr. Taj S Mattu - Marketing Manager
Ph +44 (0) 1980 590062
Email tajmattu@ploughshareinnovations.com
|
|
US
5928859
- Earliest priority - 11 Jul 1995
- Filed - 8 Jul 1996
- Granted - 27 Jul 1999
- Expected expiry - 8 Jul 2016
|
Title - Detection and biodegradation of explosives
|
Claim 1
A PETN reductase enzyme which catalyses the removal of nitrite from PETN
characterised in having the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID
NO: 2.
|
|
Claim 13
A method of detecting PETN in a sample, comprising
(1) subjecting the sample to a reaction involving the removal of nitrite from
PETN, the reaction being carried out in the presence of NADPH and PETN reductase
enzyme, having the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
2 until NADP and nitrite are produced, and
(2) detecting the occurrence of said reaction.
|
|
Claim 24
An Enterobacter cloacae bacterial strain referred to as "PB2" and
deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants thereof capable of producing enzymic
activity which degrades PETN in the presence of NADPH.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a pentraerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) reductase enzyme (claim 1)
- a method of detecting PETN (claim 13)
- an E. cloacae strain deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants and
variants thereof (claim 24)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- SEQ ID NO: 2 - amino acid sequence of PETN reductase (referred to as Figure
4 in WO 1997/03201 and others)
Comments:
Claim 1 recites a PETN reductase enzyme that is characterised as having a
defined amino acid sequence, the application of which is not defined and
therefore any kind of use is not limited.
|
The Secretary of State for Defence in her Britannic Majesty's
Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & North Ireland of Defence
Evaluation Research Agency
IVELY ROAD
FAMBOROUGH, HANTS, UNITED KINGDOM GU14
DSTL has a technology transfer and management company called Ploughshare
Innovations Ltd (a subsidiary of DSTL, URL:
http://www.ploughshareinnovations.com/):
Contact
Dr. Taj S Mattu - Marketing Manager
Ph +44 (0) 1980 590062
Email tajmattu@ploughshareinnovations.com
|
|
WO
1997/03201
- Earliest priority - 11 Jul 1995
- Filed - 8 Jul 1996
- Published - 30 Jan 1997
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Detection and biodegradation of explosives
|
Claim 1
A PETN reductase enzyme characterised in that:
(1) it catalyses the removal of nitrite from PETN; and
(2) it has reductase activity specifically at the nitrate ester linkage of PETN.
|
|
Claim 3
An enzyme having the amino acid sequence shown in Figure 4
or a derivative thereof.
|
|
Claim 4
The gene (designated onr) which encodes the enzyme, or a
derivative thereof.
|
|
Claim 5
A DNA molecule including the nucleotide sequence of the onr gene as
shown in Figure 3 or a derivative of that
sequence.
|
|
Claim 6
An enzyme comprising substantially the transcribed product
of the onr gene.
|
|
Claim 8
A recombinant DNA vector containing the onr gene or a
derivative thereof.
|
|
Claim 9
A host cell transformed with the onr gene or a
derivative thereof.
|
|
Claim 12
PETN reductase enzyme which is recombinantly produced.
|
|
Claim 13
A method for the production of PETN reductase enzyme or a derivative thereof
which comprises the steps of:
1) transforming host cells with the onr gene or a
derivative thereof,
2) suitably culturing said transformed host cells; and
3) extracting the enzyme from the growth medium or from the host cells after
disruption thereof.
|
|
Claim 25
A biosensor for the detection of PETN in a sample which comprises
- means for contacting the sample with a PETN reductase enzyme in the presence
of NADPH and
- means for detecting the occurrence of a reaction, catalysed by the enzyme,
of PETN when PETN is present in the sample.
|
|
Claim 26
A biosensor for the detection of GTN and/or EGDN in a sample which comprises
- means for contacting the sample with a PETN reductase enzyme in the presence
of NADPH and
- means for detecting the occurrence of a reaction, catalyzed by the enzyme,
of GTN and/or EGDN when either or both is present in the sample.
|
|
Claim 32
An Enterobacter cloacae bacterial strain referred to as"PB2" and
deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants and variants thereof capable of producing
enzymic activity which degrades PETN in the presence of NADPH.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- the pentraerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) reductase enzyme (claims 1, 3, 12)
- the onr gene (which codes for PETN reductase; claim 4)
- a DNA molecule including the nucleotide sequence of the onr gene
(claim 5)
- an enzyme comprising substantially the transcribed product of the
onr gene (claim 6)
- a recombinant DNA vector containing the onr gene (claim 8)
- a host cell transformed with the onr gene (claim 9)
- a method for the production of PETN reductase enzyme (claim 13)
- a biosensor for the detection of PETN in a sample (claim 25)
- a biosensor for the detection of glycerol trinitrate (GTN) and/or ethylen
glycol dinitrate (EGDN) in a sample (claim 26)
- an E. cloacae strain deposited as NCIMB 40718, and mutants and
variants thereof (claim 32)
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- Figure 4 - amino acid sequence of a PETN reductase enzyme
- Derivative (of the enzyme) - a version of the enzyme sequence of Figure 4
containing insertions, deletions and/or substitutions of the amino acid sequence
such that the functionality of the enzyme is retained.
- Figure 3 - nucleotide sequence of the onr gene
- Derivative (of the gene) - homologues of the gene having a coding sequence
which is at least 70% identical to the onr gene, involving any and all single or
multiple nulceotide additions, deletions and/or substitutions thereto.
- Substantially (in claim 6) - the extent of this term is not specified,
therefore attention should be sought by the reader that this term is ambiguous
and warrants consideration
- Host cell - may be provided by either prokaryotic or eukaryotic organisms
|
The Secretary of State for Defence (GB), Defence Evaluation &
Research Agency
DSTL has a technology transfer and management company called Ploughshare
Innovations Ltd (a subsidiary of DSTL, URL:
http://www.ploughshareinnovations.com/):
Contact
Dr. Taj S Mattu - Marketing Manager
Ph +44 (0) 1980 590062
Email tajmattu@ploughshareinnovations.com
|
|
Remarks
|
- Other national phase entries of WO 1997/03201 include Czech Republic (CZ
295656, reported as granted on INPADOC), Hungary (HU 224000, reported as granted
on INPADOC), Israel (IL 122801), Norway (NO 980107), Poland (PL 188502, reported
as granted on INPADOC)
- National phase entry of WO 1997/03201 in Australia (AU 6365296) has lapsed
on 2 Apr 1998.
|
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
19/04/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
(Bruce in inventor) AND (pentaerythritol AND tetranitrate AND reductase)
|
|
Results
|
6
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 6 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on the full name of the
inventor, abstract and a review of the claims.
|
Patent owned by Duke University
Technology overview
A group of cadmium-induced RNAs were isolated and corresponding
cDNAs were sequenced from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans by PhD
student Vivian Hsiu-Chuan Liao and assistant professor Dr Jonathan Freedman from
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University at the time of filing. The
related scientific publication is Liao VH, Freedman JH. (1998).
Cadmium-regulated Genes from the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
J
Biol Chem. 273(48):31962-70273.[add a comment]
Details of the patent document
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
6916915
- Earliest priority - 20 Nov 1998
- Filed - 10 Nov 1999
- Granted - 12 Jul 2005
- Expected expiry - 10 Nov 2019
|
Title - Stressor regulated genes
|
Claim 1
An isolated nucleic acid comprising the sequence of DDRT2 (SEQ ID NO:34).
|
|
Claim 2
An isolated nucleic acid comprising the sequence of DDRT7 (SEQ ID NO:50).
|
|
Claim 3
An isolated nucleic acid comprising the sequence of DDRT16 (SEQ ID NO:40).
|
|
Claim 4
An isolated nucleic acid comprising the sequence of DDRT26 (SEQ ID NO:14).
|
The claims are generally drawn towards the following four isolated nucleic
acids comprising:
- DDRT2 - GenBank Accession no. AF071362 (claim 1)
- DDRT7 - GenBank Accession no. AF071398 (claim 2)
- DDRT16 - GenBank Accession no. AF071356 (claim 3)
- DDRT26 - GenBank Accession no. AF071379 (claim 4)
Comments:
The detailed description provides a section that introduces the invention to
include in its scope transgenic organims (animals and plants) containing the
genes above. The statement is extracted as follows:
'C. elegans or other organisms, the genome of which has been engineered to
include a cadmium-responsive gene. The gene can be modified to express a
reporter protein (e.g., ß-galactosidase or green fluorescent protein) in place
of the normal structural gene.'
Differential display reverse transcription (DDRT) - a polymerase chain
reaction (PCR)-based method to identify genes that are differentially expressed
in cells under altered conditions.
|
Duke University
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27708
Duke University Office of Science and Technology website has a list of staff
that can be contacted for licensing:
http://www.duke.edu/web/ost/technology/index.html
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
28 Apr 2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Simple
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search terms
|
biomonitor and cadmium
|
|
Results
|
22
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 22 results identified using these search terms, 3 results were
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent applications filed and patents owned by Performance Plants Inc.
Technology overview
Performance Plants Inc. (homepage:
http://www.performanceplants.com/home.html)
was founded in 1995 by Dr David Dennis and Dr Daniel Lefebvre of Queens
University at Ontario, Canada as a plant biotechnology R&D company.
Currently available technology include development of stress (heat and drought)
-resistant plants, and plants with increased product yield. They have been
actively filing patent applications of their technology through the PCT route
and USPTO.[add a comment]
The patent family described below discloses a nucleic acid coding for a
promoter that is unducible upon conditions of phosphate deprivation/limitation.
Mohammed Ali Malboobi, a PhD candidate under supervision of Dr Lefebvre at the
time the research was conducted, identified psr3.2 (phosphate
starvation-response) from Arabidopsis thaliana by screening the A.
thaliana genome library for genes that hybridize to psr3.1, which
was previously isolated from Brassica nigra. This gene was found to
code for a protein that belongs to the ß-glycosidase family, and was highly
expressed in roots under starvation of inorganic phosphate (Malboobi MA,
Lefebvre DD. (1997). A phosphate-starvation inducible beta-glucosidase gene
(psr3.2) isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana is a member of a distinct subfamily
of the BGA family.
Plant
Mol Biol. 34(1):57-68.). The promoter region of psr3.2 was
determined and and patent applications for the nucleic acid sequence and methods
to use the sequence were filed.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and Licensing Information
|
|
US
5922564
- Earliest priority - 24 Feb 1997
- Filed - 24 Feb 1997
- Granted - 13 Jul 1999
- Expected expiry - 24 Feb 2017
|
Title - Phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter
Claim 1
Isolated DNA of a photosynthetic organism
which, when operably linked to a structural gene, induces
transcription of the structural gene in a cell of a photosynthetic organism
under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency.
|
Claim 24
A method of increasing a phosphate-deficiency response in a photosynthetic
organism comprising:
a) inserting isolated DNA comprising nucleotides 1 to 1699 of SEQ ID
NO:1, or 50 to 200 or more consecutive nucleotides of the sequences
comprising nucleotides 1 to 1699 of SEQ ID NO:1, linked to a structural gene
into a cell, group of cells, tissue or organ of a photosynthetic organism;
b) maintaining the cell, group of cells, tissue or organ under conditions of
phosphate deficiency so that the structural gene is expressed; wherein the
phosphate-deficiency response is increased.
|
Claim 27
A method for expressing a gene product in a cell, a group of cells, a tissue
or an organ of a plant, photosynthetic organism or plant tissue culture
comprising:
a) transforming the cell, group of cells, tissue or organ
with a DNA construct comprising:
i) a phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter or 50 to 200 or more
consecutive nucleotides of the sequence comprising nucleotides 1 to 1699 of SEQ
ID NO:1;
ii) DNA encoding a structural gene operably linked to the promoter; and
iii) a 3' untranslated region containing a polyadenylated region;
b) regenerating a plant, photosynthetic organism or plant tissue culture from
the cell, group of cells, tissue or organ; and
c) placing the plant, photosynthetic organism or tissue culture under
conditions of phosphate deficiency; wherein the promoter induces transcription
of the structural gene so that the gene product is expressed.
|
Claim 31
A method of detecting transformation in a cell, a group of cells, a tissue,
an organ or an organism comprising:
a) incorporating a DNA comprising a phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter
obtained from a photosynthetic plant operably linked to a structural gene
encoding a product into a cell, a group of cells, a tissue, an organ or an
organism; and
b) maintaining the cell, group of cells, tissue, organ or organism under
phosphate deficient conditions appropriate for promoter activity so that the
product is expressed; wherein expression of the product is indicative of a
transformed cell, a transformed group of cells, a transformed tissue, a
transformed organ or a transformed organism.
|
Claim 32
Isolated plant DNA which, when operably linked to a structural gene, induces
transcription of the structural gene in a cell of a photosynthetic organism
under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under conditions of phosphate
sufficiency.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated DNA of a photosynthetic organism that induces transcription of
the structural gene in a cell of a photosynthetic organism under conditions of
phosphate deficiency (claim 1)
- a method of increasing a phosphate-deficiency response in a photosynthetic
organism (claim 24)
- a method for expressing a gene product in a cell, a group of cells, a tissue
or an organ of a plant, photosynthetic organism or plant tissue culture (claim
27)
- a method of detecting transformation in a cell, a group of cells, a tissue,
an organ or an organism (claim 31)
- an isolated plant DNA that induces transcription of the structural gene in a
cell of a photosynthetic organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency
(claim 32)
Definitions extracted from the description are:
- isolated DNA (nucleic acid) - nucleic acids separated away from the nucleic
acids of the genomic DNA or cellular RNA of their source of origin (e.g., as it
exists in cells or in a mixture of nucleic acids such as a library), and may
have undergone further processing.
- photosynthetic organism - there is no definition for this term. A subsequent
dependent claim recites a 'plant'. The following organisms are 'included'
according to the description: angiosperms (monocots and dicots), gymnosperms,
spore-bearing or vegetatively-reproducing plants and the algae, including the
cyanophyta (blue-green algae)... multicellular and unicellular algae'.
- structural gene - a gene, regulatory or otherwise, which encodes a product,
such as a peptide, polypeptide or protein.
- phosphate deficiency - there is no definition for this term. Example 6
describes an experiment with transgenic A. thaliana seedlings that were
'starved for inorganic phosphate for 14 days'.
- starvation - a level of phosphate available to the plant which is not only
limiting, but is below that required for normal maintenance and/or growth
wherein, if phosphate is maintained at that level, the plant or photosynthetic
organism would eventually die for lack of adequate phosphorus.
- SEQ ID NO:1 - DNA sequence of 5'-flanking region of psr3.2 gene
-
psr3.2 - phosphate-starvation responsive β-glucosidase gene
- transforming - by a method appropriate to the type of host cells (e.g.,
transformation, electroporation, transfection). For the purposes of this
disclosure, the terms "transformed with", "transformant", "transformation",
"transfect with", and "transfection" all refer to the introduction of a nucleic
acid into a cell by one of the numerous methods known to persons skilled in the
art.
Comments:
Granted US 5922564 has a continuation which has been granted as US 6175060
(see below).
Independent claim 32 (see above) encompasses a whole group of
promoter/regulatory element sequences isolated from plants that are induced upon
phosphate deficiency, which may be fairly broad in scope and warrants attention.
|
Performance Plants Inc.
BIOSCIENCE COMPLEX
Queen's University
116 Barrie Street, Suite 4600
Kingston, ON K7L 3N6
Ph 613.545.0390
Fax 613.545.3618
Email information@performanceplants.com
CROP DEVELOPMENT CENTRE
Saskatoon Research Centre
Innovation Place
101-108 Research Drive
Saskatoon, SK S7N 3R3
Ph 306.668.7708
Fax 306.975.3942
Email information@performanceplants.com
|
|
US
6175060
- Earliest priority - 24 Feb 1997
- Filed - 26 Apr 1999
- Granted - 16 Jan 2001
- Patent expired - 16 Feb 2005
|
Title - Phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter
Claim 1
A plant comprising a plant cell comprising
- a vector comprising
- isolated DNA which, when operably linked to a structural gene, induces
transcription of the structural gene in a cell derived from a photosynthetic
organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under conditions of
phosphate sufficiency.
|
Claim 5
A plant regenerated from a plant cell or tissue culture expressing a gene
product, the plant cell or tissue culture transformed by the method of:
a) transforming the plant cell with a DNA construct comprising:
i) a phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter or a functional portion thereof,
which induces transcription of a structural gene under phosphate-deficient
conditions;
ii) DNA encoding a structural gene operably linked to the promoter; and
iii) a 3' untranslated region containing a polyadenylated region;
b) regenerating a plant or tissue culture from the cell; and
c) placing the plant or tissue culture under conditions of phosphate deficiency;
wherein the promoter induces transcription of the structural gene so that the
gene product is expressed.
|
Claim 6
A method of transforming a plant cell, the method comprising:
(a) introducing into a plant cell:
(i) a first isolated nucleic acid from a plant which, when operably linked
to a structural gene, induces transcription of the structural gene in a cell of
a photosynthetic organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(ii) a second isolated nucleic acid, operably linked for expression to the
isolated nucleic acid of (i); and
(b) selecting a transformed plant cell wherein expression of the second isolated
nucleic acid occurs under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency.
|
Claim 14
A process for producing a protein or polypeptide in a plant cell, the process
comprising:
(a) introducing into a plant cell:
(i) a first isolated nucleic acid from a plant which, when operably linked
to a structural gene, induces transcription of the structural gene in a cell of
a photosynthetic organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(ii) a second isolated nucleic acid, said second isolated nucleic acid
encoding the protein or polypeptide, and said second isolated nucleic acid
operably linked for expression to the isolated nucleic acid of (i);
(b) selecting a transformed plant cell wherein expression of the second isolated
nucleic acid occurs under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(c) growing the transformed plant cell under conditions of phosphate deficiency,
thereby inducing transcription of the structural gene, thereby producing the
protein or polypeptide in a plant cell.
|
Claim 19
A process for producing a plant wholly or partially resistant to an external
stress, the process comprising:
(a) introducing into a plant cell:
(i) a first isolated nucleic acid from a plant which, when operably linked
to a structural gene, induces transcription of the structural gene in a cell of
a photosynthetic organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(ii) a second isolated nucleic acid, said second isolated nucleic acid
encoding a protein or polypeptide that confers resistance to the external
stress, or which in turn allows the production or increased production of a
substance that confers resistance to the external stress; and said second
isolated nucleic acid operably linked for expression to the isolated nucleic
acid of (i);
(b) selecting a transformed plant cell wherein expression of the second isolated
nucleic acid occurs under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(c) growing the transformed plant cell into a plant in which said first nucleic
acid induces the expression of the second isolated nucleic acid under conditions
of phosphate deficiency but not under conditions of phosphate sufficiency.
|
Claim 21
A method for detecting transformation in a plant cell, the method comprising:
(a) introducing into a plant cell:
(i) a first isolated nucleic acid from a plant which, when operably linked
to a structural gene, induces transcription of the structural gene in a cell of
a photosynthetic organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(ii) a second isolated nucleic acid which comprises the β-glucuronidase
(GUS) gene and which is operably linked for expression to the isolated nucleic
acid of (i); and
(b) growing the transformed plant cell under conditions of phosphate deficiency,
thereby inducing transcription of the second isolated nucleic acid; and
(c) selecting by color change, a transformed plant cell wherein expression of
the second isolated nucleic acid occurs under conditions of phosphate deficiency
but not under conditions of phosphate sufficiency.
|
Claim 25
A process for producing a substance from a plant cell or seed, wherein the
amount of the substance in the plant cell or seed is increased due to the
presence in the plant cell or seed of a protein or polypeptide, the process
comprising:
(a) introducing into a plant cell:
(i) a first isolated nucleic acid from a plant which, when operably linked
to a second isolated nucleic acid, induces transcription of the second isolated
nucleic acid in a cell of a photosynthetic organism under conditions of
phosphate deficiency but not under conditions of phosphate sufficiency; and
(ii) a second isolated nucleic acid, said second isolated nucleic acid
encoding a protein or polypeptide, and said second isolated nucleic acid
operably linked for expression to the first isolated nucleic acid, and where the
amount of substance in a plant cell or seed is increased due to the presence of
the protein or polypeptide in the plant cell or seed;
(b) selecting a transformed plant cell wherein expression of the second isolated
nucleic acid occurs under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under
conditions of phosphate sufficiency;
(c) growing the transformed plant cell or a plant regenerated therefrom under
conditions of phosphate deficiency, thereby inducing transcription of the second
isolated nucleic acid; and
(d) isolating the substance from the transformed plant cell or a seed produced
by the plant of step (c); thereby producing the substance from the plant cell or
seed.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- a plant comprising a plant cell comprising a vector comprising an isolated
DNA that induces transcription of a structural gene under conditions of
phosphate deficiency (claim 1)
- (a method to create) a plant regenerated from a plant cell or tissue culture
expressing a gene product (claim 5)
- a method of transforming a plant cell (claim 6)
- a process for producing a protein or polypeptide in a plant cell (claim 14)
- a process for producing a plant wholly or partially resistant to an external
stress (claim 19)
- a method for detecting transformation in a plant cell (claim 21)
- a process for producing a substance from a plant cell or seed (claim 25)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in US 5922564.
Other definitions include:
- functional portion - a truncated sequence of a promoter (of this invention)
which maintains the capability of inducing transcription of a structural gene
under the phosphate deficient conditions as described supra.
Comments:
Granted US 6175060 is a continuation of now granted US 5922564 (see above).
This patent has expired due to non-payment of maintenance fees.
|
|
WO
1998/38295
- Earliest priority - 24 Feb 1997
- Filed - 24 Feb 1998
- Published - 3 Sept 1998
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter
Claim 1
Isolated DNA which, when operably linked to a structural gene, induces
transcription of the structural gene in a cell derived from a photosynthetic
organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency but not under conditions of
phosphate sufficiency.
|
Claim 12
A plant cell containing isolated DNA comprising SEQ ID NO:1 or a functional
portion thereof.
|
Claim 18
A method of increasing a phosphate-deficiency response in a photosynthetic
organism comprising:
a) inserting isolated DNA comprising SEQ ID NO:l, or functional portion
thereof, linked to a structural gene into a cell or a group of cells of a
photosynthetic organism;
b) maintaining the cell or group of cells under conditions of phosphate
deficiency so that the structural gene is expressed; wherein the
phosphate-deficiency response is increased.
|
Claim 21
A method for expressing a gene product in a cell of a plant, photosynthetic
organism or tissue culture comprising:
a) transforming the cell with a DNA construct comprising:
i) a phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter or a functional portion
thereof;
ii) DNA encoding a structural gene operably linked to the promoter; and
iii) a 3' untranslated region containing a polyadenylated region;
b) regenerating a plant, photosynthetic organism or tissue culture from the
cell; and
c) placing the plant, photosynthetic organism or tissue culture under
conditions of phosphate deficiency; wherein the promoter induces transcription
of the structural gene so that the gene product is expressed.
|
Claim 25
A method of detecting transformation in a cell, a group of cells, a tissue or
an organism comprising:
a) incorporating a DNA comprising a phosphate-deficiency inducible promoter
operably linked to a structural gene encoding a product into a cell, a group of
cells, a tissue or an organism; and
b) maintaining the cell under phosphate deficient conditions appropriate
for promoter activity so that the product is expressed; wherein expression of
the product is indicative of a transformed cell.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated DNA that induces transcription of the structural gene in a cell
of a photosynthetic organism under conditions of phosphate deficiency (claim 1)
- a plant cell containing isolated DNA comprising SEQ ID NO:1 or a functional
portion thereof (claim 12)
- a method of increasing a phosphate-deficiency response in a photosynthetic
organism (claim 18)
- a method for expressing a gene product in a cell of a plant, photosynthetic
organism or tissue culture (claim 21)
- a method of detecting transformation in a cell (claim 25)
Definitions extracted from the description are provided in US 5922564 and US
6175060.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, currently
there are no enforceable rights.
|
|
Remarks
|
- National phase entry of WO 1998/38295 in Australia (AU 60849/98) has lapsed
as reported on 18 Oct 2001.
- National phase entry of WO 1998/38295 in Canada (CA 2280939) has lapsed as
reported on 24 Feb 2003.
- National phase entry of WO 1998/38295 in China (CN 1248289) has been deemed
to be withdrawn on 22 Sept 2004.
- National phase entry of WO 1998/38295 in Europe (EP 973884) has been deemed
to be withdrawn on 12 Mar 2003.
- National phase entry of WO 1998/38295 in Japan (JP 2001/512977) has been
deemed to be withdrawn on 24 May 2006.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
20/07/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Structured, stemming on
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search term
|
((phosph* in abstract) OR (phosph* in title)) AND ((promoter in abstract) OR
(promoter in title)) AND (((limit* or deficien*) in abstract) OR ((limit* or
deficien*) in title)
|
|
Results
|
2
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 2 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on their abstracts and a review
of their claims.
|
Patent application filed by Purdue Research Foundation
Technology overview
A research team lead by Dr KG Raghothama at the Purdue Research Foundation
identified two A. thaliana phosphate transporters by screening a cDNA
library of A. thaliana that was starved of phosphate using yeast PHO84
(gene that codes for a high affinity phosphate transporter; Muchhal US, Pardo
JM, Raghothama KG. (1996). Phosphate transporters from the higher plant
Arabidopsis thaliana.
Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93(19):10519-23). They then screened a tomato cDNA
library using the two identified A. thaliana phosphate transporter
genes as probes, and also found two genes that had phosphate transporter
functions (Liu C, Muchhal US, Uthappa M, Kononowicz AK, Raghothama KG. (1998).
Tomato phosphate transporter genes are differentially regulated in plant tissues
by phosphorus.
Plant
Physiol. 116(1):91-9). All four phosphate transporters were found to be
induced in root tissue under conditions of phosphate deficiency. Nucleic acid
and amino acid sequences of the phosphate transporters, along with methods to
use the transporters were filed as a PCT application, with Australia the only
jurisdiction that was reported by INPADOC to reach national phase (which has
lapsed, see below).[add a comment]
Details of the patent document
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and Licensing Information
|
|
WO
1998/004701
- Earliest priority - 29 Jul 1996
- Filed - 29 Jul 1997
- Published - 5 Feb 1998
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Methods and compositions for improving a plant's
ability to take in phosphate from soil
Claim 1
An isolated DNA segment comprising a nucleotide sequence having
substantial identity to the sequence set forth in SEQ
ID NO: I; SEQ ID NO:2; SEQ ID NO:3;
or SEQ ID NO:4.
|
Claim 2
A DNA construct comprising
- a promoter operably linked to a DNA segment which may be
expressed in a host cell to produce a phosphate transporter
protein:
- wherein the promoter regulates expression of the nucleotide sequence in the
host cell:
- wherein the host cell expresses the nucleotide sequence; and
- wherein the phosphate transporter protein has substantial
identity to an amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID
NO:5; SEQ ID NO:6; SEQ ID NO:7; or
SEQ ID NO:8.
|
Claim 15
A cell having incorporated therein a foreign nucleotide sequence comprising
- a promoter operably linked to a DNA sequence having substantial identity to
SEQ ID NO: I; SEQ ID NO:2; SEQ ID NO:3; or SEQ ID NO:4.
|
Claim 18
A plant having incorporated into its genome a foreign DNA
construct comprising
- a promoter operably linked to a DNA sequence having substantial identity to
SEQ ID NO: 1; SEQ ID NO:2; SEQ ID NO:3; or SEQ ID NO:4.
|
Claim 19
A method for improving a plant's ability to grow in phosphate-deficient soil,
comprising:
- incorporating into the plant's genome an DNA construct comprising a promoter
operably linked to a DNA sequence having substantial identity to SEQ ID NO:l;
SEQ ID NO:2; SEQ ID NO:3; or SEQ ID NO:4 to provide a transformed plant;
wherein the transformed plant is capable of over-expressing phosphate
transporter proteins.
|
Claim 20
A method for improving a plants ability to grow in phosphate-deficient soil,
comprising:
- providing a vector comprising a promoter operably linked to a nucleotide
sequence encoding a phosphate transporter protein; wherein the promoter
regulates expression of the nucleotide sequence in a host plant cell; and
-
transforming the target plant with the vector to provide a
transformed plant, the transformed plant being capable of expressing the
nucleotide sequence.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated DNA segment comprising a nucleotide sequence having substantial
identity to SEQ ID NO: I; SEQ ID NO:2: SEQ ID NO:3: or SEQ ID NO:4 (claim 1)
- a DNA construct comprising a promoter operably linked to a DNA segment to
produce a phosphate transporter protein (claim 2)
- a cell having incorporated a foreign nucleotide sequence comprising a
promoter operably linked to a DNA sequence (claim 15)
- a plant having incorporated into its genome a foreign DNA construct
comprising a promoter operably linked to a DNA sequence (claim 18)
- a method for improving a plant's ability to grow in phosphate-deficient soil
(claim 19)
- a method for improving a plants ability to grow in phosphate-deficient soil
(claim 20)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- substantial identity (for amino acid sequences) - is intended to mean
sufficiently similar to have suitable functionality when expressed in a plant
transformed in accordance with the invention to achieve the advantageous result
of the invention. In one preferred aspect of the present invention, variants
having such potential modifications as those mentioned above, which have at
least about 50% identity to an amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NOS:5-8,
are considered to have "substantial identity" thereto.
- sunstantial identity (for nucleic acid sequences) - the nucleotide sequence
has a sequence sufficiently similar to one of those explicitly set forth herein
that it will hybridize therewith under moderately stringent conditions, this
method of determining identity being well known in the art to which the
invention pertains. Briefly, moderately stringent conditions are defined in
Sambrook et al.. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2ed. Vol. 1, pp.
101-104. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1989) as including the use of a
prewashing solution of 5 x SSC, 0.5% SDS, 1.0mM EDTA (pH 8.0) and hybridization
and washing conditions of about 55 C, 5 x SSC.
- SEQ ID NO: I - A. thaliana phosphate transporter 1 cDNA
- SEQ ID NO:2 - A. thaliana phosphate transporter 2 cDNA
- SEQ ID NO:3 - Lycopersicon esczdentum phosphate transporter 1 cDNA
- SEQ ID NO:4 - L. esczdentum phosphate transporter 2 cDNA
- SEQ ID NO:5 - A. thaliana phosphate transporter 1 protein
- SEQ ID NO:6 - A. thaliana phosphate transporter 2 protein
- SEQ ID NO:7 - L. esczdentum phosphate transporter 1 protein
- SEQ ID NO:8 - L. esczdentum phosphate transporter 2 protein
- operably linked - if the nature of the linkage between the two DNA sequences
does not (1) result in the introduction of a frame-shift mutation, (2) interfere
with the ability of the promoter region sequence to direct the transcription of
the desired nucleotide sequence, or (3) interfere with the ability of the
desired nucleotide sequence to be transcribed by the promoter region sequence.
- host cell - according to the description there is no evidence for this term
to be limited to a particular species.
- plant - a wide variety... including gymnosperms, monocots and dicots.
- transforming - may be achieved using one of a wide variety of techniques.
Comments:
Since this document is a published application and not a granted patent,
there are no enforceable rights.
|
Purdue Research Foundation
Purdue Technology Center
3000 Kent Avenue
West Lafayette, IN 47906
Ph +1 (765) 494-8645
Fax +1 (765) 496-1146
|
| Remarks |
National phase entry of WO 1998/04701 in Australia (AU 38218/97) has lapsed
on 29 Apr 1999.
|
Search strategy
This patent document was identified as a document of particular relevance in
the international search report for WO 1998/38295 filed by Performance Plants
Inc..[add a comment]
Patent applications filed by Ceres Inc.
Technology overview
Ceres Inc. is a US biotechnology company focusing on the field of plant
genomics. One of the founding scientists of Ceres Inc., Dr Richard Schneeberger,
identified 17 DNA sequences from A. thaliana that has functions as
nitrogen responsive promoters or promoter control elements that respond to
change in environmental nitrogen concentration.[add a comment]
Details of patent documents
|
Patent or Publication no.
|
Title, Independent Claims and Summary
|
Assignee and licensing information
|
|
US
2006/107346
- Earliest priority - 22 Sept 2004
- Filed - 22 Sept 2005
- Application pending
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Promoter, promoter control elements, and
combinations, and uses thereof
Claim 1
An isolated nitrogen responsive promoter capable of modulating
transcription comprising
- a nucleic acid molecule having at least 85% sequence
identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-17, or a complement thereof.
|
Claim 3
A vector construct comprising:
a) a nitrogen responsive promoter capable of modulating transcription
comprising a first nucleic acid molecule having at least 80% sequence identity
to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-17; and
b) a second nucleic acid molecule having to be transcribed,
wherein said first and second nucleic acid molecules are
heterologous to each other and are operatively
linked together.
|
Claim 7
A method of modulating transcription by combining, in an environment suitable
for transcription:
a) a nitrogen responsive promoter capable of modulating transcription
comprising a first nucleic acid molecule having at least 80% sequence identity
to a sequence according to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-17; and
b) a second molecule to be transcribed;
wherein the first and second nucleic acid molecules are heterologous to each
other and operatively linked together.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nitrogen responsive promoter (claim 1)
- a vector construct comprising a nitrogen responsive promoter and a second
nucleic acid molecule having to be transcribed (claim 3)
- a method of modulating transcription by combining a nitrogen responsive
promoter and a second nucleic acid molecule to be transcribed (claim 7)
Definitions extracted from the specification are:
- modulate transcription - describes the biological activity of a promoter
sequence or promoter control element. Such modulation includes, without
limitation, includes up- and down-regulation of initiation of transcription,
rate of transcription, and/or transcription levels.
- % sequence identity - is determined by comparing two optimally aligned
sequences over a comparison window, where the fragment of the polynucleotide or
amino acid sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or deletions
(e.g., gaps or overhangs) as compared to the reference sequence (which does not
comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences.
- operably linked - is a linkage in which a promoter sequence or promoter
control element is connected to a polynucleotide sequence (or sequences) in such
a way as to place transcription of the polynucleotide sequence under the
influence or control of the promoter or promoter control element.
- heterologous (nucleic acid molecules) - those that are not operatively
linked or are not contiguous to each other in nature.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
Ceres, Inc.
1535 Rancho Conejo Blvd.
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Ph +1 (805) 376-6500
info@ceresbiotechnology.com
|
|
WO
2006/036864
- Earliest priority - 22 Sept 2004
- Filed - 22 Sept 2005
- Published - 6 Apr 2006
- Expected expiry - not applicable
|
Title - Promoter, promoter control elements, and
combinations, and uses thereof
Claim 1
An isolated nitrogen responsive promoter capable of modulating transcription
comprising
- a nucleic acid molecule having at least 85% sequence identity to any one of
SEQ ID NOs: 1-17, or a complement thereof.
|
Claim 3
A vector construct comprising:
a) a nitrogen responsive promoter capable of modulating transcription
comprising a first nucleic acid molecule having at least 80% sequence identity
to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-17; and
b) a second nucleic acid molecule having to be transcribed, wherein said first
and second nucleic acid molecules are heterologous to each other and are
operatively linked together.
|
Claim 7
A method of modulating transcription by combining, in an environment suitable
for transcription:
a) a nitrogen responsive promoter capable of modulating transcription
comprising a first nucleic acid molecule having at least 80% sequence identity
to a sequence according to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-17; and
b) a second molecule to be transcribed; wherein the first and second nucleic
acid molecules are heterologous to each other and operatively linked together.
|
The claims are generally drawn towards:
- an isolated nitrogen responsive promoter (claim 1)
- a vector construct comprising a nitrogen responsive promoter and a second
nucleic acid molecule having to be transcribed (claim 3)
- a method of modulating transcription by combining a nitrogen responsive
promoter and a second nucleic acid molecule to be transcribed (claim 7)
Definitions extracted from the specification are provided in US 2006/107346.
Comments:
Since this is a published application and not a granted patent, there are no
enforceable rights.
|
Search strategy
|
Search details
|
|
|
Date of search
|
09/06/2006
|
|
Database searched
|
Patent Lens
|
|
Type of search
|
Expert, stemming off
|
|
Collections searched
|
AU-B, US-A, US-B, EP-B, WO
|
|
Search term
|
(((inducible near/10 stress) or (induced near/10 stress)) and ((promoter in
title) or (promoter in abstract)) and plant and ((nitrogen in title) or
(nitrogen in abstract)))
|
|
Results
|
6
|
|
Comments
|
Of the 6 results identified using these search terms, one result was
identified as being of particular interest based on the abstracts and review of
the claims.
|
Download PDF Copy
This PDF copy is dated April 11, 2007. Changes may have been made to this
Technology Landscape after this date.
Download
PDF (info)
The information contained in this page was believed to be
correct at the time it was collated. New patents and patent applications,
altered status of patents, and case law may have resulted in changes in the
landscape. CAMBIA makes no warranty that it is correct or up to date at this
time and accepts no liability for any use that might be made of it. Corrections
or updates to the information are welcome. Please send an email to
info@bios.net.
The information contained in this page was believed to be correct at the
time it was collated. New patents and patent applications, altered
status of patents, and case law may have resulted in changes in the
landscape. CAMBIA makes no warranty that it is correct or up to date at
this time and accepts no liability for any use that might be made of it.
Corrections or updates to the information are welcome, please send an email to
info@bios.net.